304 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 31953483)
1. A noninferiority within-person study comparing the accuracy of transperineal to transrectal MRI-US fusion biopsy for prostate-cancer detection.
Ber Y; Segal N; Tamir S; Benjaminov O; Yakimov M; Sela S; Halstauch D; Baniel J; Kedar D; Margel D
Prostate Cancer Prostatic Dis; 2020 Sep; 23(3):449-456. PubMed ID: 31953483
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Is There an Impact of Transperineal Versus Transrectal Magnetic Resonance Imaging-targeted Biopsy in Clinically Significant Prostate Cancer Detection Rate? A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.
Uleri A; Baboudjian M; Tedde A; Gallioli A; Long-Depaquit T; Palou J; Basile G; Gaya JM; Sanguedolce F; Lughezzani G; Rajwa P; Pradere B; Roupret M; Briganti A; Ploussard G; Breda A
Eur Urol Oncol; 2023 Dec; 6(6):621-628. PubMed ID: 37634971
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Transperineal Versus Transrectal Targeted Biopsy With Use of Electromagnetically-tracked MR/US Fusion Guidance Platform for the Detection of Clinically Significant Prostate Cancer.
Winoker JS; Wajswol E; Falagario U; Maritini A; Moshier E; Voutsinas N; Knauer CJ; Sfakianos JP; Lewis SC; Taouli BA; Rastinehad AR
Urology; 2020 Dec; 146():278-286. PubMed ID: 32956688
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Transperineal Multiparametric Magnetic Resonance Imaging-Ultrasound Fusion Targeted Prostate Biopsy Combined with Standard Template Improves Prostate Cancer Detection.
Kim MM; Wu S; Lin SX; Crotty RK; Harisinghani M; Feldman AS; Wu CL; Dahl DM
J Urol; 2022 Jan; 207(1):86-94. PubMed ID: 34428921
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Transperineal Versus Transrectal MRI/TRUS Fusion Targeted Biopsy: Detection Rate of Clinically Significant Prostate Cancer.
Pepe P; Garufi A; Priolo G; Pennisi M
Clin Genitourin Cancer; 2017 Feb; 15(1):e33-e36. PubMed ID: 27530436
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Transperineal Magnetic Resonance Imaging-Targeted Biopsy May Perform Better Than Transrectal Route in the Detection of Clinically Significant Prostate Cancer: Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.
Tu X; Liu Z; Chang T; Qiu S; Xu H; Bao Y; Yang L; Wei Q
Clin Genitourin Cancer; 2019 Oct; 17(5):e860-e870. PubMed ID: 31281065
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Is targeted magnetic resonance imaging/transrectal ultrasound fusion prostate biopsy enough for the detection of prostate cancer in patients with PI-RADS ≥3: Results of a prospective, randomized clinical trial.
Zhang J; Zhu A; Sun D; Guo S; Zhang H; Liu S; Fu Q; Zhang K
J Cancer Res Ther; 2020; 16(7):1698-1702. PubMed ID: 33565519
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. The eternal enigma in prostatic biopsy access route.
Fabiani A; Principi E; Filosa A; Servi L
Arch Ital Urol Androl; 2017 Oct; 89(3):245-246. PubMed ID: 28969413
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Transperineal magnetic resonance imaging targeted biopsy versus transrectal route in the detection of prostate cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
Wu Q; Tu X; Zhang C; Ye J; Lin T; Liu Z; Yang L; Qiu S; Bao Y; Wei Q
Prostate Cancer Prostatic Dis; 2024 Jun; 27(2):212-221. PubMed ID: 37783837
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. The Detection of Prostate Cancer with Magnetic Resonance Imaging-Targeted Prostate Biopsies is Superior with the Transperineal vs the Transrectal Approach. A European Association of Urology-Young Academic Urologists Prostate Cancer Working Group Multi-Institutional Study.
Zattoni F; Marra G; Kasivisvanathan V; Grummet J; Nandurkar R; Ploussard G; Olivier J; Chiu PK; Valerio M; Gontero P; Guo H; Zhuang J; Barletta F; Leni R; Frydenberg M; Moon D; Hanegbi U; Landaumailto A; Snow R; Apfelbeck M; Kretschmer A; van den Bergh R; Novara G; Briganti A; Dal Moro F; Gandaglia G
J Urol; 2022 Oct; 208(4):830-837. PubMed ID: 36082555
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Initial experience of magnetic resonance imaging/ultrasonography fusion transperineal biopsy: Biopsy techniques and results for 75 patients.
