456 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 31959124)
1. Comparison of multiple algorithms to reliably detect structural variants in pears.
Liu Y; Zhang M; Sun J; Chang W; Sun M; Zhang S; Wu J
BMC Genomics; 2020 Jan; 21(1):61. PubMed ID: 31959124
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Comparison of structural variants detected by PacBio-CLR and ONT sequencing in pear.
Liu Y; Zhang M; Wang R; Li B; Jiang Y; Sun M; Chang Y; Wu J
BMC Genomics; 2022 Dec; 23(1):830. PubMed ID: 36517766
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. MetaSV: an accurate and integrative structural-variant caller for next generation sequencing.
Mohiyuddin M; Mu JC; Li J; Bani Asadi N; Gerstein MB; Abyzov A; Wong WH; Lam HY
Bioinformatics; 2015 Aug; 31(16):2741-4. PubMed ID: 25861968
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. SVLR: Genome Structural Variant Detection Using Long-Read Sequencing Data.
Gu W; Zhou A; Wang L; Sun S; Cui X; Zhu D
J Comput Biol; 2021 Aug; 28(8):774-788. PubMed ID: 33973820
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Benchmarking long-read aligners and SV callers for structural variation detection in Oxford nanopore sequencing data.
Helal AA; Saad BT; Saad MT; Mosaad GS; Aboshanab KM
Sci Rep; 2024 Mar; 14(1):6160. PubMed ID: 38486064
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Assessing structural variation in a personal genome-towards a human reference diploid genome.
English AC; Salerno WJ; Hampton OA; Gonzaga-Jauregui C; Ambreth S; Ritter DI; Beck CR; Davis CF; Dahdouli M; Ma S; Carroll A; Veeraraghavan N; Bruestle J; Drees B; Hastie A; Lam ET; White S; Mishra P; Wang M; Han Y; Zhang F; Stankiewicz P; Wheeler DA; Reid JG; Muzny DM; Rogers J; Sabo A; Worley KC; Lupski JR; Boerwinkle E; Gibbs RA
BMC Genomics; 2015 Apr; 16(1):286. PubMed ID: 25886820
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. iSVP: an integrated structural variant calling pipeline from high-throughput sequencing data.
Mimori T; Nariai N; Kojima K; Takahashi M; Ono A; Sato Y; Yamaguchi-Kabata Y; Nagasaki M
BMC Syst Biol; 2013; 7 Suppl 6(Suppl 6):S8. PubMed ID: 24564972
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. MAMnet: detecting and genotyping deletions and insertions based on long reads and a deep learning approach.
Ding H; Luo J
Brief Bioinform; 2022 Sep; 23(5):. PubMed ID: 35580841
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Detection of somatic structural variants from short-read next-generation sequencing data.
Gong T; Hayes VM; Chan EKF
Brief Bioinform; 2021 May; 22(3):. PubMed ID: 32379294
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. SVsearcher: A more accurate structural variation detection method in long read data.
Zheng Y; Shang X; Sung WK
Comput Biol Med; 2023 May; 158():106843. PubMed ID: 37019014
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Comparison of structural variant callers for massive whole-genome sequence data.
Joe S; Park JL; Kim J; Kim S; Park JH; Yeo MK; Lee D; Yang JO; Kim SY
BMC Genomics; 2024 Mar; 25(1):318. PubMed ID: 38549092
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Precise characterization of somatic complex structural variations from tumor/control paired long-read sequencing data with nanomonsv.
Shiraishi Y; Koya J; Chiba K; Okada A; Arai Y; Saito Y; Shibata T; Kataoka K
Nucleic Acids Res; 2023 Aug; 51(14):e74. PubMed ID: 37336583
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Use of RAPTR-SV to Identify SVs from Read Pairing and Split Read Signatures.
Bickhart DM
Methods Mol Biol; 2018; 1833():143-153. PubMed ID: 30039370
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Evaluating Structural Variation Detection Tools for Long-Read Sequencing Datasets in
Luan MW; Zhang XM; Zhu ZB; Chen Y; Xie SQ
Front Genet; 2020; 11():159. PubMed ID: 32211024
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Structural variation detection using next-generation sequencing data: A comparative technical review.
Guan P; Sung WK
Methods; 2016 Jun; 102():36-49. PubMed ID: 26845461
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Gustaf: Detecting and correctly classifying SVs in the NGS twilight zone.
Trappe K; Emde AK; Ehrlich HC; Reinert K
Bioinformatics; 2014 Dec; 30(24):3484-90. PubMed ID: 25028727
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. A recurrence-based approach for validating structural variation using long-read sequencing technology.
Zhao X; Weber AM; Mills RE
Gigascience; 2017 Aug; 6(8):1-9. PubMed ID: 28873962
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. SV-AUTOPILOT: optimized, automated construction of structural variation discovery and benchmarking pipelines.
Leung WY; Marschall T; Paudel Y; Falquet L; Mei H; Schönhuth A; Maoz Moss TY
BMC Genomics; 2015 Mar; 16(1):238. PubMed ID: 25887570
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. GASOLINE: detecting germline and somatic structural variants from long-reads data.
Magi A; Mattei G; Mingrino A; Caprioli C; Ronchini C; Frigè G; Semeraro R; Baragli M; Bolognini D; Colombo E; Mazzarella L; Pelicci PG
Sci Rep; 2023 Nov; 13(1):20817. PubMed ID: 38012350
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. The impact of FASTQ and alignment read order on structural variant calling from long-read sequencing data.
Lesack KJ; Wasmuth JD
PeerJ; 2024; 12():e17101. PubMed ID: 38500526
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
