324 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 31969362)
1. Direct and indirect healthcare costs of lung cancer CT screening in Denmark: a registry study.
Jensen MD; Siersma V; Rasmussen JF; Brodersen J
BMJ Open; 2020 Jan; 10(1):e031768. PubMed ID: 31969362
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Healthcare costs in the Danish randomised controlled lung cancer CT-screening trial: a registry study.
Rasmussen JF; Siersma V; Pedersen JH; Heleno B; Saghir Z; Brodersen J
Lung Cancer; 2014 Mar; 83(3):347-55. PubMed ID: 24418526
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Psychosocial consequences in the Danish randomised controlled lung cancer screening trial (DLCST).
Rasmussen JF; Siersma V; Pedersen JH; Brodersen J
Lung Cancer; 2015 Jan; 87(1):65-72. PubMed ID: 25433982
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. The effect of direct referral for fast CT scan in early lung cancer detection in general practice. A clinical, cluster-randomised trial.
Guldbrandt LM
Dan Med J; 2015 Mar; 62(3):. PubMed ID: 25748876
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Performance and Cost-Effectiveness of Computed Tomography Lung Cancer Screening Scenarios in a Population-Based Setting: A Microsimulation Modeling Analysis in Ontario, Canada.
Ten Haaf K; Tammemägi MC; Bondy SJ; van der Aalst CM; Gu S; McGregor SE; Nicholas G; de Koning HJ; Paszat LF
PLoS Med; 2017 Feb; 14(2):e1002225. PubMed ID: 28170394
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Psychosocial consequences of false positives in the Danish Lung Cancer CT Screening Trial: a nested matched cohort study.
Rasmussen JF; Siersma V; Malmqvist J; Brodersen J
BMJ Open; 2020 Jun; 10(6):e034682. PubMed ID: 32503869
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. 'Reduced' HUNT model outperforms NLST and NELSON study criteria in predicting lung cancer in the Danish screening trial.
Røe OD; Markaki M; Tsamardinos I; Lagani V; Nguyen OTD; Pedersen JH; Saghir Z; Ashraf HG
BMJ Open Respir Res; 2019; 6(1):e000512. PubMed ID: 31803478
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Contamination during 4 years of annual CT screening in the Danish Lung Cancer Screening Trial (DLCST).
Saghir Z; Ashraf H; Dirksen A; Brodersen J; Pedersen JH
Lung Cancer; 2011 Mar; 71(3):323-7. PubMed ID: 20619924
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. CT-Screening for lung cancer does not increase the use of anxiolytic or antidepressant medication.
Kaerlev L; Iachina M; Pedersen JH; Green A; Nørgård BM
BMC Cancer; 2012 May; 12():188. PubMed ID: 22621716
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Cost-Effectiveness Analysis of Lung Cancer Screening in the United States: A Comparative Modeling Study.
Criss SD; Cao P; Bastani M; Ten Haaf K; Chen Y; Sheehan DF; Blom EF; Toumazis I; Jeon J; de Koning HJ; Plevritis SK; Meza R; Kong CY
Ann Intern Med; 2019 Dec; 171(11):796-804. PubMed ID: 31683314
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Smoking habits in the randomised Danish Lung Cancer Screening Trial with low-dose CT: final results after a 5-year screening programme.
Ashraf H; Saghir Z; Dirksen A; Pedersen JH; Thomsen LH; Døssing M; Tønnesen P
Thorax; 2014 Jun; 69(6):574-9. PubMed ID: 24443174
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Participation bias in a randomised trial of screening for lung cancer.
Hestbech MS; Siersma V; Dirksen A; Pedersen JH; Brodersen J
Lung Cancer; 2011 Sep; 73(3):325-31. PubMed ID: 21324544
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Did psychosocial status, sociodemographics and smoking status affect non-attendance in control participants in the Danish Lung Cancer Screening Trial? A nested observational study.
Malmqvist J; Siersma V; Thorsen H; Heleno B; Rasmussen JF; Brodersen J
BMJ Open; 2020 Feb; 10(2):e030871. PubMed ID: 32086352
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Cost of screening for lung cancer in Australia.
Marshall HM; Finn N; Bowman RV; Passmore LH; McCaul EM; Yang IA; Connelly L; Fong KM
Intern Med J; 2019 Nov; 49(11):1392-1399. PubMed ID: 31336016
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. [Economic impact of lung cancer screening in France: A modeling study].
Gendarme S; Perrot É; Reskot F; Bhoowabul V; Fourre G; Souquet PJ; Milleron B; Couraud S
Rev Mal Respir; 2017 Sep; 34(7):717-728. PubMed ID: 26585377
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Psychosocial consequences of a three-month follow-up after receiving an abnormal lung cancer CT-screening result: A longitudinal survey.
Damhus CS; Quentin JG; Malmqvist J; Siersma V; Brodersen J
Lung Cancer; 2021 May; 155():46-52. PubMed ID: 33725548
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Cost-effectiveness of Lung Cancer Screening in Canada.
Goffin JR; Flanagan WM; Miller AB; Fitzgerald NR; Memon S; Wolfson MC; Evans WK
JAMA Oncol; 2015 Sep; 1(6):807-13. PubMed ID: 26226181
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. The Danish Cardiovascular Screening Trial (DANCAVAS): study protocol for a randomized controlled trial.
Diederichsen AC; Rasmussen LM; Søgaard R; Lambrechtsen J; Steffensen FH; Frost L; Egstrup K; Urbonaviciene G; Busk M; Olsen MH; Mickley H; Hallas J; Lindholt JS
Trials; 2015 Dec; 16():554. PubMed ID: 26637993
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Cumulative incidence of false-positive test results in lung cancer screening: a randomized trial.
Croswell JM; Baker SG; Marcus PM; Clapp JD; Kramer BS
Ann Intern Med; 2010 Apr; 152(8):505-12, W176-80. PubMed ID: 20404381
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Effect of CT screening on smoking habits at 1-year follow-up in the Danish Lung Cancer Screening Trial (DLCST).
Ashraf H; Tønnesen P; Holst Pedersen J; Dirksen A; Thorsen H; Døssing M
Thorax; 2009 May; 64(5):388-92. PubMed ID: 19052048
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
