BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

182 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 31964849)

  • 1. Universals and variations in moral decisions made in 42 countries by 70,000 participants.
    Awad E; Dsouza S; Shariff A; Rahwan I; Bonnefon JF
    Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A; 2020 Feb; 117(5):2332-2337. PubMed ID: 31964849
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Sidetracked by trolleys: Why sacrificial moral dilemmas tell us little (or nothing) about utilitarian judgment.
    Kahane G
    Soc Neurosci; 2015; 10(5):551-60. PubMed ID: 25791902
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Contemplating the ultimate sacrifice: identity fusion channels pro-group affect, cognition, and moral decision making.
    Swann WB; Gómez A; Buhrmester MD; López-Rodríguez L; Jiménez J; Vázquez A
    J Pers Soc Psychol; 2014 May; 106(5):713-27. PubMed ID: 24749820
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Of Mice, Men, and Trolleys: Hypothetical Judgment Versus Real-Life Behavior in Trolley-Style Moral Dilemmas.
    Bostyn DH; Sevenhant S; Roets A
    Psychol Sci; 2018 Jul; 29(7):1084-1093. PubMed ID: 29741993
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Distributed Cognition and Distributed Morality: Agency, Artifacts and Systems.
    Heersmink R
    Sci Eng Ethics; 2017 Apr; 23(2):431-448. PubMed ID: 27380187
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Moral in whose eyes? Cross-cultural differences in moral decision making and behaviour.
    Seo M; Na J; Kim YH
    Int J Psychol; 2021 Feb; 56(1):175-182. PubMed ID: 32378182
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Sacrificial utilitarian judgments do reflect concern for the greater good: Clarification via process dissociation and the judgments of philosophers.
    Conway P; Goldstein-Greenwood J; Polacek D; Greene JD
    Cognition; 2018 Oct; 179():241-265. PubMed ID: 30064654
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. The role of moral utility in decision making: an interdisciplinary framework.
    Tobler PN; Kalis A; Kalenscher T
    Cogn Affect Behav Neurosci; 2008 Dec; 8(4):390-401. PubMed ID: 19033237
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. A conceptual and computational model of moral decision making in human and artificial agents.
    Wallach W; Franklin S; Allen C
    Top Cogn Sci; 2010 Jul; 2(3):454-85. PubMed ID: 25163872
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Probability, measurement mismatches, and sacrificial moral decision-making.
    Palanca FR; Burns BD
    Cognition; 2024 Feb; 243():105692. PubMed ID: 38101081
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Deontological and utilitarian inclinations in moral decision making: a process dissociation approach.
    Conway P; Gawronski B
    J Pers Soc Psychol; 2013 Feb; 104(2):216-35. PubMed ID: 23276267
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Ethical decision-making about older adults and moral intensity: an international study of physicians.
    Malloy DC; Williams J; Hadjistavropoulos T; Krishnan B; Jeyaraj M; McCarthy EF; Murakami M; Paholpak S; Mafukidze J; Hillis B
    J Med Ethics; 2008 Apr; 34(4):285-96. PubMed ID: 18375683
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Hippocampal Damage Increases Deontological Responses during Moral Decision Making.
    McCormick C; Rosenthal CR; Miller TD; Maguire EA
    J Neurosci; 2016 Nov; 36(48):12157-12167. PubMed ID: 27903725
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Exogenous testosterone increases sensitivity to moral norms in moral dilemma judgements.
    Brannon SM; Carr S; Jin ES; Josephs RA; Gawronski B
    Nat Hum Behav; 2019 Aug; 3(8):856-866. PubMed ID: 31332298
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Trolley Dilemma in Papua. Yali horticulturalists refuse to pull the lever.
    Sorokowski P; Marczak M; Misiak M; Białek M
    Psychon Bull Rev; 2020 Apr; 27(2):398-403. PubMed ID: 31907849
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Consequences, norms, and generalized inaction in moral dilemmas: The CNI model of moral decision-making.
    Gawronski B; Armstrong J; Conway P; Friesdorf R; Hütter M
    J Pers Soc Psychol; 2017 Sep; 113(3):343-376. PubMed ID: 28816493
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Human decision-making biases in the moral dilemmas of autonomous vehicles.
    Frank DA; Chrysochou P; Mitkidis P; Ariely D
    Sci Rep; 2019 Sep; 9(1):13080. PubMed ID: 31511560
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Neurocomputational mechanisms at play when weighing concerns for extrinsic rewards, moral values, and social image.
    Qu C; Météreau E; Butera L; Villeval MC; Dreher JC
    PLoS Biol; 2019 Jun; 17(6):e3000283. PubMed ID: 31170138
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Socio-cognitive conflict, emotions and complexity of thought in real-life morality.
    Myyry L; Helkama K
    Scand J Psychol; 2007 Jun; 48(3):247-59. PubMed ID: 17518917
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Effects of Suboptimally Presented Erotic Pictures on Moral Judgments: A Cross-Cultural Comparison.
    Olivera-La Rosa A; Corradi G; Villacampa J; Martí-Vilar M; Arango OE; Rosselló J
    PLoS One; 2016; 11(7):e0158690. PubMed ID: 27367795
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.