These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

139 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 31958149)

  • 1. Against the De Minimis Principle.
    Lundgren B; Stefánsson HO
    Risk Anal; 2020 May; 40(5):908-914. PubMed ID: 31958149
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. The future of the de minimis concept.
    Davis JP
    Health Phys; 1988 Aug; 55(2):379-82. PubMed ID: 3410707
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. An analysis of the de minimis strategy for risk management.
    Mumpower J
    Risk Anal; 1986 Dec; 6(4):437-46. PubMed ID: 3110874
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Risk and Rationality in Adolescent Decision Making: Implications for Theory, Practice, and Public Policy.
    Reyna VF; Farley F
    Psychol Sci Public Interest; 2006 Sep; 7(1):1-44. PubMed ID: 26158695
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Risk management frameworks for human health and environmental risks.
    Jardine C; Hrudey S; Shortreed J; Craig L; Krewski D; Furgal C; McColl S
    J Toxicol Environ Health B Crit Rev; 2003; 6(6):569-720. PubMed ID: 14698953
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Structure-based thresholds of toxicological concern (TTC): guidance for application to substances present at low levels in the diet.
    Kroes R; Renwick AG; Cheeseman M; Kleiner J; Mangelsdorf I; Piersma A; Schilter B; Schlatter J; van Schothorst F; Vos JG; Würtzen G;
    Food Chem Toxicol; 2004 Jan; 42(1):65-83. PubMed ID: 14630131
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Derivation of a target level of lead in soil at residential sites corresponding to a de minimis contribution to blood lead concentration.
    Stern AH
    Risk Anal; 1994 Dec; 14(6):1049-56. PubMed ID: 7846312
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. A proposal for a generally applicable de minimis dose.
    Kocher DC
    Health Phys; 1987 Aug; 53(2):117-21. PubMed ID: 3112041
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Extending the threshold of regulation concept: de minimis limits for carcinogens and mutagens.
    Fiori JM; Meyerhoff RD
    Regul Toxicol Pharmacol; 2002 Apr; 35(2 Pt 1):209-16. PubMed ID: 12052005
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Decision Making on Behalf of Children: Understanding the Role of the Harm Principle.
    Diekema DS
    J Clin Ethics; 2019; 30(3):207-212. PubMed ID: 31573963
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Analysing and exemplifying forensic conclusion criteria in terms of Bayesian decision theory.
    Biedermann A; Bozza S; Taroni F
    Sci Justice; 2018 Mar; 58(2):159-165. PubMed ID: 29526268
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Adding insult to injury?: the untoward impact of requiring more than de minimis injury in an Eighth Amendment excessive force case.
    Hoffman RD
    Fordham Law Rev; 2009 May; 77(6):3163-205. PubMed ID: 19618553
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. [The precautionary principle: advantages and risks].
    Tubiana M
    J Chir (Paris); 2001 Apr; 138(2):68-80. PubMed ID: 11319454
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. [Conclusions. The precautionary principle: its advantages and risks].
    Tubiana M
    Bull Acad Natl Med; 2000; 184(5):969-93. PubMed ID: 11077719
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Letter to the Editor: CONVERGENCES AND DIVERGENCES IN THE ICD-11 VS. DSM-5 CLASSIFICATION OF MOOD DISORDERS.
    Cerbo AD
    Turk Psikiyatri Derg; 2021; 32(4):293-295. PubMed ID: 34964106
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Is American environmental policy ready for de minimis risks in water?
    Benbrook CM
    Regul Toxicol Pharmacol; 1988 Sep; 8(3):300-7. PubMed ID: 3238061
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Measuring and comparing risks to establish a de minimis risk level.
    Wilson R
    Regul Toxicol Pharmacol; 1988 Sep; 8(3):267-82. PubMed ID: 3238058
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. The implications of competing risks and direct treatment disutility in cardiovascular disease and osteoporotic fracture: risk prediction and cost effectiveness analysis.
    Guthrie B; Rogers G; Livingstone S; Morales DR; Donnan P; Davis S; Youn JH; Hainsworth R; Thompson A; Payne K
    Health Soc Care Deliv Res; 2024 Feb; 12(4):1-275. PubMed ID: 38420962
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. The precautionary principle is incoherent.
    Peterson M
    Risk Anal; 2006 Jun; 26(3):595-601. PubMed ID: 16834620
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Is expected utility theory normative for medical decision making?
    Cohen BJ
    Med Decis Making; 1996; 16(1):1-6. PubMed ID: 8717589
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.