BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

281 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 31954071)

  • 1. CA-125 reduction during neoadjuvant chemotherapy is associated with success of cytoreductive surgery and outcome of patients with advanced high-grade ovarian cancer.
    Kessous R; Wissing MD; Piedimonte S; Abitbol J; Kogan L; Laskov I; Yasmeen A; Salvador S; Lau S; Gotlieb WH
    Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand; 2020 Jul; 99(7):933-940. PubMed ID: 31954071
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Treatment strategies for patients with advanced ovarian cancer undergoing neoadjuvant chemotherapy: interval debulking surgery or additional chemotherapy?
    Yoneoka Y; Ishikawa M; Uehara T; Shimizu H; Uno M; Murakami T; Kato T
    J Gynecol Oncol; 2019 Sep; 30(5):e81. PubMed ID: 31328461
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Ascites regression following neoadjuvant chemotherapy in prediction of treatment outcome among stage IIIc to IV high-grade serous ovarian cancer.
    Xu X; Deng F; Lv M; Ren B; Guo W; Chen X
    J Ovarian Res; 2016 Dec; 9(1):85. PubMed ID: 27912779
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Similar Overall Survival Using Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy or Primary Debulking Surgery in Patients Aged Over 75 Years with High-Grade Ovarian Cancer.
    Piedimonte S; Kessous R; Laskov I; Abitbol J; Kogan L; Yasmeen A; Salvador S; Lau S; Gotlieb WH
    J Obstet Gynaecol Can; 2020 Nov; 42(11):1339-1345. PubMed ID: 32859533
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. External validation of a 'response score' after neoadjuvant chemotherapy in patients with high-grade serous ovarian carcinoma with complete clinical response.
    Zorzato PC; Zannoni GF; Tudisco R; Pasciuto T; Di Giorgio A; Franchi M; Scambia G; Fagotti A
    Int J Gynecol Cancer; 2020 Jan; 30(1):67-73. PubMed ID: 31754067
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Prognostic value of HE4 in advanced-stage, high-grade serous ovarian cancer: Analysis of HE4 kinetics during NACT, predicting surgical outcome and recurrence in comparison to CA125.
    AlSomairi A; Himayda S; Altelmesani A; Lee YJ; Lee JY
    Gynecol Oncol; 2024 Feb; 181():155-161. PubMed ID: 38176127
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Neoadjuvant chemotherapy versus debulking surgery in advanced tubo-ovarian cancers: pooled analysis of individual patient data from the EORTC 55971 and CHORUS trials.
    Vergote I; Coens C; Nankivell M; Kristensen GB; Parmar MKB; Ehlen T; Jayson GC; Johnson N; Swart AM; Verheijen R; McCluggage WG; Perren T; Panici PB; Kenter G; Casado A; Mendiola C; Stuart G; Reed NS; Kehoe S; ;
    Lancet Oncol; 2018 Dec; 19(12):1680-1687. PubMed ID: 30413383
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. A preoperative low cancer antigen 125 level (≤25.8 mg/dl) is a useful criterion to determine the optimal timing of interval debulking surgery following neoadjuvant chemotherapy in epithelial ovarian cancer.
    Morimoto A; Nagao S; Kogiku A; Yamamoto K; Miwa M; Wakahashi S; Ichida K; Sudo T; Yamaguchi S; Fujiwara K
    Jpn J Clin Oncol; 2016 Jun; 46(6):517-21. PubMed ID: 26977055
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. The Impact of Percent Reduction in CA-125 Levels on Prediction of the Extent of Interval Cytoreduction and Outcome in Patients With Advanced-Stage Cancer of Müllerian Origin Treated With Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy.
    Mahdi H; Maurer KA; Nutter B; Rose PG
    Int J Gynecol Cancer; 2015 Jun; 25(5):823-9. PubMed ID: 25828750
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Interval debulking surgery is not worth the wait: a National Cancer Database study comparing primary cytoreductive surgery versus neoadjuvant chemotherapy.
    Lyons YA; Reyes HD; McDonald ME; Newtson A; Devor E; Bender DP; Goodheart MJ; Gonzalez Bosquet J
    Int J Gynecol Cancer; 2020 Jun; 30(6):845-852. PubMed ID: 32341114
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Primary debulking surgery versus primary neoadjuvant chemotherapy for high grade advanced stage ovarian cancer: comparison of survivals.
