These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

106 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 31958743)

  • 1. Are Superficially Dissimilar Analogs better retrieved than Superficially Similar Disanalogs?
    Raynal L; Clément E; Sander E
    Acta Psychol (Amst); 2020 Feb; 203():102989. PubMed ID: 31958743
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. The Role of Surface Similarity in Analogical Retrieval: Bridging the Gap Between the Naturalistic and the Experimental Traditions.
    Trench M; Minervino RA
    Cogn Sci; 2015 Aug; 39(6):1292-319. PubMed ID: 25377167
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Construction, integration, and mind wandering in reading.
    Dixon P; Bortolussi M
    Can J Exp Psychol; 2013 Mar; 67(1):1-10. PubMed ID: 23398525
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. The effects of similarity of theme and instantiation in analogical reasoning.
    Yanowitz KL
    Am J Psychol; 2001; 114(4):547-67. PubMed ID: 11789340
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. The roles of similarity in transfer: separating retrievability from inferential soundness.
    Gentner D; Rattermann MJ; Forbus KD
    Cogn Psychol; 1993 Oct; 25(4):524-75. PubMed ID: 8243045
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Promoting interdomain analogical transfer: When creating a problem helps to solve a problem.
    Minervino RA; Olguín V; Trench M
    Mem Cognit; 2017 Feb; 45(2):221-232. PubMed ID: 27718141
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Seek, and ye shall find: Differences between spontaneous and voluntary analogical retrieval.
    Trench M; Olguín V; Minervino R
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2016; 69(4):698-712. PubMed ID: 26035308
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Encoding effects of remindings.
    Ross BH; Bradshaw GL
    Mem Cognit; 1994 Sep; 22(5):591-605. PubMed ID: 7968555
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. The role of item similarity in part-list cueing impairment.
    Aslan A; Bauml KH
    Memory; 2009 Oct; 17(7):697-707. PubMed ID: 19575327
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Global Processing Styles Facilitate the Discovery of Structural Similarity.
    Li J; Zhang X; Zheng H; Lu Q; Fan G
    Psychol Rep; 2019 Oct; 122(5):1755-1765. PubMed ID: 30060714
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. How analogies are generated: the roles of structural and superficial similarity.
    Blanchette I; Dunbar K
    Mem Cognit; 2000 Jan; 28(1):108-24. PubMed ID: 10714143
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Credible narrators and misinformed readers.
    Houghton KJ; Poirier RC; Klin CM
    Mem Cognit; 2023 May; 51(4):825-844. PubMed ID: 36450939
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. The functional locus of intrusions: encoding or retrieval?
    Dalla Barba G; Mantovan MC; Traykov L; Rieu D; Laurent A; Ermani M; Devouche E
    J Clin Exp Neuropsychol; 2002 Aug; 24(5):633-41. PubMed ID: 12187446
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Effect of presentation modality on immediate and delayed recall in individuals with Alzheimer's disease.
    Mahendra N; Bayles KA; Harris FP
    Am J Speech Lang Pathol; 2005 May; 14(2):144-55. PubMed ID: 15989389
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Dissimilar items benefit from phonological similarity in serial recall.
    Farrell S; Lewandowsky S
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2003 Sep; 29(5):838-49. PubMed ID: 14516217
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Preventing inert knowledge: Category status promotes spontaneous structure-based retrieval of prior knowledge.
    Snoddy S; Kurtz KJ
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2021 Apr; 47(4):571-607. PubMed ID: 33151719
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Young Children's Exposure to Rhyming and Nonrhyming Stories: A Structural Analysis of Recall.
    Hayes DS
    J Genet Psychol; 1999 Sep; 160(3):280-293. PubMed ID: 28136016
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. The effects of surface and structural feature matches on the access of story analogs.
    Catrambone R
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2002 Mar; 28(2):318-34. PubMed ID: 11911387
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Recent study, but not retrieval, of knowledge protects against learning errors.
    Mullet HG; Umanath S; Marsh EJ
    Mem Cognit; 2014 Nov; 42(8):1239-49. PubMed ID: 24972561
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. The influence of story context on a working memory span task.
    Schroeder PJ; Copeland DE; Bies-Hernandez NJ
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2012; 65(3):488-500. PubMed ID: 22059732
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.