164 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 31954350)
1. Ultrasound-guided non-targeted liver core biopsy: comparison of the efficacy of two different core needle biopsy systems using an ex-vivo animal model and retrospective review of clinical experience.
Ho LM; Pendse AA; Ronald J; Luciano M; Marin D; Jaffe TA; Nelson RC
Clin Imaging; 2020 May; 61():36-42. PubMed ID: 31954350
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Comparison of clinical efficacy, subjective user experience, and safety for two different core biopsy needles, the Achieve® and Marquee®.
Ho LM; Pendse AA; Ronald J; Desai H; Dai R; Ziegler C; Nelson RC; Wildman-Tobriner B
Abdom Radiol (NY); 2022 Aug; 47(8):2632-2639. PubMed ID: 34181039
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Adequacy of percutaneous non-targeted liver biopsy under real-time ultrasound guidance when comparing the Biopince™ and Achieve™ biopsy needle.
Hall TC; Deakin C; Atwal GS; Singh RK
Br J Radiol; 2017 Dec; 90(1080):20170397. PubMed ID: 28972801
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. EUS-guided core liver biopsy sampling using a 22-gauge fork-tip needle: a prospective blinded trial for histologic and lipidomic evaluation in nonalcoholic fatty liver disease.
Bazerbachi F; Vargas EJ; Matar R; Storm AC; Mounajjed TM; Topazian MD; Levy MJ; Chandrasekhara V; Abu Dayyeh BK
Gastrointest Endosc; 2019 Dec; 90(6):926-932. PubMed ID: 31437454
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Prospective Study of the Impact of Liver Biopsy Core Size on Specimen Adequacy and Procedural Complications.
Tublin ME; Blair R; Martin J; Malik S; Ruppert K; Demetris A
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2018 Jan; 210(1):183-188. PubMed ID: 29091001
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. EUS-guided liver biopsy for parenchymal disease: a comparison of diagnostic yield between two core biopsy needles.
Sey MS; Al-Haddad M; Imperiale TF; McGreevy K; Lin J; DeWitt JM
Gastrointest Endosc; 2016 Feb; 83(2):347-52. PubMed ID: 26278654
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. A real-world study evaluating ultrasound-guided percutaneous non-targeted liver biopsy needle failures and pathology sample-quality assessment in both end-cut and side-notch needles.
Zhong J; Allard R; Hewitson D; Weston M; Hulson O; Burbidge S; Lambie H; Kaye T; Wyatt JI; Albazaz R
Br J Radiol; 2021 Sep; 94(1125):20210475. PubMed ID: 34289324
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Determining the Optimal Number of Core Needle Biopsy Passes for Molecular Diagnostics.
Hoang NS; Ge BH; Pan LY; Ozawa MG; Kong CS; Louie JD; Shah RP
Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol; 2018 Mar; 41(3):489-495. PubMed ID: 29279975
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Optimizing EUS-guided liver biopsy sampling: comprehensive assessment of needle types and tissue acquisition techniques.
Schulman AR; Thompson CC; Odze R; Chan WW; Ryou M
Gastrointest Endosc; 2017 Feb; 85(2):419-426. PubMed ID: 27530070
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. 19 G aspiration needle versus 19 G core biopsy needle for endoscopic ultrasound-guided liver biopsy: a prospective randomized trial.
Ching-Companioni RA; Diehl DL; Johal AS; Confer BD; Khara HS
Endoscopy; 2019 Nov; 51(11):1059-1065. PubMed ID: 31342474
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Comparison of the Diagnostic Efficacy of Ultrasound-Guided Core Needle Biopsy With 18- Versus 20-Gauge Needles for Thyroid Nodules.
Ahn HS; Seo M; Ha SM; Kim HS
J Ultrasound Med; 2018 Nov; 37(11):2565-2574. PubMed ID: 29575135
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Prospective comparison of an 18-gauge versus 16-gauge needle for percutaneous liver core-needle biopsy in children.
Jing H; Xu R; Qian L; Yi Z; Shi X; Li L; Sun L; Liu Y; He E
Abdom Radiol (NY); 2024 Feb; 49(2):604-610. PubMed ID: 37930448
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Improved tissue sections for medical liver biopsies: a comparison of 16 vs 18 g biopsy needles using digital pathology.
Palmer T; Georgiades I; Treanor D; Wright A; Shah M; Khosla R; Wyatt JI
J Clin Pathol; 2014 May; 67(5):415-9. PubMed ID: 24357440
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Safety and efficacy of fluoroscopic versus ultrasound guidance for core liver biopsies in potential living related liver transplant donors: preliminary results.
Saad WE; Ryan CK; Davies MG; Fultz P; Rubens DJ; Patel NC; Sahler LG; Lee DE; Kitanosono T; Sasson T; Waldman DL
J Vasc Interv Radiol; 2006 Aug; 17(8):1307-12. PubMed ID: 16923977
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Comparison of the accuracy of US-guided biopsy of breast masses performed with 14-gauge, 16-gauge and 18-gauge automated cutting needle biopsy devices, and review of the literature.
Huang ML; Hess K; Candelaria RP; Eghtedari M; Adrada BE; Sneige N; Fornage BD
Eur Radiol; 2017 Jul; 27(7):2928-2933. PubMed ID: 27844099
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Complications After Percutaneous Ultrasound-Guided Liver Biopsy: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis of a Population of More Than 12,000 Patients From 51 Cohort Studies.
Tian G; Kong D; Jiang T; Li L
J Ultrasound Med; 2020 Jul; 39(7):1355-1365. PubMed ID: 31999005
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Comparison of the Diagnostic Yield of the Standard 22-Gauge Needle and the New 20-Gauge Forward-Bevel Core Biopsy Needle for Endoscopic Ultrasound-Guided Tissue Acquisition from Pancreatic Lesions.
Fujie S; Ishiwatari H; Sasaki K; Sato J; Matsubayashi H; Yoshida M; Ito S; Kawata N; Imai K; Kakushima N; Takizawa K; Hotta K; Ono H
Gut Liver; 2019 May; 13(3):349-355. PubMed ID: 30600677
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Comparison of EUS-guided versus percutaneous and transjugular approaches for the performance of liver biopsies.
Shuja A; Alkhasawneh A; Fialho A; Fialho A; Shukri A; Harris C; Smotherman C; Malespin M; de Melo SW
Dig Liver Dis; 2019 Jun; 51(6):826-830. PubMed ID: 30755347
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Utility and Safety of Repeated Ultrasound-Guided Core Needle Biopsy of Focal Liver Masses.
Kim JS; Won HJ; Lee SJ; Kim SY; Shin YM; Kim PN
J Ultrasound Med; 2018 Feb; 37(2):447-452. PubMed ID: 28850692
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Effect of needle gauge and lobe laterality on parenchymal liver biopsy outcome: a retrospective analysis.
Vijayaraghavan GR; Vedantham S; Rangan V; Karam A; Zheng L; Roychowdhury A; Hussain S
Abdom Imaging; 2015 Jun; 40(5):1223-9. PubMed ID: 25367814
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
