BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

253 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 31964585)

  • 1. Clinical, pathological, and oncologic outcomes of robotic-assisted versus laparoscopic proctectomy for rectal cancer: A meta-analysis of randomized controlled studies.
    Han C; Yan P; Jing W; Li M; Du B; Si M; Yang J; Yang K; Cai H; Guo T
    Asian J Surg; 2020 Sep; 43(9):880-890. PubMed ID: 31964585
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. [Efficacy comparison between robot-assisted and laparoscopic surgery for mid-low rectal cancer: a prospective randomized controlled trial].
    Tang B; Gao GM; Zou Z; Liu DN; Tang C; Jiang QG; Lei X; Li TY
    Zhonghua Wei Chang Wai Ke Za Zhi; 2020 Apr; 23(4):377-383. PubMed ID: 32306606
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Robotic versus laparoscopic proctectomy for rectal cancer: a meta-analysis.
    Memon S; Heriot AG; Murphy DG; Bressel M; Lynch AC
    Ann Surg Oncol; 2012 Jul; 19(7):2095-101. PubMed ID: 22350601
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Functional outcomes after laparoscopic versus robotic-assisted rectal resection: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
    Kowalewski KF; Seifert L; Ali S; Schmidt MW; Seide S; Haney C; Tapking C; Shamiyeh A; Kulu Y; Hackert T; Müller-Stich BP; Nickel F
    Surg Endosc; 2021 Jan; 35(1):81-95. PubMed ID: 32025924
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Laparoscopic vs. open mesorectal excision for rectal cancer: Are these approaches still comparable? A systematic review and meta-analysis.
    Conticchio M; Papagni V; Notarnicola M; Delvecchio A; Riccelli U; Ammendola M; Currò G; Pessaux P; Silvestris N; Memeo R
    PLoS One; 2020; 15(7):e0235887. PubMed ID: 32722694
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Effects of laparoscopic vs robotic-assisted mesorectal excision for rectal cancer: An update systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.
    Huang YJ; Kang YN; Huang YM; Wu AT; Wang W; Wei PL
    Asian J Surg; 2019 Jun; 42(6):657-666. PubMed ID: 30609955
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Robotic Versus Laparoscopic Rectal Surgery for Rectal Cancer: A Meta-Analysis of 7 Randomized Controlled Trials.
    Li L; Zhang W; Guo Y; Wang X; Yu H; Du B; Yang X; Luo Y
    Surg Innov; 2019 Aug; 26(4):497-504. PubMed ID: 31081483
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Robotic versus laparoscopic intersphincteric resection for low rectal cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
    Lee SH; Kim DH; Lim SW
    Int J Colorectal Dis; 2018 Dec; 33(12):1741-1753. PubMed ID: 30187156
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. [Short-term efficacy of robotic-assisted total mesorectal excision with and without lateral lymph node dissection for mid-low advanced rectal cancer: a propensity score matching analysis].
    Shi FY; Zhang L; Qin Q; Jin X; Hu CH; Yu TY; Ma L; Wang GH; Wu H; Xia P; Sun XJ; She JJ
    Zhonghua Wei Chang Wai Ke Za Zhi; 2020 Apr; 23(4):370-376. PubMed ID: 32306605
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Long-term oncological outcomes in robotic versus laparoscopic approach for rectal cancer: A systematic review and meta-analysis.
    Qiu H; Yu D; Ye S; Shan R; Ai J; Shi J
    Int J Surg; 2020 Aug; 80():225-230. PubMed ID: 32251720
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. The volume-outcome relationship in robotic protectectomy: does center volume matter? Results of a national cohort study.
    Concors SJ; Murken DR; Hernandez PT; Mahmoud NN; Paulson EC
    Surg Endosc; 2020 Oct; 34(10):4472-4480. PubMed ID: 31637603
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Open Versus Laparoscopic Versus Robotic Versus Transanal Mesorectal Excision for Rectal Cancer: A Systematic Review and Network Meta-analysis.
    Simillis C; Lal N; Thoukididou SN; Kontovounisios C; Smith JJ; Hompes R; Adamina M; Tekkis PP
    Ann Surg; 2019 Jul; 270(1):59-68. PubMed ID: 30720507
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Surgical approach for rectal cancer: A network meta-analysis comparing open, laparoscopic, robotic and transanal TME approaches.
    Ryan OK; Ryan ÉJ; Creavin B; Rausa E; Kelly ME; Petrelli F; Bonitta G; Kennelly R; Hanly A; Martin ST; Winter DC
    Eur J Surg Oncol; 2021 Feb; 47(2):285-295. PubMed ID: 33280950
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Robotic Versus Laparoscopic Minimally Invasive Surgery for Rectal Cancer: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials.
    Prete FP; Pezzolla A; Prete F; Testini M; Marzaioli R; Patriti A; Jimenez-Rodriguez RM; Gurrado A; Strippoli GFM
    Ann Surg; 2018 Jun; 267(6):1034-1046. PubMed ID: 28984644
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Comparison of pathological outcomes between robotic rectal cancer surgery and laparoscopic rectal cancer surgery: A meta-analysis based on seven randomized controlled trials.
    Liao G; Zhao Z; Deng H; Li X
    Int J Med Robot; 2019 Oct; 15(5):e2027. PubMed ID: 31329357
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Robot-assisted versus laparoscopic surgery for rectal cancer: A systematic review and meta-analysis.
    Wang X; Cao G; Mao W; Lao W; He C
    J Cancer Res Ther; 2020 Sep; 16(5):979-989. PubMed ID: 33004738
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Quality of total mesorectal excision and depth of circumferential resection margin in rectal cancer: a matched comparison of the first 20 robotic cases.
    Barnajian M; Pettet D; Kazi E; Foppa C; Bergamaschi R
    Colorectal Dis; 2014 Aug; 16(8):603-9. PubMed ID: 24750995
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Laparoscopic vs. robotic rectal cancer surgery and the effect on conversion rates: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials and propensity-score-matched studies.
    Phan K; Kahlaee HR; Kim SH; Toh JWT
    Tech Coloproctol; 2019 Mar; 23(3):221-230. PubMed ID: 30623315
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Robotic-assisted vs. conventional laparoscopic surgery for rectal cancer: short-term outcomes at a single center.
    Yamaguchi T; Kinugasa Y; Shiomi A; Tomioka H; Kagawa H; Yamakawa Y
    Surg Today; 2016 Aug; 46(8):957-62. PubMed ID: 26482845
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Defining the Role of Minimally Invasive Proctectomy for Locally Advanced Rectal Adenocarcinoma.
    Sujatha-Bhaskar S; Jafari MD; Gahagan JV; Inaba CS; Koh CY; Mills SD; Carmichael JC; Stamos MJ; Pigazzi A
    Ann Surg; 2017 Oct; 266(4):574-581. PubMed ID: 28650357
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 13.