These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

280 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 31948503)

  • 1. The political construction of public health nutrition problems: a framing analysis of parliamentary debates on junk-food marketing to children in Australia.
    Russell C; Lawrence M; Cullerton K; Baker P
    Public Health Nutr; 2020 Aug; 23(11):2041-2052. PubMed ID: 31948503
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Generating political priority for regulatory interventions targeting obesity prevention: an Australian case study.
    Baker P; Gill T; Friel S; Carey G; Kay A
    Soc Sci Med; 2017 Mar; 177():141-149. PubMed ID: 28161671
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Trade and nutrition policy coherence: a framing analysis and Australian case study.
    Baker P; Friel S; Gleeson D; Thow AM; Labonte R
    Public Health Nutr; 2019 Aug; 22(12):2329-2337. PubMed ID: 31111806
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Framing of nutrition policy issues in the Australian news media, 2008-2018.
    Wise K; Cullerton K
    Aust N Z J Public Health; 2021 Oct; 45(5):491-496. PubMed ID: 34411381
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Who is donating to political parties in Queensland, Australia? An analysis of political donations from the food industry.
    Russell C; Hussain NAB; Sievert K; Cullerton K
    Public Health Nutr; 2023 Jul; 26(7):1501-1512. PubMed ID: 36855788
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Parliamentarians' strategies for policy evaluations.
    Bundi P
    Eval Program Plann; 2018 Aug; 69():130-138. PubMed ID: 28268022
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Diverse and competing interests around tobacco: qualitative analysis of two decades of parliamentary questions in India.
    Varma A; Chilgod L; Bhojani U
    BMJ Glob Health; 2021 Apr; 6(4):. PubMed ID: 33827791
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. The framing of malnutrition by parliamentarians in Uganda.
    Namugumya BS; Candel JJL; Termeer CJAM; Talsma EF
    Health Policy Plan; 2021 Jun; 36(5):585-593. PubMed ID: 33709155
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. What Generates Attention to Health in Trade Policy-Making? Lessons From Success in Tobacco Control and Access to Medicines: A Qualitative Study of Australia and the (Comprehensive and Progressive) Trans-Pacific Partnership.
    Townsend B; Friel S; Schram A; Baum F; Labonté R
    Int J Health Policy Manag; 2021 Oct; 10(10):613-624. PubMed ID: 32610761
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Moving from silos to synergies: strengthening governance of food marketing policy in Thailand.
    Phulkerd S; Ngqangashe Y; Collin J; Thow AM; Schram A; Schneider CH; Friel S
    Global Health; 2022 Mar; 18(1):29. PubMed ID: 35264200
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Problems, policy and politics - perspectives of public health leaders on food insecurity and human rights in Australia.
    Godrich SL; Barbour L; Lindberg R
    BMC Public Health; 2021 Jun; 21(1):1132. PubMed ID: 34118904
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. 'Sweet talk': framing the merits of a sugar tax in Australia.
    Anaf J; Fisher M; Handsley E; Baum F; Friel S
    Health Promot Int; 2021 Oct; 36(5):1334-1345. PubMed ID: 33496322
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Countering commercial interests: building advocacy campaigns to protect children from food marketing.
    Watson WL; Martin J
    Public Health Res Pract; 2019 Sep; 29(3):. PubMed ID: 31569207
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. An analysis of potential barriers and enablers to regulating the television marketing of unhealthy foods to children at the state government level in Australia.
    Chung A; Shill J; Swinburn B; Mavoa H; Lawrence M; Loff B; Crammond B; Sacks G; Allender S; Peeters A
    BMC Public Health; 2012 Dec; 12():1123. PubMed ID: 23272940
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Competing public narratives in nutrition policy: insights into the ideational barriers of public support for regulatory nutrition measures.
    Cullerton K; Patay D; Waller M; Adsett E; Lee A
    Health Res Policy Syst; 2022 Aug; 20(1):86. PubMed ID: 35945586
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Inhibitors and Supporters of Policy Change in the Regulation of Unhealthy Food Marketing in Australia.
    Ngqangashe Y; Phulkerd S; Schram A; Collin J; Schneider CH; Thow AM; Friel S
    Int J Health Policy Manag; 2024 Feb; ():. PubMed ID: 38618852
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. The Twitter parliamentarian database: Analyzing Twitter politics across 26 countries.
    van Vliet L; Törnberg P; Uitermark J
    PLoS One; 2020; 15(9):e0237073. PubMed ID: 32936830
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Barriers and opportunities to restricting marketing of unhealthy foods and beverages to children in Nepal: a policy analysis.
    Fisher L; Dahal M; Hawkes S; Puri M; Buse K
    BMC Public Health; 2021 Jul; 21(1):1351. PubMed ID: 34238256
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Message framing in the context of the national menu-labelling policy: a comparison of public health and private industry interests.
    Shelton RC; Colgrove J; Lee G; Truong M; Wingood GM
    Public Health Nutr; 2017 Apr; 20(5):814-823. PubMed ID: 27881193
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. State Preemption of Food and Nutrition Policies and Litigation: Undermining Government's Role in Public Health.
    Pomeranz JL; Zellers L; Bare M; Pertschuk M
    Am J Prev Med; 2019 Jan; 56(1):47-57. PubMed ID: 30467091
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 14.