180 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 31953903)
1. Meta-analysis of full ROC curves with flexible parametric distributions of diagnostic test values.
Hoyer A; Kuss O
Res Synth Methods; 2020 Mar; 11(2):301-313. PubMed ID: 31953903
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Meta-analysis of full ROC curves using bivariate time-to-event models for interval-censored data.
Hoyer A; Hirt S; Kuss O
Res Synth Methods; 2018 Mar; 9(1):62-72. PubMed ID: 29052956
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Meta-analysis of full ROC curves: Additional flexibility by using semiparametric distributions of diagnostic test values.
Hoyer A; Kuss O
Res Synth Methods; 2019 Dec; 10(4):528-538. PubMed ID: 31231986
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Sensitivity analysis for publication bias in meta-analysis of diagnostic studies for a continuous biomarker.
Hattori S; Zhou XH
Stat Med; 2018 Feb; 37(3):327-342. PubMed ID: 28990209
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. A new parametric method based on S-distributions for computing receiver operating characteristic curves for continuous diagnostic tests.
Sorribas A; March J; Trujillano J
Stat Med; 2002 May; 21(9):1213-35. PubMed ID: 12111875
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Bivariate random effects meta-analysis of ROC curves.
Arends LR; Hamza TH; van Houwelingen JC; Heijenbrok-Kal MH; Hunink MG; Stijnen T
Med Decis Making; 2008; 28(5):621-38. PubMed ID: 18591542
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Smooth non-parametric receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves for continuous diagnostic tests.
Zou KH; Hall WJ; Shapiro DE
Stat Med; 1997 Oct; 16(19):2143-56. PubMed ID: 9330425
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Summary ROC curve based on a weighted Youden index for selecting an optimal cutpoint in meta-analysis of diagnostic accuracy.
Rücker G; Schumacher M
Stat Med; 2010 Dec; 29(30):3069-78. PubMed ID: 21170902
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Bivariate analysis of sensitivity and specificity produces informative summary measures in diagnostic reviews.
Reitsma JB; Glas AS; Rutjes AW; Scholten RJ; Bossuyt PM; Zwinderman AH
J Clin Epidemiol; 2005 Oct; 58(10):982-90. PubMed ID: 16168343
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Mixture models in diagnostic meta-analyses--clustering summary receiver operating characteristic curves accounted for heterogeneity and correlation.
Schlattmann P; Verba M; Dewey M; Walther M
J Clin Epidemiol; 2015 Jan; 68(1):61-72. PubMed ID: 25441701
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Associating explanatory variables with summary receiver operating characteristic curves in diagnostic meta-analysis.
Hamza TH; van Houwelingen HC; Heijenbrok-Kal MH; Stijnen T
J Clin Epidemiol; 2009 Dec; 62(12):1284-91. PubMed ID: 19398297
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. A mixed effect model for bivariate meta-analysis of diagnostic test accuracy studies using a copula representation of the random effects distribution.
Nikoloulopoulos AK
Stat Med; 2015 Dec; 34(29):3842-65. PubMed ID: 26234584
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Partial Youden index and its inferences.
Li C; Chen J; Qin G
J Biopharm Stat; 2019; 29(2):385-399. PubMed ID: 30359546
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Meta-analysis of test accuracy studies using imputation for partial reporting of multiple thresholds.
Ensor J; Deeks JJ; Martin EC; Riley RD
Res Synth Methods; 2018 Mar; 9(1):100-115. PubMed ID: 29052347
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Meta-analysis for the comparison of two diagnostic tests to a common gold standard: A generalized linear mixed model approach.
Hoyer A; Kuss O
Stat Methods Med Res; 2018 May; 27(5):1410-1421. PubMed ID: 27487844
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Tests of equivalence and non-inferiority for diagnostic accuracy based on the paired areas under ROC curves.
Liu JP; Ma MC; Wu CY; Tai JY
Stat Med; 2006 Apr; 25(7):1219-38. PubMed ID: 16158400
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. An empirical comparison of methods for meta-analysis of diagnostic accuracy showed hierarchical models are necessary.
Harbord RM; Whiting P; Sterne JA; Egger M; Deeks JJ; Shang A; Bachmann LM
J Clin Epidemiol; 2008 Nov; 61(11):1095-103. PubMed ID: 19208372
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Multivariate random effects meta-analysis of diagnostic tests with multiple thresholds.
Hamza TH; Arends LR; van Houwelingen HC; Stijnen T
BMC Med Res Methodol; 2009 Nov; 9():73. PubMed ID: 19903336
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Fully non-parametric receiver operating characteristic curve estimation for random-effects meta-analysis.
Martínez-Camblor P
Stat Methods Med Res; 2017 Feb; 26(1):5-20. PubMed ID: 24872352
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. On the exact interval estimation for the difference in paired areas under the ROC curves.
Li CR; Liao CT; Liu JP
Stat Med; 2008 Jan; 27(2):224-42. PubMed ID: 17139702
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]