These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
167 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 31949541)
1. Comparative Effectiveness and Functional Outcome of Open-Door versus French-Door Laminoplasty for Multilevel Cervical Myelopathy: A Meta-Analysis. Wiguna IGLNAA; Magetsari R; Noor Z; Suyitno S; Nindrea RD Open Access Maced J Med Sci; 2019 Oct; 7(19):3348-3352. PubMed ID: 31949541 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Open-versus French-Door Laminoplasty for the Treatment of Cervical Multilevel Compressive Myelopathy: A Meta-Analysis. Luo W; Li Y; Zhao J; Gu R; Jiang R; Lin F World Neurosurg; 2018 Sep; 117():129-136. PubMed ID: 29908382 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Open-door versus French-door laminoplasty for the treatment of cervical multilevel compressive myelopathy. Wang L; Wang Y; Yu B; Li Z; Liu X J Clin Neurosci; 2015 Mar; 22(3):450-5. PubMed ID: 25523126 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Comparative Five-Year Surgical Outcomes of Open-Door versus French-Door Laminoplasty in Multilevel Cervical Spondylotic Myelopathy. Chen G; Liu X; Zhao E; Chen N; Wei F; Liu S Biomed Res Int; 2020; 2020():8853733. PubMed ID: 33376747 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Open-Door versus French-Door Laminoplasty for Patients with Multisegmental Cervical Spondylotic Myelopathy: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis. Chen T; Zhang X; Meng F; Zhang T; Zhao Y; Yan J; Xu G; Zhao W World Neurosurg; 2021 Nov; 155():82-93. PubMed ID: 34425291 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Comparative effectiveness of open-door laminoplasty versus French-door laminoplasty in cervical compressive myelopathy. Nakashima H; Kato F; Yukawa Y; Imagama S; Ito K; Machino M; Ishiguro N Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2014 Apr; 39(8):642-7. PubMed ID: 24503689 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Comparative effectiveness of different types of cervical laminoplasty. Heller JG; Raich AL; Dettori JR; Riew KD Evid Based Spine Care J; 2013 Oct; 4(2):105-15. PubMed ID: 24436708 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Are clinical outcomes affected by laminoplasty method and K-line in patients with cervical ossification of posterior longitudinal ligament? A multicenter study. Li N; Ma S; Duan F; Wei Y; He D; Nagoshi N; Watanabe K; Nakamura M; Matsumoto M; Jeon H; Lee JJ; Kim KN; Ha Y; Kwan K; Cheung AKP; Clark A J Orthop Surg Res; 2022 Nov; 17(1):513. PubMed ID: 36434732 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Comparison of surgical outcomes after cervical laminoplasty: open-door technique versus French-door technique. Lee DG; Lee SH; Park SJ; Kim ES; Chung SS; Lee CS; Eoh W J Spinal Disord Tech; 2013 Aug; 26(6):E198-203. PubMed ID: 23511650 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Anterior cervical corpectomy and fusion versus posterior laminoplasty for the treatment of oppressive myelopathy owing to cervical ossification of posterior longitudinal ligament: a meta-analysis. Qin R; Chen X; Zhou P; Li M; Hao J; Zhang F Eur Spine J; 2018 Jun; 27(6):1375-1387. PubMed ID: 29335903 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Comparative Effectiveness and Safety of Open-Door Laminoplasty, French-Door Laminoplasty, Laminectomy and Fusion, and Laminectomy Alone for Multilevel Degenerative Cervical Myelopathy: A Bayesian Network Analysis. Li X; Yu H; Welle K; Gathen M; Zhang L; Xiao J; Kabir K Adv Ther; 2022 Jan; 39(1):117-139. PubMed ID: 34812993 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. A prospective randomized study of clinical outcomes in patients with cervical compressive myelopathy treated with open-door or French-door laminoplasty. Okada M; Minamide A; Endo T; Yoshida M; Kawakami M; Ando M; Hashizume H; Nakagawa Y; Maio K Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2009 May; 34(11):1119-26. PubMed ID: 19444058 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Is laminoplasty or laminectomy the best strategy for C Chen T; Zhang X; Meng F; Yan J; Xu G; Zhao W J Orthop Surg Res; 2021 Sep; 16(1):557. PubMed ID: 34521434 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Incidence and Outcomes of C5 Palsy and Axial Pain After Open-Door Laminoplasty or Laminectomy and Fusion: A Meta-Analysis. Li FH; Qiao HH; Yang YC; Du JP; Jin XS; Wang B World Neurosurg; 2019 Aug; 128():e1002-e1009. PubMed ID: 31108254 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Anterior corpectomy versus posterior laminoplasty for the treatment of multilevel cervical myelopathy: A meta-analysis. Huang D; Du X; Liang H; Hu W; Hu H; Cheng X Int J Surg; 2016 Nov; 35():21-27. PubMed ID: 27622728 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Short-term complications and long-term results of expansive open-door laminoplasty for cervical stenotic myelopathy. Satomi K; Ogawa J; Ishii Y; Hirabayashi K Spine J; 2001; 1(1):26-30. PubMed ID: 14588365 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Clinical recovery after 5 level of posterior decompression spine surgeries in patients with cervical spondylotic myelopathy: A retrospective cohort study. Li Q; Han X; Wang R; Zhang Y; Liu P; Dong Q Asian J Surg; 2020 May; 43(5):613-624. PubMed ID: 31481282 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Is cervical lordosis relevant in laminoplasty? Kim SW; Hai DM; Sundaram S; Kim YC; Park MS; Paik SH; Kwak YH; Kim TH Spine J; 2013 Aug; 13(8):914-21. PubMed ID: 23541454 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Clinical and radiographic outcome of unilateral open-door laminoplasty with alternative levels centerpiece mini-plate fixation for cervical compressive myelopathy: a five-year follow-up study. Wang LN; Wang L; Song YM; Yang X; Liu LM; Li T Int Orthop; 2016 Jun; 40(6):1267-74. PubMed ID: 27087625 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Anterior cervical discectomy and fusion versus posterior laminoplasty for multilevel cervical myelopathy: A meta-analysis. Xu L; Sun H; Li Z; Liu X; Xu G Int J Surg; 2017 Dec; 48():247-253. PubMed ID: 28687344 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]