211 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 31959575)
1. Outcomes comparison of hydrophilic and non-hydrophilic catheters for patients with intermittent catheterization: An updated meta-analysis.
Feng D; Cheng L; Bai Y; Yang Y; Han P
Asian J Surg; 2020 May; 43(5):633-635. PubMed ID: 31959575
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. Can hydrophilic coated catheters be beneficial for the public healthcare system in Brazil? - A cost-effectiveness analysis in patients with spinal cord injuries.
Truzzi JC; Teich V; Pepe C
Int Braz J Urol; 2018; 44(1):121-131. PubMed ID: 28792195
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Comparison of the use of conventional, hydrophilic and gel-lubricated catheters with regard to urethral micro trauma, urinary system infection, and patient satisfaction in patients with spinal cord injury: a randomized controlled study.
Sarica S; Akkoc Y; Karapolat H; Aktug H
Eur J Phys Rehabil Med; 2010 Dec; 46(4):473-9. PubMed ID: 20445490
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Intermittent Catheters for Chronic Urinary Retention: A Health Technology Assessment.
Health Quality Ontario
Ont Health Technol Assess Ser; 2019; 19(1):1-153. PubMed ID: 30847008
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Hydrophilic versus non-hydrophilic catheters for clean intermittent catheterization: a meta-analysis to determine their capacity in reducing urinary tract infections.
Plata M; Santander J; Zuluaga L; Torres-Sandoval C; Valencia S; Azuero J; Trujillo CG
World J Urol; 2023 Feb; 41(2):491-499. PubMed ID: 36547679
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Outcome comparison of different approaches to self-intermittent catheterization in neurogenic patients: a systematic review.
Shamout S; Biardeau X; Corcos J; Campeau L
Spinal Cord; 2017 Jul; 55(7):629-643. PubMed ID: 28117329
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Effects of hydrophilic coated catheters on urethral trauma, microtrauma and adverse events with intermittent catheterization in patients with bladder dysfunction: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
Liao X; Liu Y; Liang S; Li K
Int Urol Nephrol; 2022 Jul; 54(7):1461-1470. PubMed ID: 35449382
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Intermittent self catheterisation with hydrophilic, gel reservoir, and non-coated catheters: a systematic review and cost effectiveness analysis.
Bermingham SL; Hodgkinson S; Wright S; Hayter E; Spinks J; Pellowe C
BMJ; 2013 Jan; 346():e8639. PubMed ID: 23303886
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Intermittent catheterisation for long-term bladder management.
Prieto J; Murphy CL; Moore KN; Fader M
Cochrane Database Syst Rev; 2014 Sep; (9):CD006008. PubMed ID: 25208303
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. A scoping review on the impact of hydrophilic versus non-hydrophilic intermittent catheters on UTI, QoL, satisfaction, preference, and other outcomes in neurogenic and non-neurogenic patients suffering from urinary retention.
Barken KB; Vaabengaard R
BMC Urol; 2022 Sep; 22(1):153. PubMed ID: 36123663
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Intermittent catheterisation with hydrophilic and non-hydrophilic urinary catheters: systematic literature review and meta-analyses.
Rognoni C; Tarricone R
BMC Urol; 2017 Jan; 17(1):4. PubMed ID: 28073354
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Healthcare Costs Associated with Hydrophilic-Coated And Non-Coated Urinary Catheters for Intermittent Use In the United States.
Urol Nurs; 2016; 36(5):233-42. PubMed ID: 29240338
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Complications of Indwelling Urinary Catheter Care and Care Transitions: A Teachable Moment.
Kepes JA; Wilhite JB; Markland AD
JAMA Intern Med; 2016 Jun; 176(6):737-8. PubMed ID: 27088441
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. [Catheter-related suprapubic infections].
Sotto A
Rev Prat; 2014 May; 64(5):653. PubMed ID: 24923050
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. Commentary to "Intermittent catheterization with a hydrophilic-coated catheter delays the occurrence of urinary tract infection in patients with acute spinal cord injury: a prospective, randomized, parallel, multicenter trial".
Yang CC
PM R; 2011 May; 3(5):418. PubMed ID: 21570028
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. Cost-Effectiveness Analysis of Long-Term Intermittent Self-Catheterization with Hydrophilic-Coated and Uncoated Catheters in Patients with Spinal Cord Injury in Japan.
Watanabe T; Yamamoto S; Gotoh M; Saitoh T; Yokoyama O; Murata T; Takeda M
Low Urin Tract Symptoms; 2017 Sep; 9(3):142-150. PubMed ID: 28868661
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Long-term bladder drainage: Suprapubic catheter versus other methods: a scoping review.
Hunter KF; Bharmal A; Moore KN
Neurourol Urodyn; 2013 Sep; 32(7):944-51. PubMed ID: 23192860
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Randomized Crossover Trial of Single Use Hydrophilic Coated vs Multiple Use Polyvinylchloride Catheters for Intermittent Catheterization to Determine Incidence of Urinary Infection.
Kiddoo D; Sawatzky B; Bascu CD; Dharamsi N; Afshar K; Moore KN
J Urol; 2015 Jul; 194(1):174-9. PubMed ID: 25584995
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Types of urethral catheters for management of short-term voiding problems in hospitalized adults: a short version Cochrane review.
Schumm K; Lam TB
Neurourol Urodyn; 2008; 27(8):738-46. PubMed ID: 18951451
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Efficacy and safety of urinary catheters with silver alloy coating in patients with spinal cord injury: a multicentric pragmatic randomized controlled trial. The ESCALE trial.
Bonfill X; Rigau D; Esteban-Fuertes M; Barrera-Chacón JM; Jáuregui-Abrisqueta ML; Salvador S; Alemán-Sánchez CM; Borau A; Bea-Muñoz M; Hidalgo B; Andrade MJ; Espinosa JR; Martínez-Zapata MJ;
Spine J; 2017 Nov; 17(11):1650-1657. PubMed ID: 28578163
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
