These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

132 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 31956183)

  • 21. Assessment of the predictive value of X-ray pelvimetry and biparietal diameter in cephalopelvic disproportion.
    Mandry J; Grandjean H; Reme JM; Pastor J; Levade C; Pontonnier G
    Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol; 1983 Jul; 15(3):173-9. PubMed ID: 6617936
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. High quality imaging from sparsely sampled computed tomography data with deep learning and wavelet transform in various domains.
    Lee D; Choi S; Kim HJ
    Med Phys; 2019 Jan; 46(1):104-115. PubMed ID: 30362117
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. [Pelvimetry with compute tomography].
    Martinsen AC; Risdal M; Bay T; Drolsum A
    Tidsskr Nor Laegeforen; 2005 Aug; 125(15):2023-5. PubMed ID: 16100544
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. The cephalopelvic disproportion index. Combined fetal sonography and x-ray pelvimetry for early detection of cephalopelvic disproportion.
    Abitbol MM; Taylor UB; Castillo I; Rochelson BL
    J Reprod Med; 1991 May; 36(5):369-73. PubMed ID: 2061886
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Three-dimensional pelvimetry by computed tomography.
    Lenhard M; Johnson T; Weckbach S; Nikolaou K; Friese K; Hasbargen U
    Radiol Med; 2009 Aug; 114(5):827-34. PubMed ID: 19551346
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. A low-dose CT-pelvimetry.
    Suramo I; Torniainen P; Jouppila P; Kirkinen P; Lähde S
    Br J Radiol; 1984 Jan; 57(673):35-7. PubMed ID: 6704646
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. MR pelvimetry: prognosis for successful vaginal delivery in patients with suspected fetopelvic disproportion or breech presentation at term.
    Franz M; von Bismarck A; Delius M; Ertl-Wagner B; Deppe C; Mahner S; Hasbargen U; Hübener C
    Arch Gynecol Obstet; 2017 Feb; 295(2):351-359. PubMed ID: 28044181
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. The future of CT: deep learning reconstruction.
    McLeavy CM; Chunara MH; Gravell RJ; Rauf A; Cushnie A; Staley Talbot C; Hawkins RM
    Clin Radiol; 2021 Jun; 76(6):407-415. PubMed ID: 33637310
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Characteristics and clinical application of a treatment simulator with Ct-option.
    Verellen D; Vinh-Hung V; Bijdekerke P; Nijs F; Linthout N; Bel A; Storme G
    Radiother Oncol; 1999 Mar; 50(3):355-66. PubMed ID: 10392823
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. [CT pelvimetry: a new approach using multi detector CT and volume rendering].
    Balleyguier C; Jouanic JM; Corréas JM; Benachi A; Dumez Y; Menu Y
    J Radiol; 2003 Apr; 84(4 Pt 1):425-7. PubMed ID: 12759661
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Maternal height and external pelvimetry to predict cephalopelvic disproportion in nulliparous African women: a cohort study.
    Liselele HB; Boulvain M; Tshibangu KC; Meuris S
    BJOG; 2000 Aug; 107(8):947-52. PubMed ID: 10955423
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Computed tomographic pelvimetry.
    Lenke RR; Shuman WP
    J Reprod Med; 1986 Oct; 31(10):958-60. PubMed ID: 3783538
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Anthropometric measurements in the diagnosis of pelvic size: an analysis of maternal height and shoe size and computed tomography pelvimetric data.
    Awonuga AO; Merhi Z; Awonuga MT; Samuels TA; Waller J; Pring D
    Arch Gynecol Obstet; 2007 Nov; 276(5):523-8. PubMed ID: 17458554
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Ultra-Low-Dose Fetal CT With Model-Based Iterative Reconstruction: A Prospective Pilot Study.
    Imai R; Miyazaki O; Horiuchi T; Asano K; Nishimura G; Sago H; Nosaka S
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2017 Jun; 208(6):1365-1372. PubMed ID: 28463542
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Determining the radiation dose reduction potential for coronary calcium scanning with computed tomography: an anthropomorphic phantom study comparing filtered backprojection and the adaptive iterative dose reduction algorithm for image reconstruction.
    Blobel J; Mews J; Schuijf JD; Overlaet W
    Invest Radiol; 2013 Dec; 48(12):857-62. PubMed ID: 23917328
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Guidelines for computed tomography and magnetic resonance imaging use during pregnancy and lactation.
    Chen MM; Coakley FV; Kaimal A; Laros RK
    Obstet Gynecol; 2008 Aug; 112(2 Pt 1):333-40. PubMed ID: 18669732
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Combination of ultrasound pelvimetry and fetal sonography in predicting cephalopelvic disproportion.
    Bian X; Zhuang J; Cheng X
    Chin Med J (Engl); 1997 Dec; 110(12):942-5. PubMed ID: 9772407
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Comparative dose levels between CT-scanner and slot-scanning device (EOS system) in pregnant women pelvimetry.
    Ben Abdennebi A; Aubry S; Ounalli L; Fayache MS; Delabrousse E; Petegnief Y
    Phys Med; 2017 Jan; 33():77-86. PubMed ID: 27993442
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. [Dosimetry comparison of pelvimetry methods using conventional radiographs and CT].
    Resten A; Mausoléo F; Suissa M; Valéro M; Taylor S; Musset D
    J Radiol; 2001 Sep; 82(9 Pt 1):991-6. PubMed ID: 11591927
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Computed tomography pelvimetry: accuracy and radiation dose compared with conventional pelvimetry.
    Morris CW; Heggie JC; Acton CM
    Australas Radiol; 1993 May; 37(2):186-91. PubMed ID: 8512510
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.