These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

138 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 31957511)

  • 21. The Static-99R Is Not Valid For Women: Predictive Validity in 739 Females Who Have Sexually Offended.
    Marshall E; Miller HA; Cortoni F; Helmus LM
    Sex Abuse; 2021 Sep; 33(6):631-653. PubMed ID: 32659180
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Factor structure and validation of the juvenile sex offender assessment protocol (J-SOAP).
    Righthand S; Prentky R; Knight R; Carpenter E; Hecker JE; Nangle D
    Sex Abuse; 2005 Jan; 17(1):13-30. PubMed ID: 15757002
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Predictive Accuracy of Violence Risk Scale-Sexual Offender Version Risk and Change Scores in Treated Canadian Aboriginal and Non-Aboriginal Sexual Offenders.
    Olver ME; Sowden JN; Kingston DA; Nicholaichuk TP; Gordon A; Beggs Christofferson SM; Wong SCP
    Sex Abuse; 2018 Apr; 30(3):254-275. PubMed ID: 27189355
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Predictive validity of adult risk assessment tools with juveniles who offended sexually.
    Ralston CA; Epperson DL
    Psychol Assess; 2013 Sep; 25(3):905-16. PubMed ID: 23647039
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. The predictive properties of dynamic sex offender risk assessment instruments: A meta-analysis.
    van den Berg JW; Smid W; Schepers K; Wever E; van Beek D; Janssen E; Gijs L
    Psychol Assess; 2018 Feb; 30(2):179-191. PubMed ID: 28368169
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Assessing risk of sexually abusive behavior among youth in a child welfare sample.
    Prentky RA; Li NC; Righthand S; Schuler A; Cavanaugh D; Lee AF
    Behav Sci Law; 2010; 28(1):24-45. PubMed ID: 20101590
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Changes in J-SOAP-II and SAVRY Scores Over the Course of Residential, Cognitive-Behavioral Treatment for Adolescent Sexual Offending.
    Viljoen JL; Gray AL; Shaffer C; Latzman NE; Scalora MJ; Ullman D
    Sex Abuse; 2017 Jun; 29(4):342-374. PubMed ID: 26199271
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Protective factors and recidivism in accused juveniles who sexually offended.
    Klein V; Rettenberger M; Yoon D; Köhler N; Briken P
    Sex Abuse; 2015 Feb; 27(1):71-90. PubMed ID: 25351199
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Spanish Validation of the Child Pornography Offender Risk Tool.
    Soldino V; Carbonell-Vayá EJ; Seigfried-Spellar KC
    Sex Abuse; 2021 Aug; 33(5):503-528. PubMed ID: 32482122
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Prediction of adolescent sexual reoffending: a meta-analysis of the J-SOAP-II, ERASOR, J-SORRAT-II, and Static-99.
    Viljoen JL; Mordell S; Beneteau JL
    Law Hum Behav; 2012 Oct; 36(5):423-38. PubMed ID: 22353046
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Juvenile Psychopathy and Community Treatment Response in Youth Adjudicated for Sexual Offenses.
    Rojas EY; Olver ME
    Int J Offender Ther Comp Criminol; 2022 Nov; 66(15):1575-1602. PubMed ID: 33588613
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. An investigation of the validity and reliability of the Criminal Sentiments Scale in a sample of treated sex offenders.
    Witte TD; Di Placido C; Gu D; Wong SC
    Sex Abuse; 2006 Jul; 18(3):249-58. PubMed ID: 16988891
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Treatment impact of an integrated sex offender program as measured by J-SOAP-II.
    Rehfuss MC; Underwood LA; Enright M; Hill S; Marshall R; Tipton P; West L; Warren K
    J Correct Health Care; 2013 Apr; 19(2):113-23. PubMed ID: 23475853
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Dynamic Risk Assessment of Sexual Offenders: Validity and Dimensional Structure of the Stable-2007.
    Etzler S; Eher R; Rettenberger M
    Assessment; 2020 Jun; 27(4):822-839. PubMed ID: 29405755
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Predictive accuracy of Static-99R across different racial/ethnic groups: A meta-analysis.
    Ahmed S; Lee SC; Helmus LM
    Law Hum Behav; 2023 Feb; 47(1):275-291. PubMed ID: 36931863
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. An examination of latent constructs of dynamic sexual violence risk and need as a function of indigenous and nonindigenous ancestry.
    Olver ME; Kingston DA; Sowden JN
    Psychol Serv; 2021 Nov; 18(4):484-496. PubMed ID: 31999157
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Differences in the predictive validity of actuarial risk assessments in relation to sex offender type.
    Bartosh DL; Garby T; Lewis D; Gray S
    Int J Offender Ther Comp Criminol; 2003 Aug; 47(4):422-38. PubMed ID: 12971183
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Does Reassessment Improve Prediction? A Prospective Study of the Sexual Offender Treatment Intervention and Progress Scale (SOTIPS).
    Hanson RK; Newstrom N; Brouillette-Alarie S; Thornton D; Robinson BBE; Miner MH
    Int J Offender Ther Comp Criminol; 2021 Dec; 65(16):1775-1803. PubMed ID: 33272067
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Cross-validation of the risk matrix 2000 sexual and violent scales.
    Craig LA; Beech A; Browne KD
    J Interpers Violence; 2006 May; 21(5):612-33. PubMed ID: 16574636
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. A Preliminary Analysis of Sexual Recidivism and Predictive Validity of the Static-99R in Men Discharged From State Hospitals Pursuant to California's Sexually Violent Predator Act.
    Azizian A; Olver ME; Rokop J; D'Orazio DM
    Sex Abuse; 2022 Apr; 34(3):319-340. PubMed ID: 34154482
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.