These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

156 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 31958017)

  • 1. Extrinsic Convergent Validity Evidence to Prevent Jingle and Jangle Fallacies.
    Gonzalez O; MacKinnon DP; Muniz FB
    Multivariate Behav Res; 2021; 56(1):3-19. PubMed ID: 31958017
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. The jingle-jangle of work-nonwork balance: A comprehensive and meta-analytic review of its meaning and measurement.
    Casper WJ; Vaziri H; Wayne JH; DeHauw S; Greenhaus J
    J Appl Psychol; 2018 Feb; 103(2):182-214. PubMed ID: 29016161
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Understanding Speech Amid the Jingle and Jangle: Recommendations for Improving Measurement Practices in Listening Effort Research.
    Strand JF; Ray L; Dillman-Hasso NH; Villanueva J; Brown VA
    Audit Percept Cogn; 2020; 3(4):169-188. PubMed ID: 34240011
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Why Are Self-Report and Behavioral Measures Weakly Correlated?
    Dang J; King KM; Inzlicht M
    Trends Cogn Sci; 2020 Apr; 24(4):267-269. PubMed ID: 32160564
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Welcome to the Jangle: Comparing the Empirical Profiles of the "Dark" Factor and Antagonism.
    Rose L; Sleep CE; Lynam DR; Miller JD
    Assessment; 2023 Dec; 30(8):2626-2643. PubMed ID: 36129155
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Sibling Constructs: What Are They, Why Do They Matter, and How Should You Handle Them?
    Lawson KM; Robins RW
    Pers Soc Psychol Rev; 2021 Nov; 25(4):344-366. PubMed ID: 34663112
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Empathy, an important but problematic concept.
    Hall JA; Schwartz R
    J Soc Psychol; 2022 Jan; 162(1):1-6. PubMed ID: 34978951
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. It looks like construct validity, but look again: Comment on Clutterbuck et al. (2021) and recommendations for test developers in the broad "empathy" domain.
    Murphy BA; Hall JA; Duong F
    Psychol Assess; 2022 Apr; 34(4):397-404. PubMed ID: 35377686
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Quantifying construct validity: two simple measures.
    Westen D; Rosenthal R
    J Pers Soc Psychol; 2003 Mar; 84(3):608-18. PubMed ID: 12635920
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Examining the construct validity of affective judgments of physical activity measures.
    Chmielewski M; Sala M; Tang R; Baldwin A
    Psychol Assess; 2016 Sep; 28(9):1128-41. PubMed ID: 27537007
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. What do Demand-Control and Effort-Reward work stress questionnaires really measure? A discriminant content validity study of relevance and representativeness of measures.
    Bell C; Johnston D; Allan J; Pollard B; Johnston M
    Br J Health Psychol; 2017 May; 22(2):295-329. PubMed ID: 28271592
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. A Psychometric Evaluation of the Short Grit Scale: A Closer Look at its Factor Structure and Scale Functioning.
    Gonzalez O; Canning JR; Smyth H; MacKinnon DP
    Eur J Psychol Assess; 2020 Jul; 36(4):646-657. PubMed ID: 33840984
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. [Evaluation of worry: validation of a French translation of the Penn State Worry Questionnaire].
    Gosselin P; Dugas MJ; Ladouceur R; Freeston MH
    Encephale; 2001; 27(5):475-84. PubMed ID: 11760697
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Discriminant content validity: a quantitative methodology for assessing content of theory-based measures, with illustrative applications.
    Johnston M; Dixon D; Hart J; Glidewell L; Schröder C; Pollard B
    Br J Health Psychol; 2014 May; 19(2):240-57. PubMed ID: 24628841
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Contemporary measures of approach and avoidance goal orientations: similarities and differences.
    Smith M; Duda J; Allen J; Hall H
    Br J Educ Psychol; 2002 Jun; 72(Pt 2):155-90. PubMed ID: 12028607
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Resilience in organization-related research: An integrative conceptual review across disciplines and levels of analysis.
    Raetze S; Duchek S; Maynard MT; Wohlgemuth M
    J Appl Psychol; 2022 Jun; 107(6):867-897. PubMed ID: 34766796
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. The jingle-jangle fallacy in adolescent autonomy in the family: in search of an underlying structure.
    Van Petegem S; Vansteenkiste M; Beyers W
    J Youth Adolesc; 2013 Jul; 42(7):994-1014. PubMed ID: 23111845
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Suitability of the Epworth Sleepiness Scale (ESS) for Economic Evaluation: An Assessment of Its Convergent and Discriminant Validity.
    Kaambwa B; Mpundu-Kaambwa C; Adams R; Appleton S; Martin S; Wittert G
    Behav Sleep Med; 2018; 16(5):448-470. PubMed ID: 27754703
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. The structural and convergent validity of three commonly used measures of self-management in persons with neurological conditions.
    Kephart G; Packer TL; Audulv Å; Warner G
    Qual Life Res; 2019 Feb; 28(2):545-556. PubMed ID: 30390217
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Reliability and Validity of the Self-Rating Scale as a Measure of Self-Criticism.
    Glenn LE; Pepper CM
    Assessment; 2023 Jul; 30(5):1557-1568. PubMed ID: 35815400
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.