These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

246 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 31961329)

  • 21. Direct-to-consumer genetic tests providing health risk information: A systematic review of consequences for consumers and health services.
    Nolan JJ; Ormondroyd E
    Clin Genet; 2023 Jul; 104(1):3-21. PubMed ID: 36994636
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Genetic counseling following direct-to consumer genetic testing: Consumer perspectives.
    Marzulla T; Roberts JS; DeVries R; Koeller DR; Green RC; Uhlmann WR
    J Genet Couns; 2021 Feb; 30(1):329-334. PubMed ID: 32648332
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Assessment of Direct-to-Consumer Genetic Testing Policy in Korea Based on Consumer Preference.
    Jeong G
    Public Health Genomics; 2017; 20(3):166-173. PubMed ID: 28817817
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Public Attitudes Toward Direct to Consumer Genetic Testing.
    Ruhl GL; Hazel JW; Clayton EW; Malin BA
    AMIA Annu Symp Proc; 2019; 2019():774-783. PubMed ID: 32308873
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. How to Approach Direct-to-Consumer Genetic Testing With Your Patients.
    Renkes EM; Flanagan J; Deberg K; Bell M
    S D Med; 2022 Nov; 75(11):518-520. PubMed ID: 36893031
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Consumer Perceptions of Interactions With Primary Care Providers After Direct-to-Consumer Personal Genomic Testing.
    van der Wouden CH; Carere DA; Maitland-van der Zee AH; Ruffin MT; Roberts JS; Green RC;
    Ann Intern Med; 2016 Apr; 164(8):513-22. PubMed ID: 26928821
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. RECONCEPTUALIZING CONSENT FOR DIRECT-TO-CONSUMER HEALTH SERVICES.
    Spector-Bagdady K
    Am J Law Med; 2015; 41(4):568-616. PubMed ID: 26863850
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Direct-to-consumer DNA testing and the GP.
    Trent R
    Aust Fam Physician; 2014 Jul; 43(7):436-9. PubMed ID: 25006602
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. [Direct-to-consumer genetic tests in the consulting room].
    Gerrits EM; van Dooren MF; Bredenoord AL; van Mil MHW
    Ned Tijdschr Geneeskd; 2019 Nov; 163():. PubMed ID: 32073784
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Benefits and Risks of Direct-to-Consumer Testing.
    Ayala-Lopez N; Nichols JH
    Arch Pathol Lab Med; 2020 Oct; 144(10):1193-1198. PubMed ID: 33002154
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. [Direct-to-consumer genetic testing: a regulation by the market, or a medical regulation?].
    Jautrou H
    Med Sci (Paris); 2020 Feb; 36(2):153-159. PubMed ID: 32129752
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Direct-to-Consumer Genetic Testing on Social Media: Topic Modeling and Sentiment Analysis of YouTube Users' Comments.
    Toussaint PA; Renner M; Lins S; Thiebes S; Sunyaev A
    JMIR Infodemiology; 2022; 2(2):e38749. PubMed ID: 37113449
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Health and kinship matter: Learning about direct-to-consumer genetic testing user experiences via online discussions.
    Yin Z; Song L; Clayton EW; Malin BA
    PLoS One; 2020; 15(9):e0238644. PubMed ID: 32898148
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Direct-to-consumer genetic testing: an updated systematic review of healthcare professionals' knowledge and views, and ethical and legal concerns.
    Martins MF; Murry LT; Telford L; Moriarty F
    Eur J Hum Genet; 2022 Dec; 30(12):1331-1343. PubMed ID: 36220915
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Direct-to-Consumer Genetic Testing: Value and Risk.
    Majumder MA; Guerrini CJ; McGuire AL
    Annu Rev Med; 2021 Jan; 72():151-166. PubMed ID: 32735764
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Current landscape of direct-to-consumer genetic testing and its role in ophthalmology: a review.
    Sanfilippo PG; Kearns LS; Wright P; Mackey DA; Hewitt AW
    Clin Exp Ophthalmol; 2015 Aug; 43(6):578-90. PubMed ID: 25676199
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Factors Associated with Acceptability, Consideration and Intention of Uptake of Direct-To-Consumer Genetic Testing: A Survey Study.
    Stewart KFJ; Kokole D; Wesselius A; Schols AMWJ; Zeegers MP; de Vries H; van Osch LADM
    Public Health Genomics; 2018; 21(1-2):45-52. PubMed ID: 30359983
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Direct-to-Consumer Tests on the Market Today: Identifying Valuable Tests from Those with Limited Utility.
    Isbell TS
    Clin Lab Med; 2020 Mar; 40(1):13-23. PubMed ID: 32008636
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Informing the Design of Direct-to-Consumer Interactive Personal Genomics Reports.
    Shaer O; Nov O; Okerlund J; Balestra M; Stowell E; Ascher L; Bi J; Schlenker C; Ball M
    J Med Internet Res; 2015 Jun; 17(6):e146. PubMed ID: 26070951
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Direct-to-Consumer Genetic Testing: A Comprehensive Review.
    Jiang S; Liberti L; Lebo D
    Ther Innov Regul Sci; 2023 Nov; 57(6):1190-1198. PubMed ID: 37589855
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 13.