These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

123 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 31956183)

  • 41. Computed tomography pelvimetry: accuracy and radiation dose compared with conventional pelvimetry.
    Morris CW; Heggie JC; Acton CM
    Australas Radiol; 1993 May; 37(2):186-91. PubMed ID: 8512510
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 42. Dual-energy, standard and low-kVp contrast-enhanced CT-cholangiography: a comparative analysis of image quality and radiation exposure.
    Stiller W; Schwarzwaelder CB; Sommer CM; Veloza S; Radeleff BA; Kauczor HU
    Eur J Radiol; 2012 Jul; 81(7):1405-12. PubMed ID: 21458939
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 43. Study on the cephalopelvic relationship with cephalic presentation in nulliparous full-term Chinese pregnant women by MRI with three-dimensional reconstruction.
    Li YG; Chen CL; Liao KD; Yu YH; Xu YK; Wang Y; Qiao W; Liu P
    Arch Gynecol Obstet; 2018 Aug; 298(2):433-441. PubMed ID: 29948169
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 44. Pelvimetry by digital radiography: a low-dose examination.
    Federle MP; Cohen HA; Rosenwein MF; Brant-Zawadzki MN; Cann CE
    Radiology; 1982 Jun; 143(3):733-5. PubMed ID: 7079500
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 45. [New aspects of radiologic pelvimetry. Digital image intensification radiography: preliminary results of validation possibilities and results in various types of pelvic disproportion].
    Wischnik A; Lehmann KJ; Busch HP; Englmeier KH; Sterescu D; Georgi M; Melchert F
    Z Geburtshilfe Perinatol; 1989; 193(3):145-51. PubMed ID: 2763609
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 46. [Dosimetry comparison of pelvimetry methods using conventional radiologic technic and x-ray scanner].
    Germond M; Raimondi S; Schnyder P; de Grandi P
    J Gynecol Obstet Biol Reprod (Paris); 1989; 18(8):1002-6. PubMed ID: 2621327
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 47. Trends in the use of pelvimetry techniques.
    Thomas SM; Bees NR; Adam EJ
    Clin Radiol; 1998 Apr; 53(4):293-5. PubMed ID: 9585047
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 48. Ultra-low dose CT attenuation correction for PET/CT: analysis of sparse view data acquisition and reconstruction algorithms.
    Rui X; Cheng L; Long Y; Fu L; Alessio AM; Asma E; Kinahan PE; De Man B
    Phys Med Biol; 2015 Oct; 60(19):7437-60. PubMed ID: 26352168
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 49. Value of X-ray pelvimetry in primiparas. II: influence on management of labor.
    Poma PA
    J Natl Med Assoc; 1982 Mar; 74(3):267-72. PubMed ID: 7120463
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 50. A comparative study of X-ray pelvimetry and CT pelvimetry.
    Raman S; Samuel D; Suresh K
    Aust N Z J Obstet Gynaecol; 1991 Aug; 31(3):217-20. PubMed ID: 1804081
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 51. [Helical CT pelvimetry: advantages of a low dose volume acquisition technique].
    Breidt D; Bouquigny F; Clément JP; Menéchal P; Levert M; Quéreux C; Piérot L
    J Radiol; 2003 Sep; 84(9):1027-30. PubMed ID: 13679759
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 52. Low dose pelvimetry with biplane digital radiography.
    Lotz H; Ekelund L; Hietala SO; Eriksson L; Wiklund DE; Wickman G
    Acta Radiol; 1987; 28(5):577-80. PubMed ID: 2960351
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 53. [Caesarean section for cephalo-pelvic disproportion performed without evidence. Does the radiological pelvimetry has a place in obstetrics today?].
    Santín G
    Ginecol Obstet Mex; 2011 Jun; 79(6):368-72. PubMed ID: 21966828
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 54. [Is there a role for X-ray pelvimetry in the twenty-first century?].
    Rozenberg P
    Gynecol Obstet Fertil; 2007 Jan; 35(1):6-12. PubMed ID: 17188014
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 55. An evaluation of the usefulness of x-ray pelvimetry: comparison of the Thoms and modified Ball methods with manual pelvimetry.
    Fine EA; Bracken M; Berkowitz RL
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 1980 May; 137(1):15-20. PubMed ID: 7369283
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 56. A mathematical approach to problems of cephalopelvic disproportion at the pelvic inlet.
    Yamazaki H; Uchida K
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 1983 Sep; 147(1):25-37. PubMed ID: 6614082
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 57. Standard and reduced radiation dose liver CT images: adaptive statistical iterative reconstruction versus model-based iterative reconstruction-comparison of findings and image quality.
    Shuman WP; Chan KT; Busey JM; Mitsumori LM; Choi E; Koprowicz KM; Kanal KM
    Radiology; 2014 Dec; 273(3):793-800. PubMed ID: 25170546
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 58. A narrow pelvic outlet increases the risk for emergency cesarean section.
    Stålberg K; Bodestedt A; Lyrenäs S; Axelsson O
    Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand; 2006; 85(7):821-4. PubMed ID: 16817080
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 59. A deep convolutional neural network using directional wavelets for low-dose X-ray CT reconstruction.
    Kang E; Min J; Ye JC
    Med Phys; 2017 Oct; 44(10):e360-e375. PubMed ID: 29027238
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 60. Improvement in CT pelvimetry.
    Wiesen EJ; Crass JR; Bellon EM; Ashmead GG; Cohen AM
    Radiology; 1991 Jan; 178(1):259-62. PubMed ID: 1984315
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.