These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
127 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 319665)
1. Utilization review for Medicare. Is this a good use of nurses' time? Snider ME Am J Nurs; 1977 Jan; 77(1):107-9. PubMed ID: 319665 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. Peer review now: PSRO at work. Mod Healthc (Short Term Care); 1975 Jan; 3(1):49-55. PubMed ID: 233999 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
4. A nursing role in medical peer review. Borowski R; Jacobsen DP; Nikolai TF; Lohrenz FN Hosp Prog; 1975 Dec; 56(12):65-6. PubMed ID: 1104467 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. PSRO impact on utilization: forecast in a cloudy crystal ball. Berry NJ Hospitals; 1977 Feb; 51(4):57-60. PubMed ID: 319049 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. Relation between quality assessment and utilization review in a functioning PSRO. Nelson AR N Engl J Med; 1975 Mar; 292(13):671-5. PubMed ID: 1089879 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. An R.N. makes the medical peer-review team. Kellogg N RN; 1976 Apr; 39(4):73-4, 76, 78 passim. PubMed ID: 1045442 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
9. The PSRO hospital review system. Goran MJ; Roberts JS; Kellogg MA; Fielding J; Jessee W Med Care; 1975 Apr; 13(4 Suppl):1-33. PubMed ID: 1168294 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Quality assurance in the provision of hospital care. Case study. Teamwork forges medical care evaluation system. Chapin RB; Wheeler WS; Guevara O Hospitals; 1974 Mar; 48(5):75-9. PubMed ID: 4856108 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. QAP: the AHA's program. Brown MB; Sale WB Hospitals; 1974 Mar; 48(5):59-62 passim. PubMed ID: 4856107 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. A retrospective and concurrent medical audit. Knowlton HC Hosp Prog; 1975 Jun; 56(6):68, 73, 76 passim. PubMed ID: 1168621 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. Utilization review altered to advantage. Brown DE; Levy JD Hospitals; 1980 Mar; 54(5):83-6. PubMed ID: 7188763 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. PROs make us waste time and money. Gambrell TR Med Econ; 1992 Jun; 69(12):29, 32-3, 36-7. PubMed ID: 10118826 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. Quality assurance in the provision of hospital care. Case study. Review must be comprehensive. Maniaci M Hospitals; 1974 Mar; 48(5):81-3. PubMed ID: 4593007 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. The OPEL study intent and content. Dobson A; Davis F QRB Qual Rev Bull; 1978 Oct; 4(10):19-23. PubMed ID: 104222 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. The PRO utilization and quality review process: an overview--Part I. Politser P Bull Am Coll Surg; 1989 May; 74(5):17-22. PubMed ID: 10303472 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. PROs and poor quality medical care--they can't sanction it until they define it! Chenen AR Med Staff Couns; 1988; 2(2):25-33. PubMed ID: 10302314 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]