These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

155 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 31957070)

  • 1. The effect of systemic antibiotics on clinical and patient-reported outcome measures of oral implant therapy with simultaneous guided bone regeneration.
    Payer M; Tan WC; Han J; Ivanovski S; Mattheos N; Pjetursson BE; Zhuang L; Fokas G; Wong MCM; Acham S; Lang NP;
    Clin Oral Implants Res; 2020 May; 31(5):442-451. PubMed ID: 31957070
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Conventional free-hand, dynamic navigation and static guided implant surgery produce similar short-term patient-reported outcome measures and experiences.
    Afrashtehfar KI
    Evid Based Dent; 2021 Dec; 22(4):143-145. PubMed ID: 34916642
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Esthetics and Patient-Reported Outcomes of Implants Placed with Guided Bone Regeneration and Complete Native Bone: A Prospective Controlled Clinical Trial.
    Jonker BP; Wolvius EB; van der Tas JT; Tahmaseb A; Pijpe J
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2020; 35(2):406-414. PubMed ID: 32142578
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Guided bone regeneration with and without a bone substitute at single post-extractive implants: 1-year post-loading results from a pragmatic multicentre randomised controlled trial.
    De Angelis N; Felice P; Pellegrino G; Camurati A; Gambino P; Esposito M
    Eur J Oral Implantol; 2011; 4(4):313-25. PubMed ID: 22282729
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. A randomized controlled clinical multicenter trial comparing the clinical and histological performance of a new, modified polylactide-co-glycolide acid membrane to an expanded polytetrafluorethylene membrane in guided bone regeneration procedures.
    Schneider D; Weber FE; Grunder U; Andreoni C; Burkhardt R; Jung RE
    Clin Oral Implants Res; 2014 Feb; 25(2):150-8. PubMed ID: 23432666
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Effect of systemic antibiotics on clinical and patient-reported outcomes of implant therapy - a multicenter randomized controlled clinical trial.
    Tan WC; Ong M; Han J; Mattheos N; Pjetursson BE; Tsai AY; Sanz I; Wong MC; Lang NP;
    Clin Oral Implants Res; 2014 Feb; 25(2):185-93. PubMed ID: 23347336
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Retrospective success and survival rates of dental implants placed with simultaneous bone augmentation in partially edentulous patients.
    Bazrafshan N; Darby I
    Clin Oral Implants Res; 2014 Jul; 25(7):768-73. PubMed ID: 23647237
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Interventions for replacing missing teeth: antibiotics at dental implant placement to prevent complications.
    Esposito M; Grusovin MG; Worthington HV
    Cochrane Database Syst Rev; 2013 Jul; 2013(7):CD004152. PubMed ID: 23904048
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. The influence of prophylactic antibiotic administration on post-operative morbidity in dental implant surgery. A prospective double blind randomized controlled clinical trial.
    Nolan R; Kemmoona M; Polyzois I; Claffey N
    Clin Oral Implants Res; 2014 Feb; 25(2):252-9. PubMed ID: 23406290
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. A randomized controlled study comparing guided bone regeneration with connective tissue graft to re-establish buccal convexity: One-year aesthetic and patient-reported outcomes.
    De Bruyckere T; Cosyn J; Younes F; Hellyn J; Bekx J; Cleymaet R; Eghbali A
    Clin Oral Implants Res; 2020 Jun; 31(6):507-516. PubMed ID: 32011032
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Clinical and radiographic comparison of implants in regenerated or native bone: 5-year results.
    Benić GI; Jung RE; Siegenthaler DW; Hämmerle CH
    Clin Oral Implants Res; 2009 May; 20(5):507-13. PubMed ID: 19302239
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. The effects of guided bone regeneration and grafting on implants placed into immediate extraction sockets. An experimental study in dogs.
    Kohal RJ; Mellas P; Hürzeler MB; Trejo PM; Morrison E; Caffesse RG
    J Periodontol; 1998 Aug; 69(8):927-37. PubMed ID: 9736376
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Guided bone regeneration around endosseous implants with anorganic bovine bone mineral. A randomized controlled trial comparing bioabsorbable versus non-resorbable barriers.
    Carpio L; Loza J; Lynch S; Genco R
    J Periodontol; 2000 Nov; 71(11):1743-9. PubMed ID: 11128923
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Cone beam computed tomography evaluation of regenerated buccal bone 5 years after simultaneous implant placement and guided bone regeneration procedures--a randomized, controlled clinical trial.
    Jung RE; Benic GI; Scherrer D; Hämmerle CH
    Clin Oral Implants Res; 2015; 26(1):28-34. PubMed ID: 24299007
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Horizontal ridge augmentation with guided bone regeneration using particulate xenogenic bone substitutes with or without autogenous block grafts: A randomized controlled trial.
    Mendoza-Azpur G; de la Fuente A; Chavez E; Valdivia E; Khouly I
    Clin Implant Dent Relat Res; 2019 Aug; 21(4):521-530. PubMed ID: 30884111
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Single stage surgery combining transmucosal implant placement with guided bone regeneration and bioresorbable materials.
    Hämmerle CH; Lang NP
    Clin Oral Implants Res; 2001 Feb; 12(1):9-18. PubMed ID: 11168266
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Guided bone regeneration of peri-implant defects with particulated and block xenogenic bone substitutes.
    Benic GI; Thoma DS; Muñoz F; Sanz Martin I; Jung RE; Hämmerle CH
    Clin Oral Implants Res; 2016 May; 27(5):567-76. PubMed ID: 26073212
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Marginal soft tissue recession after lateral guided bone regeneration at implant site: A long-term study with at least 5 years of loading.
    Cairo F; Nieri M; Cavalcanti R; Landi L; Rupe A; Sforza NM; Pace R; Barbato L
    Clin Oral Implants Res; 2020 Nov; 31(11):1116-1124. PubMed ID: 32875633
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Long-term outcome of implants placed with guided bone regeneration (GBR) using resorbable and non-resorbable membranes after 12-14 years.
    Jung RE; Fenner N; Hämmerle CH; Zitzmann NU
    Clin Oral Implants Res; 2013 Oct; 24(10):1065-73. PubMed ID: 22697628
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. A randomized controlled trial comparing guided bone regeneration to connective tissue graft to re-establish buccal convexity at dental implant sites: Three-year results.
    Bouckaert E; De Bruyckere T; Eghbali A; Younes F; Wessels R; Cosyn J
    Clin Oral Implants Res; 2022 May; 33(5):461-471. PubMed ID: 35187731
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.