These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

183 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 31953903)

  • 21. An empirical comparison of three methods for multiple cutoff diagnostic test meta-analysis of the Patient Health Questionnaire-9 (PHQ-9) depression screening tool using published data vs individual level data.
    Benedetti A; Levis B; Rücker G; Jones HE; Schumacher M; Ioannidis JPA; Thombs B;
    Res Synth Methods; 2020 Nov; 11(6):833-848. PubMed ID: 32896096
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Tutorial: statistical methods for the meta-analysis of diagnostic test accuracy studies.
    Schlattmann P
    Clin Chem Lab Med; 2023 Apr; 61(5):777-794. PubMed ID: 36656998
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Bayesian semi-parametric ROC analysis.
    Erkanli A; Sung M; Costello EJ; Angold A
    Stat Med; 2006 Nov; 25(22):3905-28. PubMed ID: 16416403
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Influence diagnostics and outlier detection for meta-analysis of diagnostic test accuracy.
    Matsushima Y; Noma H; Yamada T; Furukawa TA
    Res Synth Methods; 2020 Mar; 11(2):237-247. PubMed ID: 31724796
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Nonparametric estimation of ROC curves in the absence of a gold standard.
    Zhou XH; Castelluccio P; Zhou C
    Biometrics; 2005 Jun; 61(2):600-9. PubMed ID: 16011710
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Smooth semiparametric receiver operating characteristic curves for continuous diagnostic tests.
    Wan S; Zhang B
    Stat Med; 2007 May; 26(12):2565-86. PubMed ID: 17072821
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Smooth ROC curve estimation via Bernstein polynomials.
    Wang D; Cai X
    PLoS One; 2021; 16(5):e0251959. PubMed ID: 34032801
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. New nonparametric confidence intervals for the Youden index.
    Zhou H; Qin G
    J Biopharm Stat; 2012; 22(6):1244-57. PubMed ID: 23075020
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Empirical Bayes estimates generated in a hierarchical summary ROC analysis agreed closely with those of a full Bayesian analysis.
    Macaskill P
    J Clin Epidemiol; 2004 Sep; 57(9):925-32. PubMed ID: 15504635
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Meta-analysis for diagnostic accuracy studies: a new statistical model using beta-binomial distributions and bivariate copulas.
    Kuss O; Hoyer A; Solms A
    Stat Med; 2014 Jan; 33(1):17-30. PubMed ID: 23873593
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Nonparametric meta-analysis for diagnostic accuracy studies.
    Zapf A; Hoyer A; Kramer K; Kuss O
    Stat Med; 2015 Dec; 34(29):3831-41. PubMed ID: 26174020
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. A parametric comparison of diagnostic accuracy with three ordinal diagnostic groups.
    Xiong C; van Belle G; Miller JP; Yan Y; Gao F; Yu K; Morris JC
    Biom J; 2007 Aug; 49(5):682-93. PubMed ID: 17763377
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. A unification of models for meta-analysis of diagnostic accuracy studies without a gold standard.
    Liu Y; Chen Y; Chu H
    Biometrics; 2015 Jun; 71(2):538-47. PubMed ID: 25358907
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Meta-analysis for the comparison of two diagnostic tests-A new approach based on copulas.
    Hoyer A; Kuss O
    Stat Med; 2018 Feb; 37(5):739-748. PubMed ID: 29193212
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. The partial area under the summary ROC curve.
    Walter SD
    Stat Med; 2005 Jul; 24(13):2025-40. PubMed ID: 15900606
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. The Youden Index in the Generalized Receiver Operating Characteristic Curve Context.
    Martínez-Camblor P; Pardo-Fernández JC
    Int J Biostat; 2019 Apr; 15(1):. PubMed ID: 30943172
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. A unification of models for meta-analysis of diagnostic accuracy studies.
    Harbord RM; Deeks JJ; Egger M; Whiting P; Sterne JA
    Biostatistics; 2007 Apr; 8(2):239-51. PubMed ID: 16698768
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. A principled approach to setting optimal diagnostic thresholds: where ROC and indifference curves meet.
    Irwin RJ; Irwin TC
    Eur J Intern Med; 2011 Jun; 22(3):230-4. PubMed ID: 21570638
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Measurement error and confidence intervals for ROC curves.
    Tosteson TD; Buonaccorsi JP; Demidenko E; Wells WA
    Biom J; 2005 Aug; 47(4):409-16. PubMed ID: 16161800
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. A comparison of bivariate, multivariate random-effects, and Poisson correlated gamma-frailty models to meta-analyze individual patient data of ordinal scale diagnostic tests.
    Simoneau G; Levis B; Cuijpers P; Ioannidis JPA; Patten SB; Shrier I; Bombardier CH; de Lima Osório F; Fann JR; Gjerdingen D; Lamers F; Lotrakul M; Löwe B; Shaaban J; Stafford L; van Weert HCPM; Whooley MA; Wittkampf KA; Yeung AS; Thombs BD; Benedetti A
    Biom J; 2017 Nov; 59(6):1317-1338. PubMed ID: 28692782
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.