222 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 31953731)
1. Laparoscopic radical hysterectomy has higher risk of perioperative urologic complication than abdominal radical hysterectomy: a meta-analysis of 38 studies.
Hwang JH; Kim BW
Surg Endosc; 2020 Apr; 34(4):1509-1521. PubMed ID: 31953731
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Urologic complication in laparoscopic radical hysterectomy: meta-analysis of 20 studies.
Hwang JH
Eur J Cancer; 2012 Nov; 48(17):3177-85. PubMed ID: 22824588
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Robotic Radical Hysterectomy Is Not Superior to Laparoscopic Radical Hysterectomy in Perioperative Urologic Complications: A Meta-Analysis of 23 Studies.
Hwang JH; Kim BW; Kim SR; Kim JH
J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2020 Jan; 27(1):38-47. PubMed ID: 31315060
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Comparison of urologic complications between laparoscopic radical hysterectomy and abdominal radical hysterectomy: A nationwide study from the National Health Insurance.
Hwang JH; Kim BW; Jeong H; Kim H
Gynecol Oncol; 2020 Jul; 158(1):117-122. PubMed ID: 32354468
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Comparison of oncological outcomes and major complications between laparoscopic radical hysterectomy and abdominal radical hysterectomy for stage IB1 cervical cancer with a tumour size less than 2 cm.
Li Z; Chen C; Liu P; Duan H; Liu M; Xu Y; Li P; Zhang W; Jiang H; Bin X; Lang J
Eur J Surg Oncol; 2021 Aug; 47(8):2125-2133. PubMed ID: 33781626
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. The incidence of urologic complications requiring urologic procedure in radical hysterectomy and difference between abdominal radical hysterectomy and laparoscopic radical hysterectomy.
Kim H; Jeong HJ; Kim BW; Hwang JH
J Gynecol Oncol; 2021 Nov; 32(6):e84. PubMed ID: 34431255
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Postoperative pain and perioperative outcomes after laparoscopic radical hysterectomy and abdominal radical hysterectomy in patients with early cervical cancer: a randomised controlled trial.
Campos LS; Limberger LF; Stein AT; Kalil AN
Trials; 2013 Sep; 14():293. PubMed ID: 24028441
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Long-Term Oncological Outcomes After Laparoscopic Versus Abdominal Radical Hysterectomy in Stage IA2 to IIA2 Cervical Cancer: A Matched Cohort Study.
Wang W; Chu HJ; Shang CL; Gong X; Liu TY; Zhao YH; Huang JM; Yao SZ
Int J Gynecol Cancer; 2016 Sep; 26(7):1264-73. PubMed ID: 27643649
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Matched-Case Comparisons in a Single Institution to Determine Critical Points for Inexperienced Surgeons' Successful Performances of Laparoscopic Radical Hysterectomy versus Abdominal Radical Hysterectomy in Stage IA2-IIA Cervical Cancer.
Suh DH; Cho HY; Kim K; No JH; Kim YB
PLoS One; 2015; 10(6):e0131170. PubMed ID: 26110866
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Comparison of Survival Outcomes after Laparoscopic Radical Hysterectomy versus Abdominal Radical Hysterectomy in Patients with Cervical Cancer.
Hwang JH; Kim BW
J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2021 May; 28(5):971-981.e3. PubMed ID: 33321255
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Laparoscopically Assisted Radical Vaginal Hysterectomy for Early-Stage Cervical Cancer: A Systemic Review and Meta-Analysis.
Zhang S; Wang S; Lv A; Huang S
Int J Gynecol Cancer; 2016 Oct; 26(8):1497-502. PubMed ID: 27400320
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Laparoscopic Nerve-Sparing Radical Hysterectomy vs Laparoscopic Radical Hysterectomy in Cervical Cancer: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Clinical Efficacy and Bladder Dysfunction.
Wu J; Ye T; Lv J; He Z; Zhu J
J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2019; 26(3):417-426.e6. PubMed ID: 30359783
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. [Comparison of safety and efficacy of laparoscopic versus abdominal radical hysterectomy in the treatment of patients with stage I a2-II b cervical cancer].
Yang L; Yang P; Li D; Cai J; Shen Y; Dong W; Zhang Y; Xiong Z; Chen H; Min J; Wang H; Wang Y; Liang W; Wang Z
Zhonghua Fu Chan Ke Za Zhi; 2015 Dec; 50(12):915-22. PubMed ID: 26887875
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Meta-analysis of laparoscopic radical hysterectomy, excluding robotic assisted versus open radical hysterectomy for early stage cervical cancer.
Marchand G; Masoud AT; Abdelsattar A; King A; Ulibarri H; Parise J; Arroyo A; Coriell C; Goetz S; Moir C; Moberly A; Govindan M
Sci Rep; 2023 Jan; 13(1):273. PubMed ID: 36609438
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Trainee participation and perioperative complications in benign hysterectomy: the effect of route of surgery.
Barber EL; Harris B; Gehrig PA
Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2016 Aug; 215(2):215.e1-7. PubMed ID: 26884272
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Laparoscopic Versus Abdominal Radical Hysterectomy for Cervical Cancer: A Meta-analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials.
Zhang F; Song X
Am J Clin Oncol; 2022 Nov; 45(11):465-474. PubMed ID: 36256872
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. [Long-term oncological outcomes after laparoscopic versus abdominal radical hysterectomy in stage I a2- II a2 cervical cancer: a matched cohort study].
Wang W; Shang C; Huang J; Chen S; Shen H; Yao S
Zhonghua Fu Chan Ke Za Zhi; 2015 Dec; 50(12):894-901. PubMed ID: 26887872
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. The incidence, causes, and management of lower urinary tract injury during total laparoscopic hysterectomy.
İnan AH; Budak A; Beyan E; Kanmaz AG
J Gynecol Obstet Hum Reprod; 2019 Jan; 48(1):45-49. PubMed ID: 30321609
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Laparoscopic Radical Hysterectomy in Early Stage Cervical Cancer: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.
Zhao Y; Hang B; Xiong GW; Zhang XW
J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A; 2017 Nov; 27(11):1132-1144. PubMed ID: 28300465
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Robotic radical hysterectomy is superior to laparoscopic radical hysterectomy and open radical hysterectomy in the treatment of cervical cancer.
Jin YM; Liu SS; Chen J; Chen YN; Ren CC
PLoS One; 2018; 13(3):e0193033. PubMed ID: 29554090
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