    Kobal B; Noventa M; Cvjeticanin B; Barbic M; Meglic L; Herzog M; Bordi G; Vitagliano A; Saccardi C; Skof E
    Radiol Oncol; 2018 Sep; 52(3):307-319. PubMed ID: 30210049
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Histopathology predicts clinical outcome in advanced epithelial ovarian cancer patients treated with neoadjuvant chemotherapy and debulking surgery.
    Muraji M; Sudo T; Iwasaki S; Ueno S; Wakahashi S; Yamaguchi S; Fujiwara K; Nishimura R
    Gynecol Oncol; 2013 Dec; 131(3):531-4. PubMed ID: 24096109
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. A Comparison of Survival Outcomes in Advanced Serous Ovarian Cancer Patients Treated With Primary Debulking Surgery Versus Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy.
    May T; Comeau R; Sun P; Kotsopoulos J; Narod SA; Rosen B; Ghatage P
    Int J Gynecol Cancer; 2017 May; 27(4):668-674. PubMed ID: 28441250
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. RECIST 1.1 criteria predict recurrence-free survival in advanced ovarian cancer submitted to neoadjuvant chemotherapy.
    Bogani G; Matteucci L; Tamberi S; Ditto A; Sabatucci I; Murgia F; Arcangeli V; Maltese G; Comerci G; Stefanetti M; Sonetto C; Calareso G; Marchiano A; Chiappa V; Lorusso D; Raspagliesi F
    Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol; 2019 Jun; 237():93-99. PubMed ID: 31029972
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Efficacy and safety results from GEICO 1205, a randomized phase II trial of neoadjuvant chemotherapy with or without bevacizumab for advanced epithelial ovarian cancer.
    Garcia Garcia Y; de Juan Ferré A; Mendiola C; Barretina-Ginesta MP; Gaba Garcia L; Santaballa Bertrán A; Bover Barcelo I; Gil-Martin M; Manzano A; Rubio Pérez MJ; Romeo Marin M; Arqueros Núñez C; García-Martínez E; Gonzalez Martin A
    Int J Gynecol Cancer; 2019 Jul; 29(6):1050-1056. PubMed ID: 31263024
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Potential risk factors associated with prognosis of neoadjuvant chemotherapy followed by interval debulking surgery in stage IIIc-IV high-grade serous ovarian carcinoma patients.
    Zhang J; Liu N; Zhang A; Bao X
    J Obstet Gynaecol Res; 2018 Sep; 44(9):1808-1816. PubMed ID: 30019801
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Upfront debulking surgery versus interval debulking surgery for advanced tubo-ovarian high-grade serous carcinoma and diffuse peritoneal metastases treated with peritonectomy procedures plus HIPEC.
    Biacchi D; Accarpio F; Ansaloni L; Macrì A; Ciardi A; Federici O; Spagnoli A; Cavaliere D; Vaira M; Sapienza P; Sammartino P
    J Surg Oncol; 2019 Dec; 120(7):1208-1219. PubMed ID: 31531879
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Oncologic Concerns regarding Laparoscopic Cytoreductive Surgery in Patients with Advanced Ovarian Cancer Submitted to Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy.
    Favero G; Macerox N; Pfiffer T; Köhler C; da Costa Miranda V; Estevez Diz Mdel P; Fukushima JT; Baracat EC; Carvalho JP
    Oncology; 2015; 89(3):159-66. PubMed ID: 25968072
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Role of neoadjuvant chemotherapy in the management of advanced ovarian cancer.
    Zhao D; Wu LY; Wang XB; Li XG
    Asian Pac J Cancer Prev; 2015; 16(6):2369-73. PubMed ID: 25824766
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Incorporating robotic surgery into the management of ovarian cancer after neoadjuvant chemotherapy.
    Abitbol J; Gotlieb W; Zeng Z; Ramanakumar A; Kessous R; Kogan L; Pare-Miron V; Rombaldi M; Salvador S; Kucukyazici B; Brin S; How J; Lau S
    Int J Gynecol Cancer; 2019 Nov; 29(9):1341-1347. PubMed ID: 31601648
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 15.