These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

140 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 31954877)

  • 1. Adaptation to mean and variance: Interrelationships between mean and variance representations in orientation perception.
    Jeong J; Chong SC
    Vision Res; 2020 Feb; 167():46-53. PubMed ID: 31954877
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Expectations and visual aftereffects.
    Pinchuk-Yacobi N; Dekel R; Sagi D
    J Vis; 2016 Dec; 16(15):19. PubMed ID: 28006069
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Direct encoding of orientation variance in the visual system.
    Norman LJ; Heywood CA; Kentridge RW
    J Vis; 2015; 15(4):3. PubMed ID: 26067349
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Tilt aftereffect due to adaptation to natural stimuli.
    Dekel R; Sagi D
    Vision Res; 2015 Dec; 117():91-9. PubMed ID: 26550954
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. The effect of perceptual contour orientation uncertainty on the tilt aftereffect.
    Erlikhman G; Singh G; Ghose T; Liu Z
    Vision Res; 2019 May; 158():126-134. PubMed ID: 30797766
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Variance aftereffect within and between sensory modalities for visual and auditory domains.
    Ueda S; Yakushijin R; Ishiguchi A
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2024 May; 86(4):1375-1385. PubMed ID: 37100981
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Surround-contingent tilt aftereffect.
    Nakashima Y; Sugita Y
    J Vis; 2014 Dec; 14(14):5. PubMed ID: 25515763
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Serial dependence in the perception of visual variance.
    Suárez-Pinilla M; Seth AK; Roseboom W
    J Vis; 2018 Jul; 18(7):4. PubMed ID: 29971350
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Adapting to an aftereffect.
    Sheth BR; Shimojo S
    J Vis; 2008 Mar; 8(3):29.1-10. PubMed ID: 18484835
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Predictive remapping of visual features beyond saccadic targets.
    He T; Fritsche M; de Lange FP
    J Vis; 2018 Dec; 18(13):20. PubMed ID: 30593063
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Aftereffect of adaptation to Glass patterns.
    Clifford CW; Weston E
    Vision Res; 2005 May; 45(11):1355-63. PubMed ID: 15743606
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Adaptation-induced blindness to sluggish stimuli.
    Motoyoshi I; Hayakawa S
    J Vis; 2010 Feb; 10(2):16.1-8. PubMed ID: 20462317
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. The reference frame of the tilt aftereffect.
    Knapen T; Rolfs M; Wexler M; Cavanagh P
    J Vis; 2010 Jan; 10(1):8.1-13. PubMed ID: 20143901
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. The reference frame of the motion aftereffect is retinotopic.
    Knapen T; Rolfs M; Cavanagh P
    J Vis; 2009 May; 9(5):16.1-7. PubMed ID: 19757894
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Spatial attention can modulate unconscious orientation processing.
    Bahrami B; Carmel D; Walsh V; Rees G; Lavie N
    Perception; 2008; 37(10):1520-8. PubMed ID: 19065856
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. The functional benefits of tilt adaptation.
    Kristjánsson Á
    Seeing Perceiving; 2011; 24(1):37-51. PubMed ID: 21406154
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Dynamic random noise shrinks the twinkling aftereffect induced by artificial scotomas.
    Reich LN; Levi DM; Frishman LJ
    Vision Res; 2000; 40(7):805-16. PubMed ID: 10683457
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Visual adaptation as optimal information transmission.
    Wainwright MJ
    Vision Res; 1999 Nov; 39(23):3960-74. PubMed ID: 10748928
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Orientation-specific aftereffects to mentally generated lines.
    Mohr HM; Linder NS; Dennis H; Sireteanu R
    Perception; 2011; 40(3):272-90. PubMed ID: 21692419
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. A test for contrast-polarity selectivity in the tilt aftereffect.
    Magnussen S; Kurtenbach W
    Perception; 1979; 8(5):523-8. PubMed ID: 503781
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.