667 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 31961265)
1. Performance evaluation of ozone and particulate matter sensors.
DeWitt HL; Crow WL; Flowers B
J Air Waste Manag Assoc; 2020 Mar; 70(3):292-306. PubMed ID: 31961265
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Long-term field evaluation of the Plantower PMS low-cost particulate matter sensors.
Sayahi T; Butterfield A; Kelly KE
Environ Pollut; 2019 Feb; 245():932-940. PubMed ID: 30682749
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Analysis of short-term ozone and PM
Mannshardt E; Benedict K; Jenkins S; Keating M; Mintz D; Stone S; Wayland R
J Air Waste Manag Assoc; 2017 Apr; 67(4):462-474. PubMed ID: 27808658
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Development and field validation of a community-engaged particulate matter air quality monitoring network in Imperial, California, USA.
Carvlin GN; Lugo H; Olmedo L; Bejarano E; Wilkie A; Meltzer D; Wong M; King G; Northcross A; Jerrett M; English PB; Hammond D; Seto E
J Air Waste Manag Assoc; 2017 Dec; 67(12):1342-1352. PubMed ID: 28829718
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Ambient and laboratory evaluation of a low-cost particulate matter sensor.
Kelly KE; Whitaker J; Petty A; Widmer C; Dybwad A; Sleeth D; Martin R; Butterfield A
Environ Pollut; 2017 Feb; 221():491-500. PubMed ID: 28012666
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Two step calibration method for ozone low-cost sensor: Field experiences with the UrbanSense DCUs.
Sá JP; Chojer H; Branco PTBS; Alvim-Ferraz MCM; Martins FG; Sousa SIV
J Environ Manage; 2023 Feb; 328():116910. PubMed ID: 36495826
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Summary of PM
Long RW; Urbanski SP; Lincoln E; Colón M; Kaushik S; Krug JD; Vanderpool RW; Landis MS
J Air Waste Manag Assoc; 2023 Apr; 73(4):295-312. PubMed ID: 36716322
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Evaluating the Performance of Low-Cost Air Quality Monitors in Dallas, Texas.
Khreis H; Johnson J; Jack K; Dadashova B; Park ES
Int J Environ Res Public Health; 2022 Jan; 19(3):. PubMed ID: 35162669
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. The impact of the congestion charging scheme on air quality in London. Part 1. Emissions modeling and analysis of air pollution measurements.
Kelly F; Anderson HR; Armstrong B; Atkinson R; Barratt B; Beevers S; Derwent D; Green D; Mudway I; Wilkinson P;
Res Rep Health Eff Inst; 2011 Apr; (155):5-71. PubMed ID: 21830496
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. The London low emission zone baseline study.
Kelly F; Armstrong B; Atkinson R; Anderson HR; Barratt B; Beevers S; Cook D; Green D; Derwent D; Mudway I; Wilkinson P;
Res Rep Health Eff Inst; 2011 Nov; (163):3-79. PubMed ID: 22315924
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Particulate matter, nitrogen oxides, ozone, and select volatile organic compounds during a winter sampling period in Logan, Utah, USA.
Mukerjee S; Smith L; Long R; Lonneman W; Kaushik S; Colon M; Oliver K; Whitaker D
J Air Waste Manag Assoc; 2019 Jun; 69(6):778-788. PubMed ID: 30897029
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Improving accuracy of air pollution exposure measurements: Statistical correction of a municipal low-cost airborne particulate matter sensor network.
Considine EM; Reid CE; Ogletree MR; Dye T
Environ Pollut; 2021 Jan; 268(Pt B):115833. PubMed ID: 33120139
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Multicity study of air pollution and mortality in Latin America (the ESCALA study).
Romieu I; Gouveia N; Cifuentes LA; de Leon AP; Junger W; Vera J; Strappa V; Hurtado-Díaz M; Miranda-Soberanis V; Rojas-Bracho L; Carbajal-Arroyo L; Tzintzun-Cervantes G;
Res Rep Health Eff Inst; 2012 Oct; (171):5-86. PubMed ID: 23311234
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Process analysis of a regional air pollution episode over Pearl River Delta region, China, using the MM5-CMAQ model.
Fan Q; Yu W; Fan S; Wang X; Lan J; Zou D; Feng Y; Chan PW
J Air Waste Manag Assoc; 2014 Apr; 64(4):406-18. PubMed ID: 24843912
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Assessing the accuracy of commercially available gas sensors for the measurement of ambient ozone and nitrogen dioxide.
Isiugo K; Newman N; Jandarov R; Grinshpun SA; Reponen T
J Occup Environ Hyg; 2018 Nov; 15(11):782-791. PubMed ID: 30156975
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Development of Air Quality Boxes Based on Low-Cost Sensor Technology for Ambient Air Quality Monitoring.
Gäbel P; Koller C; Hertig E
Sensors (Basel); 2022 May; 22(10):. PubMed ID: 35632239
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Feasibility of using low-cost portable particle monitors for measurement of fine and coarse particulate matter in urban ambient air.
Han I; Symanski E; Stock TH
J Air Waste Manag Assoc; 2017 Mar; 67(3):330-340. PubMed ID: 27690287
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Long-term evaluation of air sensor technology under ambient conditions in Denver, Colorado.
Feinberg S; Williams R; Hagler GSW; Rickard J; Brown R; Garver D; Harshfield G; Stauffer P; Mattson E; Judge R; Garvey S
Atmos Meas Tech; 2018; 11(8):4605-4615. PubMed ID: 31595175
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. [Characteristics of Ozone Pollution, Meteorological Impact, and Evaluation of Forecasting Results Based on a Neural Network Model in Beijing-Tianjin-Hebei Region].
Zhu YY; Liu B; Gui HL; Li JJ; Wang W
Huan Jing Ke Xue; 2022 Aug; 43(8):3966-3976. PubMed ID: 35971695
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Long-term meteorologically independent trend analysis of ozone air quality at an urban site in the greater Houston area.
Botlaguduru VSV; Kommalapati RR; Huque Z
J Air Waste Manag Assoc; 2018 Oct; 68(10):1051-1064. PubMed ID: 29672238
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
