These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

218 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 31956740)

  • 1. A primer on model selection using the Akaike Information Criterion.
    Portet S
    Infect Dis Model; 2020; 5():111-128. PubMed ID: 31956740
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Bootstrap Approximation of Model Selection Probabilities for Multimodel Inference Frameworks.
    Dajles A; Cavanaugh J
    Entropy (Basel); 2024 Jul; 26(7):. PubMed ID: 39056962
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Comparison of the Akaike Information Criterion, the Schwarz criterion and the F test as guides to model selection.
    Ludden TM; Beal SL; Sheiner LB
    J Pharmacokinet Biopharm; 1994 Oct; 22(5):431-45. PubMed ID: 7791040
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Model selection for geostatistical models.
    Hoeting JA; Davis RA; Merton AA; Thompson SE
    Ecol Appl; 2006 Feb; 16(1):87-98. PubMed ID: 16705963
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Complexity vs. simplicity: groundwater model ranking using information criteria.
    Engelhardt I; De Aguinaga JG; Mikat H; Schüth C; Liedl R
    Ground Water; 2014; 52(4):573-83. PubMed ID: 23750914
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Best-subset model selection based on multitudinal assessments of likelihood improvements.
    Carter KD; Cavanaugh JE
    J Appl Stat; 2020; 47(13-15):2384-2420. PubMed ID: 35707408
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. SysBioMed report: advancing systems biology for medical applications.
    Wolkenhauer O; Fell D; De Meyts P; Blüthgen N; Herzel H; Le Novère N; Höfer T; Schürrle K; van Leeuwen I
    IET Syst Biol; 2009 May; 3(3):131-6. PubMed ID: 19449974
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Variable selection in generalized random coefficient autoregressive models.
    Zhao Z; Liu Y; Peng C
    J Inequal Appl; 2018; 2018(1):82. PubMed ID: 29674836
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Model Selection for Multilevel Mixture Rasch Models.
    Sen S; Cohen AS; Kim SH
    Appl Psychol Meas; 2019 Jun; 43(4):272-289. PubMed ID: 31156280
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Marker selection by Akaike information criterion and Bayesian information criterion.
    Li W; Nyholt DR
    Genet Epidemiol; 2001; 21 Suppl 1():S272-7. PubMed ID: 11793681
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Testing multiple polynomial models for eye-tracker calibration.
    Lara-Alvarez C; Gonzalez-Herrera F
    Behav Res Methods; 2020 Dec; 52(6):2506-2514. PubMed ID: 32468282
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Model selection for time-activity curves: the corrected Akaike information criterion and the F-test.
    Kletting P; Glatting G
    Z Med Phys; 2009; 19(3):200-6. PubMed ID: 19761098
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Selection criteria for linear regression models to estimate individual tree biomasses in the Atlantic Rain Forest, Brazil.
    Sanquetta CR; Dalla Corte AP; Behling A; de Oliveira Piva LR; Péllico Netto S; Rodrigues AL; Sanquetta MNI
    Carbon Balance Manag; 2018 Dec; 13(1):25. PubMed ID: 30535635
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. AIC model selection using Akaike weights.
    Wagenmakers EJ; Farrell S
    Psychon Bull Rev; 2004 Feb; 11(1):192-6. PubMed ID: 15117008
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Bridging Offline Functional Model Carrying Aging-Specific Growth Rate Information and Recombinant Protein Expression: Entropic Extension of Akaike Information Criterion.
    Urniezius R; Kemesis B; Simutis R
    Entropy (Basel); 2021 Aug; 23(8):. PubMed ID: 34441197
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Kinetics of contaminant desorption from soil: comparison of model formulations using the Akaike information criterion.
    Saffron CM; Park JH; Dale BE; Voice TC
    Environ Sci Technol; 2006 Dec; 40(24):7662-7. PubMed ID: 17256510
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Model selection for incomplete and design-based samples.
    Hens N; Aerts M; Molenberghs G
    Stat Med; 2006 Jul; 25(14):2502-20. PubMed ID: 16596577
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Model selection for mixtures of mutagenetic trees.
    Yin J; Beerenwinkel N; Rahnenführer J; Lengauer T
    Stat Appl Genet Mol Biol; 2006; 5():Article17. PubMed ID: 17049028
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Resampling methods for model fitting and model selection.
    Babu GJ
    J Biopharm Stat; 2011 Nov; 21(6):1177-86. PubMed ID: 22023685
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Comparison of model selection for regression.
    Cherkassky V; Ma Y
    Neural Comput; 2003 Jul; 15(7):1691-714. PubMed ID: 12816572
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 11.