493 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 31948425)
1. Peers as OSCE assessors for junior medical students - a review of routine use: a mixed methods study.
Schwill S; Fahrbach-Veeser J; Moeltner A; Eicher C; Kurczyk S; Pfisterer D; Szecsenyi J; Loukanova S
BMC Med Educ; 2020 Jan; 20(1):17. PubMed ID: 31948425
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. The AaLplus near-peer teaching program in Family Medicine strengthens basic medical skills-A five-year retrospective study.
Schwill S; Hundertmark J; Fahrbach-Veeser J; Eicher C; Tonchev P; Kurczyk S; Szecsenyi J; Loukanova S
PLoS One; 2020; 15(5):e0233748. PubMed ID: 32470972
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Assessing Advanced Communication Skills via Objective Structured Clinical Examination: A Comparison of Faculty Versus Self, Peer, and Standardized Patient Assessors.
Talwalkar JS; Murtha TD; Prozora S; Fortin AH; Morrison LJ; Ellman MS
Teach Learn Med; 2020; 32(3):294-307. PubMed ID: 32141335
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. The quality of feedback during formative OSCEs depends on the tutors' profile.
Junod Perron N; Louis-Simonet M; Cerutti B; Pfarrwaller E; Sommer J; Nendaz M
BMC Med Educ; 2016 Nov; 16(1):293. PubMed ID: 27846882
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Students' perceptions of a near-peer Objective Structured Clinical Examination (OSCE) in medical imaging.
Taylor D; Quick S
Radiography (Lond); 2020 Feb; 26(1):42-48. PubMed ID: 31902454
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Effects of participation in a cross year peer tutoring programme in clinical examination skills on volunteer tutors' skills and attitudes towards teachers and teaching.
Buckley S; Zamora J
BMC Med Educ; 2007 Jun; 7():20. PubMed ID: 17598885
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. The pedagogical value of near-peer feedback in online OSCEs.
Sader J; Cerutti B; Meynard L; Geoffroy F; Meister V; Paignon A; Junod Perron N
BMC Med Educ; 2022 Jul; 22(1):572. PubMed ID: 35879752
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Medical students' perception of objective structured clinical examination: a feedback for process improvement.
Nasir AA; Yusuf AS; Abdur-Rahman LO; Babalola OM; Adeyeye AA; Popoola AA; Adeniran JO
J Surg Educ; 2014; 71(5):701-6. PubMed ID: 25012605
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. The benefits of a peer-assisted mock OSCE.
Young I; Montgomery K; Kearns P; Hayward S; Mellanby E
Clin Teach; 2014 Jun; 11(3):214-8. PubMed ID: 24802924
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. The "Near-Peer" Approach to Teaching Musculoskeletal Physical Examination Skills Benefits Residents and Medical Students.
Rosenberg CJ; Nanos KN; Newcomer KL
PM R; 2017 Mar; 9(3):251-257. PubMed ID: 27292435
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Development of a Novel Web-Based Tool to Enhance Clinical Skills in Medical Education.
Aqib A; Fareez F; Assadpour E; Babar T; Kokavec A; Wang E; Lo T; Lam JP; Smith C
JMIR Med Educ; 2024 Jun; 10():e47438. PubMed ID: 38904482
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. A peer-led mock OSCE improves student confidence for summative OSCE assessments in a traditional medical course.
Braier-Lorimer DA; Warren-Miell H
Med Teach; 2022 May; 44(5):535-540. PubMed ID: 34822315
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. The efficacy of peer assessment in objective structured clinical examinations for formative feedback: a preliminary study.
Kim KJ; Kim G
Korean J Med Educ; 2020 Mar; 32(1):59-65. PubMed ID: 32130851
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. An assessment of student satisfaction with peer teaching of clinical communication skills.
Mills JK; Dalleywater WJ; Tischler V
BMC Med Educ; 2014 Oct; 14():217. PubMed ID: 25306897
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Enhancing medical students` confidence and performance in integrated structured clinical examinations (ISCE) through a novel near-peer, mixed model approach during the COVID-19 pandemic.
Baskaran R; Mukhopadhyay S; Ganesananthan S; Gamage MP; Dalavaye N; Ng V; Bennett R; Srinivasan S; Sureshkumarnair P; Spencer R; Bhatt H; Manivannan S; Zaben M
BMC Med Educ; 2023 Feb; 23(1):128. PubMed ID: 36823563
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Objectivity in subjectivity: do students' self and peer assessments correlate with examiners' subjective and objective assessment in clinical skills? A prospective study.
Inayah AT; Anwer LA; Shareef MA; Nurhussen A; Alkabbani HM; Alzahrani AA; Obad AS; Zafar M; Afsar NA
BMJ Open; 2017 May; 7(5):e012289. PubMed ID: 28487454
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Formative assessment of practical skills with peer-assessors: quality features of an OSCE in general medicine at the Heidelberg Medical Faculty.
Möltner A; Lehmann M; Wachter C; Kurczyk S; Schwill S; Loukanova S
GMS J Med Educ; 2020; 37(4):Doc42. PubMed ID: 32685670
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. The near-peer tutoring programme: embracing the 'doctors-to-teach' philosophy--a comparison of the effects of participation between the senior and junior near-peer tutors.
Liew SC; Sow CF; Sidhu J; Nadarajah VD
Med Educ Online; 2015; 20():27959. PubMed ID: 26356229
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Can near-peer medical students effectively teach a new curriculum in physical examination?
Blank WA; Blankenfeld H; Vogelmann R; Linde K; Schneider A
BMC Med Educ; 2013 Dec; 13():165. PubMed ID: 24325639
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. [Clinical-practical Examination in Orthopaedic Teaching: Who is the "Ideal" Examiner?].
Melcher P; Roth A; Ghanem M; Rotzoll D
Z Orthop Unfall; 2017 Aug; 155(4):468-475. PubMed ID: 28521380
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
