These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
24. [Comparative study of mechanical heart valves for implantation in mitral position]. Heiliger R; Lambertz H; Geks J; Mittermayer C Herz; 1987 Dec; 12(6):405-12. PubMed ID: 3428845 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. In vitro pulsatile flow hemodynamics of five mechanical aortic heart valve prostheses. Walker PG; Yoganathan AP Eur J Cardiothorac Surg; 1992; 6 Suppl 1():S113-23. PubMed ID: 1389270 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Flow visualization of a monoleaflet and bileaflet mechanical heart valve in a pneumatic ventricular assist device using a PIV system. Lee H; Tatsumi E; Taenaka Y ASAIO J; 2010; 56(3):186-93. PubMed ID: 20449894 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Experimental study on the Reynolds and viscous shear stress of bileaflet mechanical heart valves in a pneumatic ventricular assist device. Lee H; Tatsumi E; Taenaka Y ASAIO J; 2009; 55(4):348-54. PubMed ID: 19521236 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Assessment of a new silicone tri-leaflet valve seamlessly assembled with blood chamber for a low-cost ventricular assist device. Hirai S; Fukunaga S; Sueshiro M; Watari M; Sueda T; Matsuura Y Hiroshima J Med Sci; 1998 Jun; 47(2):47-55. PubMed ID: 9674340 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Estimation of Reynolds stresses within the Penn State left ventricular assist device. Baldwin JT; Deutsch S; Geselowitz DB; Tarbell JM ASAIO Trans; 1990; 36(3):M274-8. PubMed ID: 2252676 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. The improved Jellyfish Valve: durability enhancement with sufficient blood compatibility. Iwasaki K; Umezu M; Abe Y; Chinzei T; Isoyama T; Saito I; Ishimaru M; Imachi K ASAIO J; 2002; 48(5):532-7. PubMed ID: 12296575 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. In vitro pulsatile flow velocity and turbulent shear stress measurements in the vicinity of mechanical aortic heart valve prostheses. Woo YR; Yoganathan AP Life Support Syst; 1985; 3(4):283-312. PubMed ID: 4068753 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. [Experimental study of the hydrodynamics of polyurethane tricuspid heart valves]. Sister VG; Iurechko VN Med Tekh; 2006; (6):8-14. PubMed ID: 17290919 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. [Late complications following Björk-Shiley and St. Jude Medical heart valve replacement]. Horstkotte D; Körfer R; Budde T; Haerten K; Schulte HD; Bircks W; Loogen F Z Kardiol; 1983 May; 72(5):251-61. PubMed ID: 6880335 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Comparative evaluation of disk- and trileaflet valves in left-ventricular assist devices (LVAD). Reul H; Taguchi K; Herold M; Lo HB; Reck B; Mückter H; Messmer BJ; Rau G Int J Artif Organs; 1988 Mar; 11(2):127-30. PubMed ID: 3372050 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. The porous metal-surfaced heart valve. Long-term study without long-term anticoagulation in mitral position in goats. Björk VO; Wilson GJ; Sternlieb JJ; Kaminsky DB J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg; 1988 Jun; 95(6):1067-82. PubMed ID: 3374158 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Twelve-year comparison of a Bjork-Shiley mechanical heart valve with porcine bioprostheses. Bloomfield P; Wheatley DJ; Prescott RJ; Miller HC N Engl J Med; 1991 Feb; 324(9):573-9. PubMed ID: 1992318 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. [Long-term follow-up of aortic or mitral valve replacement. Comparison of results following implantation of a mechanical or biological artificial valve]. Mudra H; Rudolph W Herz; 1986 Apr; 11(2):97-115. PubMed ID: 3699678 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Previous] [Next] [New Search]