Tae JH; Shim JS; Jin HJ; Yoon SG; No TI; Kim JY; Kang SH; Cheon J; Kang SG
Investig Clin Urol; 2018 Nov; 59(6):363-370. PubMed ID: 30402568
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Multicenter transperineal MRI-TRUS fusion guided outpatient clinic prostate biopsies under local anesthesia.
Jacewicz M; Günzel K; Rud E; Lauritzen PM; Galtung KF; Hinz S; Magheli A; Baco E
Urol Oncol; 2021 Jul; 39(7):432.e1-432.e7. PubMed ID: 33257219
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Evaluation of MRI/Ultrasound Fusion-Guided Prostate Biopsy Using Transrectal and Transperineal Approaches.
Tewes S; Peters I; Tiemeyer A; Peperhove M; Hartung D; Pertschy S; Kuczyk MA; Wacker F; Hueper K
Biomed Res Int; 2017; 2017():2176471. PubMed ID: 29094042
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Do cancer detection rates differ between transperineal and transrectal micro-ultrasound mpMRI-fusion-targeted prostate biopsies? A propensity score-matched study.
Rakauskas A; Peters M; Martel P; van Rossum PSN; La Rosa S; Meuwly JY; Roth B; Valerio M
PLoS One; 2023; 18(1):e0280262. PubMed ID: 36652429
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Transperineal vs transrectal magnetic resonance and ultrasound image fusion prostate biopsy: a pair-matched comparison.
Kaneko M; Medina LG; Lenon MSL; Hemal S; Sayegh AS; Jadvar DS; Ramacciotti LS; Paralkar D; Cacciamani GE; Lebastchi AH; Salhia B; Aron M; Hopstone M; Duddalwar V; Palmer SL; Gill IS; Abreu AL
Sci Rep; 2023 Aug; 13(1):13457. PubMed ID: 37596374
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Prostate Cancer Detection and Complications of Transperineal Versus Transrectal Magnetic Resonance Imaging-fusion Guided Prostate Biopsies.
Buller D; Sahl J; Staff I; Tortora J; Pinto K; McLaughlin T; Olivo Valentin L; Wagner J
Urology; 2023 Jul; 177():109-114. PubMed ID: 37059232
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Feasibility of freehand MRI/US cognitive fusion transperineal biopsy of the prostate in local anaesthesia as in-office procedure-experience with 400 patients.
Wetterauer C; Shahin O; Federer-Gsponer JR; Keller N; Wyler S; Seifert HH; Kwiatkowski M
Prostate Cancer Prostatic Dis; 2020 Sep; 23(3):429-434. PubMed ID: 31896767
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Comparison of transperineal and transrectal targeted prostate biopsy using Mahalanobis distance matching within propensity score caliper method: A multicenter study of Turkish Urooncology Association.
Koparal MY; Sözen TS; Karşıyakalı N; Aslan G; Akdoğan B; Şahin B; Türkeri L;
Prostate; 2022 Mar; 82(4):425-432. PubMed ID: 34927740
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Prostate Cancer Detection Rate of Transperineal Prostate Biopsy: Cognitive vs Software Fusion, A Multicenter Analysis.
Hung M; Ross AE; Li EV; Pavlovich CP; Fletcher SA; Gereta S; Zhang TR; McClure TD; Allaf ME; Schaeffer EM; Hu JC
Urology; 2024 Apr; 186():91-97. PubMed ID: 38387509
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. A Prospective Comparison of Transrectal Standard, Cognitive, Transperineal Fusion, and Mapping Prostate Biopsy for Cancer Detection.
Petov V; Bazarkin A; Morozov A; Taratkin M; Ganzha T; Danilov S; Chernov Y; Chinenov D; Rzayev R; Suvorov A; Amosov A; Fajkovic H; Enikeev D; Krupinov G
J Endourol; 2023 Aug; 37(8):940-947. PubMed ID: 37294206
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
