603 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 31961036)
1. Impact of the MLC leaf-tip model in a commercial TPS: Dose calculation limitations and IROC-H phantom failures.
Koger B; Price R; Wang D; Toomeh D; Geneser S; Ford E
J Appl Clin Med Phys; 2020 Feb; 21(2):82-88. PubMed ID: 31961036
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Sensitivity of IROC phantom performance to radiotherapy treatment planning system beam modeling parameters based on community-driven data.
Glenn MC; Peterson CB; Howell RM; Followill DS; Pollard-Larkin JM; Kry SF
Med Phys; 2020 Oct; 47(10):5250-5259. PubMed ID: 32677052
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Optimizing the MLC model parameters for IMRT in the RayStation treatment planning system.
Chen S; Yi BY; Yang X; Xu H; Prado KL; D'Souza WD
J Appl Clin Med Phys; 2015 Sep; 16(5):322–332. PubMed ID: 26699315
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Validation and IMRT/VMAT delivery quality of a preconfigured fast-rotating O-ring linac system.
De Roover R; Crijns W; Poels K; Michiels S; Nulens A; Vanstraelen B; Petillion S; De Brabandere M; Haustermans K; Depuydt T
Med Phys; 2019 Jan; 46(1):328-339. PubMed ID: 30417523
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Dosimetric effects of multileaf collimator leaf width on intensity-modulated radiotherapy for head and neck cancer.
Hong CS; Ju SG; Kim M; Kim JI; Kim JM; Suh TS; Han Y; Ahn YC; Choi DH; Nam H; Park HC
Med Phys; 2014 Feb; 41(2):021712. PubMed ID: 24506603
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Rounded leaf end modeling in Pinnacle VMAT treatment planning for fixed jaw linacs.
Young LA; Yang F; Cao N; Meyer J
J Appl Clin Med Phys; 2016 Nov; 17(6):149-162. PubMed ID: 27929490
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Treatment plan complexity does not predict IROC Houston anthropomorphic head and neck phantom performance.
Glenn MC; Hernandez V; Saez J; Followill DS; Howell RM; Pollard-Larkin JM; Zhou S; Kry SF
Phys Med Biol; 2018 Oct; 63(20):205015. PubMed ID: 30230475
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Analysis of direct clinical consequences of MLC positional errors in volumetric-modulated arc therapy using 3D dosimetry system.
Nithiyanantham K; Mani GK; Subramani V; Mueller L; Palaniappan KK; Kataria T
J Appl Clin Med Phys; 2015 Sep; 16(5):296–305. PubMed ID: 26699311
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Phantomless patient-specific TomoTherapy QA via delivery performance monitoring and a secondary Monte Carlo dose calculation.
Handsfield LL; Jones R; Wilson DD; Siebers JV; Read PW; Chen Q
Med Phys; 2014 Oct; 41(10):101703. PubMed ID: 25281942
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Predicted Inferior Outcomes for Lung SBRT With Treatment Planning Systems That Fail Independent Phantom-Based Audits.
Greer MD; Koger B; Glenn M; Kang J; Rengan R; Zeng J; Ford E
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 2023 Apr; 115(5):1301-1308. PubMed ID: 36535431
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Evaluation of MLC leaf positioning accuracy for static and dynamic IMRT treatments using DAVID in vivo dosimetric system.
Karagoz G; Zorlu F; Yeginer M; Yildiz D; Ozyigit G
J Appl Clin Med Phys; 2016 Mar; 17(2):14-23. PubMed ID: 27074451
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Biological consequences of MLC calibration errors in IMRT delivery and QA.
Moiseenko V; Lapointe V; James K; Yin L; Liu M; Pawlicki T
Med Phys; 2012 Apr; 39(4):1917-24. PubMed ID: 22482613
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. A method to reconstruct and apply 3D primary fluence for treatment delivery verification.
Liu S; Mazur TR; Li H; Curcuru A; Green OL; Sun B; Mutic S; Yang D
J Appl Clin Med Phys; 2017 Jan; 18(1):128-138. PubMed ID: 28291913
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Feasibility of a GATE Monte Carlo platform in a clinical pretreatment QA system for VMAT treatment plans using TrueBeam with an HD120 multileaf collimator.
Lee B; Jeong S; Chung K; Yoon M; Park HC; Han Y; Jung SH
J Appl Clin Med Phys; 2019 Oct; 20(10):101-110. PubMed ID: 31544350
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Impact of grid size on uniform scanning and IMPT plans in XiO treatment planning system for brain cancer.
Rana S; Zheng Y
J Appl Clin Med Phys; 2015 Sep; 16(5):447–456. PubMed ID: 26699310
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Challenges in modeling the Agility multileaf collimator in treatment planning systems and current needs for improvement.
Hernandez V; Angerud A; Bogaert E; Hussein M; Lemire M; García-Miguel J; Saez J
Med Phys; 2022 Dec; 49(12):7404-7416. PubMed ID: 36217283
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Incorrect dosimetric leaf separation in IMRT and VMAT treatment planning: Clinical impact and correlation with pretreatment quality assurance.
Sjölin M; Edmund JM
Phys Med; 2016 Jul; 32(7):918-25. PubMed ID: 27394690
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Institutional patient-specific IMRT QA does not predict unacceptable plan delivery.
Kry SF; Molineu A; Kerns JR; Faught AM; Huang JY; Pulliam KB; Tonigan J; Alvarez P; Stingo F; Followill DS
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 2014 Dec; 90(5):1195-201. PubMed ID: 25442044
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Multi-institutional investigation into the robustness of intra-cranial multi-target stereotactic radiosurgery plans to delivery errors.
May L; Hardcastle N; Hernandez V; Saez J; Rosenfeld A; Poder J
Med Phys; 2024 Feb; 51(2):910-921. PubMed ID: 38141043
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Incorporating geometric ray tracing to generate initial conditions for intensity modulated arc therapy optimization.
Oliver M; Gladwish A; Craig J; Chen J; Wong E
Med Phys; 2008 Jul; 35(7):3137-50. PubMed ID: 18697539
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
