BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

173 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 31969139)

  • 1. Pattern and correlates of out-of-pocket payment (OOP) on female sterilization in India, 1990-2014.
    Mohanty SK; Mishra S; Chatterjee S; Saggurti N
    BMC Womens Health; 2020 Jan; 20(1):13. PubMed ID: 31969139
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Who pays and how much? A cross-sectional study of out-of-pocket payment for modern contraception in Kenya.
    Radovich E; Dennis ML; Barasa E; Cavallaro FL; Wong KL; Borghi J; Lynch CA; Lyons-Amos M; Abuya T; Benova L
    BMJ Open; 2019 Feb; 9(2):e022414. PubMed ID: 30787074
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Understanding equity of institutional delivery in public health centre by level of care in India: an assessment using benefit incidence analysis.
    Mohanty SK; Mishra RS; Mishra S; Sen S
    Int J Equity Health; 2020 Dec; 19(1):217. PubMed ID: 33298077
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Is economic inequality in family planning in India associated with the private sector?
    Kumar A; Jain AK; Aruldas K; Mozumdar A; Shukla A; Acharya R; Ram F; Saggurti N
    J Biosoc Sci; 2020 Mar; 52(2):248-259. PubMed ID: 31232242
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Reducing out-of-pocket expenditures to reduce poverty: a disaggregated analysis at rural-urban and state level in India.
    Garg CC; Karan AK
    Health Policy Plan; 2009 Mar; 24(2):116-28. PubMed ID: 19095685
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Do poor people in the poorer states pay more for healthcare in India?
    Dash A; Mohanty SK
    BMC Public Health; 2019 Jul; 19(1):1020. PubMed ID: 31362727
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Levels, patterns and determinants of using reversible contraceptives for limiting family planning in India: evidence from National Family Health Survey, 2015-16.
    Rahaman M; Singh R; Chouhan P; Roy A; Ajmer S; Rana MJ
    BMC Womens Health; 2022 Apr; 22(1):124. PubMed ID: 35439954
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Incentives and disincentives in the Indian family welfare program.
    Satia JK; Maru RM
    Stud Fam Plann; 1986; 17(3):136-45. PubMed ID: 3726902
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Utilization of the state led public private partnership program "Chiranjeevi Yojana" to promote facility births in Gujarat, India: a cross sectional community based study.
    Yasobant S; Vora KS; Shewade HD; Annerstedt KS; Isaakidis P; Mavalankar DV; Dholakia NB; De Costa A
    BMC Health Serv Res; 2016 Jul; 16():266. PubMed ID: 27421254
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Costs incurred and determinants of out-of-pocket payments for child delivery care in India: Evidence from a nationally representative household survey.
    Krishnamoorthy Y; Ganesh K; Sakthivel M; Priyan S; Rehman T; Surendran G
    Int J Health Plann Manage; 2020 Jan; 35(1):e167-e177. PubMed ID: 31709605
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Dominance of sterilization and alternative choices of contraception in India: an appraisal of the socioeconomic impact.
    de Oliveira IT; Dias JG; Padmadas SS
    PLoS One; 2014; 9(1):e86654. PubMed ID: 24489759
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Public funding of contraceptive, sterilization and abortion services, 1982.
    Nestor B; Gold RB
    Fam Plann Perspect; 1984; 16(3):128-33. PubMed ID: 6432576
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Out-of-pocket expenditure and distress financing on institutional delivery in India.
    Mishra S; Mohanty SK
    Int J Equity Health; 2019 Jun; 18(1):99. PubMed ID: 31238928
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Community-level effect of the reproductive health vouchers program on out-of-pocket spending on family planning and safe motherhood services in Kenya.
    Obare F; Warren C; Kanya L; Abuya T; Bellows B
    BMC Health Serv Res; 2015 Aug; 15():343. PubMed ID: 26302826
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Sterilization project offers model for better care.
    Finger WR
    Netw Res Triangle Park N C; 1993 Aug; 14(1):21-3. PubMed ID: 12345034
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Out-of-pocket expenditure and its determinants in the context of private healthcare sector expansion in sub-Saharan Africa urban cities: evidence from household survey in Ouagadougou, Burkina Faso.
    Beogo I; Huang N; Gagnon MP; Amendah DD
    BMC Res Notes; 2016 Jan; 9():34. PubMed ID: 26795567
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Do fertility intentions and behaviour influence sterilization in Sri Lanka?
    De Silva WI
    Asia Pac Popul J; 1992 Dec; 7(4):41-60. PubMed ID: 12317940
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Cost of hospitalization for childbirth in India: how equitable it is in the post-NRHM era?
    Tripathy JP; Shewade HD; Mishra S; Kumar AMV; Harries AD
    BMC Res Notes; 2017 Aug; 10(1):409. PubMed ID: 28810897
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Public funding for contraceptive, sterilization and abortion services, 1994.
    Sollom T; Gold RB; Saul R
    Fam Plann Perspect; 1996; 28(4):166-73. PubMed ID: 8853282
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Public funding for contraceptive, sterilization and abortion services, fiscal year 1992.
    Daley D; Gold RB
    Fam Plann Perspect; 1993; 25(6):244-51. PubMed ID: 8313948
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.