139 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 31953425)
1. Measurement of Prostate Volume with MRI (A Guide for the Perplexed): Biproximate Method with Analysis of Precision and Accuracy.
Wasserman NF; Niendorf E; Spilseth B
Sci Rep; 2020 Jan; 10(1):575. PubMed ID: 31953425
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Prostate volume prediction on MRI: tools, accuracy and variability.
Hamzaoui D; Montagne S; Granger B; Allera A; Ezziane M; Luzurier A; Quint R; Kalai M; Ayache N; Delingette H; Renard-Penna R
Eur Radiol; 2022 Jul; 32(7):4931-4941. PubMed ID: 35169895
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. A standardized method to measure the membranous urethral length (MUL) on MRI of the prostate with high inter- and intra-observer agreement.
Veerman H; Hagens MJ; Hoeks CM; van der Poel HG; van Leeuwen PJ; Vis AN; Heijmink SWTJP; Schoots IG; de Haan MC; Boellaard TN
Eur Radiol; 2023 May; 33(5):3295-3302. PubMed ID: 36512044
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Comparison of semi-automated and manual methods to measure the volume of prostate cancer on magnetic resonance imaging.
Marin L; Ezziane M; Comperat E; Mozer P; Cancel-Tassin G; Coté JF; Racoceanu D; Boudghene F; Lucidarme O; Cussenot O; Renard Penna R
Diagn Interv Imaging; 2017 May; 98(5):423-428. PubMed ID: 28330587
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Determination of Prostate Volume: A Comparison of Contemporary Methods.
Bezinque A; Moriarity A; Farrell C; Peabody H; Noyes SL; Lane BR
Acad Radiol; 2018 Dec; 25(12):1582-1587. PubMed ID: 29609953
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Accuracy Validation of an Automated Method for Prostate Segmentation in Magnetic Resonance Imaging.
Shahedi M; Cool DW; Bauman GS; Bastian-Jordan M; Fenster A; Ward AD
J Digit Imaging; 2017 Dec; 30(6):782-795. PubMed ID: 28342043
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Magnetic resonance imaging for prostate bed radiotherapy planning: An inter- and intra-observer variability study.
Barkati M; Simard D; Taussky D; Delouya G
J Med Imaging Radiat Oncol; 2016 Apr; 60(2):255-9. PubMed ID: 26568515
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. T2* mapping combined with conventional T2-weighted image for prostate cancer detection at 3.0T MRI: a multi-observer study.
Wu LM; Yao QY; Zhu J; Lu Q; Suo ST; Liu Q; Xu JR; Chen XX; Haacke EM; Hu J
Acta Radiol; 2017 Jan; 58(1):114-120. PubMed ID: 26917785
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Spatially varying accuracy and reproducibility of prostate segmentation in magnetic resonance images using manual and semiautomated methods.
Shahedi M; Cool DW; Romagnoli C; Bauman GS; Bastian-Jordan M; Gibson E; Rodrigues G; Ahmad B; Lock M; Fenster A; Ward AD
Med Phys; 2014 Nov; 41(11):113503. PubMed ID: 25370674
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Quantitative volumetric imaging of normal, neoplastic and hyperplastic mouse prostate using ultrasound.
Singh S; Pan C; Wood R; Yeh CR; Yeh S; Sha K; Krolewski JJ; Nastiuk KL
BMC Urol; 2015 Sep; 15():97. PubMed ID: 26391476
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Is the Ellipsoid Formula the New Standard for 3-Tesla MRI Prostate Volume Calculation without Endorectal Coil?
Haas M; Günzel K; Miller K; Hamm B; Cash H; Asbach P
Urol Int; 2017; 98(1):49-53. PubMed ID: 27627060
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Inter- and intra-observer variability in contouring of the prostate gland on planning computed tomography and cone beam computed tomography.
Choi HJ; Kim YS; Lee SH; Lee YS; Park G; Jung JH; Cho BC; Park SH; Ahn H; Kim CS; Yi SY; Ahn SD
Acta Oncol; 2011 May; 50(4):539-46. PubMed ID: 21391773
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Intra- and inter-observer variability in dependence of T1-time correction for common dynamic contrast enhanced MRI parameters in prostate cancer patients.
Daniel M; Polanec SH; Wengert G; Clauser P; Pinker K; Helbich TH; Georg D; Baltzer PAT
Eur J Radiol; 2019 Jul; 116():27-33. PubMed ID: 31153570
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Deep learning algorithm performs similarly to radiologists in the assessment of prostate volume on MRI.
Thimansson E; Bengtsson J; Baubeta E; Engman J; Flondell-Sité D; Bjartell A; Zackrisson S
Eur Radiol; 2023 Apr; 33(4):2519-2528. PubMed ID: 36371606
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Reduction of dose delivered to the rectum and bulb of the penis using MRI delineation for radiotherapy of the prostate.
Steenbakkers RJ; Deurloo KE; Nowak PJ; Lebesque JV; van Herk M; Rasch CR
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 2003 Dec; 57(5):1269-79. PubMed ID: 14630261
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Inter-reader agreement of multi-parametric MR imaging for the detection of prostate cancer: evaluation of a scoring system.
Quentin M; Arsov C; Röhlen S; Klasen J; Antoch G; Albers P; Blondin D
Rofo; 2012 Oct; 184(10):925-9. PubMed ID: 22744328
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Seminal vesicle invasion on multi-parametric magnetic resonance imaging: Correlation with histopathology.
Grivas N; Hinnen K; de Jong J; Heemsbergen W; Moonen L; Witteveen T; van der Poel H; Heijmink S
Eur J Radiol; 2018 Jan; 98():107-112. PubMed ID: 29279147
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Prostatic peripheral zone thickness: what is normal on magnetic resonance imaging?
Wasserman NF; Spilseth B; Sanghvi T
Abdom Radiol (NY); 2020 Dec; 45(12):4185-4193. PubMed ID: 32719960
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Multiparametric MRI in detection and staging of prostate cancer.
Boesen L
Dan Med J; 2017 Feb; 64(2):. PubMed ID: 28157066
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Multiparametric magnetic resonance imaging of the prostate with computer-aided detection: experienced observer performance study.
Giannini V; Mazzetti S; Armando E; Carabalona S; Russo F; Giacobbe A; Muto G; Regge D
Eur Radiol; 2017 Oct; 27(10):4200-4208. PubMed ID: 28386721
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
