164 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 31968306)
21. Design and evaluation of the OmniSuit: A passive occupational exoskeleton for back and shoulder support.
van Sluijs R; Scholtysik T; Brunner A; Kuoni L; Bee D; Kos M; Bartenbach V; Lambercy O
Appl Ergon; 2024 Jun; 120():104332. PubMed ID: 38876001
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Evaluation of a machine-learning-driven active-passive upper-limb exoskeleton robot: Experimental human-in-the-loop study.
Nasr A; Hunter J; Dickerson CR; McPhee J
Wearable Technol; 2023; 4():e13. PubMed ID: 38487766
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Shoulder muscle activity and perceived comfort of industry workers using a commercial upper limb exoskeleton for simulated tasks.
Pinho JP; Forner-Cordero A
Appl Ergon; 2022 May; 101():103718. PubMed ID: 35202960
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Development and Experimental Validation of a Passive Exoskeletal Vest.
Du Z; Yan Z; Huang T; Bai O; Huang Q; Zhang T; Han B
IEEE Trans Neural Syst Rehabil Eng; 2022 Jul; PP():. PubMed ID: 35816530
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Passive Shoulder Exoskeletons: More Effective in the Lab Than in the Field?
De Bock S; Ghillebert J; Govaerts R; Elprama SA; Marusic U; Serrien B; Jacobs A; Geeroms J; Meeusen R; De Pauw K
IEEE Trans Neural Syst Rehabil Eng; 2021; 29():173-183. PubMed ID: 33264094
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Evaluation of a spring-loaded upper-limb exoskeleton in cleaning activities.
Pacifico I; Aprigliano F; Parri A; Cannillo G; Melandri I; Sabatini AM; Violante FS; Molteni F; Giovacchini F; Vitiello N; Crea S
Appl Ergon; 2023 Jan; 106():103877. PubMed ID: 36095895
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. The effects of exoskeleton use on human response to simulated overhead tasks with vibration.
Xia T; Torkinejad-Ziarati P; Kudernatsch S; Peterson DR
Ergonomics; 2024 Jul; ():1-14. PubMed ID: 38963600
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Effects of Upper-Limb Exoskeletons Designed for Use in the Working Environment-A Literature Review.
Moeller T; Krell-Roesch J; Woll A; Stein T
Front Robot AI; 2022; 9():858893. PubMed ID: 35572378
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
29. Efficacy of passive upper-limb exoskeletons in reducing musculoskeletal load associated with overhead tasks.
Kong YK; Kim JH; Shim HH; Shim JW; Park SS; Choi KH
Appl Ergon; 2023 May; 109():103965. PubMed ID: 36645995
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Influence of different passive shoulder exoskeletons on shoulder and torso muscle activation during simulated horizontal and vertical aircraft squeeze riveting tasks.
Jorgensen MJ; Hakansson NA; Desai J
Appl Ergon; 2022 Oct; 104():103822. PubMed ID: 35689869
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Model-Based Biomechanical Exoskeleton Concept Optimization for a Representative Lifting Task in Logistics.
Schiebl J; Tröster M; Idoudi W; Gneiting E; Spies L; Maufroy C; Schneider U; Bauernhansl T
Int J Environ Res Public Health; 2022 Nov; 19(23):. PubMed ID: 36497613
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Evaluation of a passive arm-support exoskeleton for surgical team members: Results from live surgeries.
Cha JS; Athanasiadis DI; Asadi H; Stefanidis D; Nussbaum MA; Yu D
J Safety Res; 2024 Jun; 89():322-330. PubMed ID: 38858056
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Experimental Study of Fully Passive, Fully Active, and Active-Passive Upper-Limb Exoskeleton Efficiency: An Assessment of Lifting Tasks.
Nasr A; Dickerson CR; McPhee J
Sensors (Basel); 2023 Dec; 24(1):. PubMed ID: 38202925
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Manufacturing Industry Stakeholder Perspectives on Occupational Exoskeletons: Changes after a Brief Exposure to Exoskeletons.
Raghuraman RN; Upasani S; Gonzales A; Aviles J; Cha J; Srinivasan D
IISE Trans Occup Ergon Hum Factors; 2023; 11(3-4):71-80. PubMed ID: 37747446
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Voluntary control of wearable robotic exoskeletons by patients with paresis via neuromechanical modeling.
Durandau G; Farina D; Asín-Prieto G; Dimbwadyo-Terrer I; Lerma-Lara S; Pons JL; Moreno JC; Sartori M
J Neuroeng Rehabil; 2019 Jul; 16(1):91. PubMed ID: 31315633
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Glenohumeral joint trajectory tracking for improving the shoulder compliance of the upper limb rehabilitation robot.
Tang Y; Hao D; Cao C; Shi P; Yu H; Luan X; Fang F
Med Eng Phys; 2023 Mar; 113():103961. PubMed ID: 36966005
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. A Self-Aligning Upper-Limb Exoskeleton Preserving Natural Shoulder Movements: Kinematic Compatibility Analysis.
Pan J; Astarita D; Baldoni A; Dell'Agnello F; Crea S; Vitiello N; Trigili E
IEEE Trans Neural Syst Rehabil Eng; 2023; 31():4954-4964. PubMed ID: 38064320
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Design and Experimental Evaluation of a Semi-Passive Upper-Limb Exoskeleton for Workers With Motorized Tuning of Assistance.
Grazi L; Trigili E; Proface G; Giovacchini F; Crea S; Vitiello N
IEEE Trans Neural Syst Rehabil Eng; 2020 Oct; 28(10):2276-2285. PubMed ID: 32755865
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Human Exteroception during Object Handling with an Upper Limb Exoskeleton.
Arcangeli D; Dubois O; Roby-Brami A; Famié S; de Marco G; Arnold G; Jarrassé N; Parry R
Sensors (Basel); 2023 May; 23(11):. PubMed ID: 37299885
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Dynamic and Static Assistive Strategies for a Tailored Occupational Back-Support Exoskeleton: Assessment on Real Tasks Carried Out by Railway Workers.
Di Natali C; Poliero T; Fanti V; Sposito M; Caldwell DG
Bioengineering (Basel); 2024 Feb; 11(2):. PubMed ID: 38391658
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
