1022 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 31960915)
1. A systematic review of the quality of clinical prediction models in in vitro fertilisation.
Ratna MB; Bhattacharya S; Abdulrahim B; McLernon DJ
Hum Reprod; 2020 Jan; 35(1):100-116. PubMed ID: 31960915
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. External validation of models for predicting cumulative live birth over multiple complete cycles of IVF treatment.
Ratna MB; Bhattacharya S; McLernon DJ
Hum Reprod; 2023 Oct; 38(10):1998-2010. PubMed ID: 37632223
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Predicting the cumulative chance of live birth over multiple complete cycles of in vitro fertilization: an external validation study.
Leijdekkers JA; Eijkemans MJC; van Tilborg TC; Oudshoorn SC; McLernon DJ; Bhattacharya S; Mol BWJ; Broekmans FJM; Torrance HL;
Hum Reprod; 2018 Sep; 33(9):1684-1695. PubMed ID: 30085143
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Predicting cumulative live birth for couples beginning their second complete cycle of in vitro fertilization treatment.
Ratna MB; Bhattacharya S; van Geloven N; McLernon DJ
Hum Reprod; 2022 Aug; 37(9):2075-2086. PubMed ID: 35866894
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Cumulative live birth rates following miscarriage in an initial complete cycle of IVF: a retrospective cohort study of 112 549 women.
Cameron NJ; Bhattacharya S; Bhattacharya S; McLernon DJ
Hum Reprod; 2017 Nov; 32(11):2287-2297. PubMed ID: 29040570
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Cumulative live birth rates after one or more complete cycles of IVF: a population-based study of linked cycle data from 178,898 women.
McLernon DJ; Maheshwari A; Lee AJ; Bhattacharya S
Hum Reprod; 2016 Mar; 31(3):572-81. PubMed ID: 26783243
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. The vaginal microbiome as a predictor for outcome of in vitro fertilization with or without intracytoplasmic sperm injection: a prospective study.
Koedooder R; Singer M; Schoenmakers S; Savelkoul PHM; Morré SA; de Jonge JD; Poort L; Cuypers WJSS; Beckers NGM; Broekmans FJM; Cohlen BJ; den Hartog JE; Fleischer K; Lambalk CB; Smeenk JMJS; Budding AE; Laven JSE
Hum Reprod; 2019 Jun; 34(6):1042-1054. PubMed ID: 31119299
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Cumulative live birth rates following blastocyst- versus cleavage-stage embryo transfer in the first complete cycle of IVF: a population-based retrospective cohort study.
Cameron NJ; Bhattacharya S; McLernon DJ
Hum Reprod; 2020 Oct; 35(10):2365-2374. PubMed ID: 32949234
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. ICSI does not improve reproductive outcomes in autologous ovarian response cycles with non-male factor subfertility.
Supramaniam PR; Granne I; Ohuma EO; Lim LN; McVeigh E; Venkatakrishnan R; Becker CM; Mittal M
Hum Reprod; 2020 Mar; 35(3):583-594. PubMed ID: 32161952
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Pretreatment prediction for IVF outcomes: generalized applicable model or centre-specific model?
Cai J; Jiang X; Liu L; Liu Z; Chen J; Chen K; Yang X; Ren J
Hum Reprod; 2024 Feb; 39(2):364-373. PubMed ID: 37995380
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. ICSI does not increase the cumulative live birth rate in non-male factor infertility.
Li Z; Wang AY; Bowman M; Hammarberg K; Farquhar C; Johnson L; Safi N; Sullivan EA
Hum Reprod; 2018 Jul; 33(7):1322-1330. PubMed ID: 29897449
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Assessing couples' preferences for fresh or frozen embryo transfer: a discrete choice experiment.
Abdulrahim B; Scotland G; Bhattacharya S; Maheshwari A
Hum Reprod; 2021 Oct; 36(11):2891-2903. PubMed ID: 34550368
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Prioritizing IVF treatment in the post-COVID 19 era: a predictive modelling study based on UK national data.
Bhattacharya S; Maheshwari A; Ratna MB; van Eekelen R; Mol BW; McLernon DJ
Hum Reprod; 2021 Feb; 36(3):666-675. PubMed ID: 33226080
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Treatment-independent live birth after in-vitro fertilisation: a retrospective cohort study of 2,133 women.
ElMokhallalati Y; van Eekelen R; Bhattacharya S; McLernon DJ
Hum Reprod; 2019 Aug; 34(8):1470-1478. PubMed ID: 31306480
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Cumulative live birth rates in low-prognosis women.
Leijdekkers JA; Eijkemans MJC; van Tilborg TC; Oudshoorn SC; van Golde RJT; Hoek A; Lambalk CB; de Bruin JP; Fleischer K; Mochtar MH; Kuchenbecker WKH; Laven JSE; Mol BWJ; Torrance HL; Broekmans FJM;
Hum Reprod; 2019 Jun; 34(6):1030-1041. PubMed ID: 31125412
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Predicting the chance of live birth for women undergoing IVF: a novel pretreatment counselling tool.
Dhillon RK; McLernon DJ; Smith PP; Fishel S; Dowell K; Deeks JJ; Bhattacharya S; Coomarasamy A
Hum Reprod; 2016 Jan; 31(1):84-92. PubMed ID: 26498177
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Low-to-moderate alcohol consumption and success in fertility treatment: a Danish cohort study.
Lyngsø J; Ramlau-Hansen CH; Bay B; Ingerslev HJ; Strandberg-Larsen K; Kesmodel US
Hum Reprod; 2019 Jul; 34(7):1334-1344. PubMed ID: 31241750
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Predicting the success of IVF: external validation of the van Loendersloot's model.
Sarais V; Reschini M; Busnelli A; Biancardi R; Paffoni A; Somigliana E
Hum Reprod; 2016 Jun; 31(6):1245-52. PubMed ID: 27076503
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Cumulative live birth rates for women returning to ART treatment for a second ART-conceived child.
Paul RC; Fitzgerald O; Lieberman D; Venetis C; Chambers GM
Hum Reprod; 2020 Jun; 35(6):1432-1440. PubMed ID: 32380547
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. No common denominator: a review of outcome measures in IVF RCTs.
Wilkinson J; Roberts SA; Showell M; Brison DR; Vail A
Hum Reprod; 2016 Dec; 31(12):2714-2722. PubMed ID: 27664214
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
