These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

151 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 31970787)

  • 1. Association between surgical approach and survival following resection of abdominopelvic malignancies.
    Yuce TK; Ellis RJ; Chung J; Merkow RP; Yang AD; Soper NJ; Tanner EJ; Schaeffer EM; Bilimoria KY; Auffenberg GB
    J Surg Oncol; 2020 Mar; 121(4):620-629. PubMed ID: 31970787
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Impact of surgical approach on oncologic outcomes in women undergoing radical hysterectomy for cervical cancer.
    Cusimano MC; Baxter NN; Gien LT; Moineddin R; Liu N; Dossa F; Willows K; Ferguson SE
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2019 Dec; 221(6):619.e1-619.e24. PubMed ID: 31288006
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Comparison of survival outcomes between minimally invasive surgery and conventional open surgery for radical hysterectomy as primary treatment in patients with stage IB1-IIA2 cervical cancer.
    Kim SI; Cho JH; Seol A; Kim YI; Lee M; Kim HS; Chung HH; Kim JW; Park NH; Song YS
    Gynecol Oncol; 2019 Apr; 153(1):3-12. PubMed ID: 30642625
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Superior pathologic and clinical outcomes after minimally invasive rectal cancer resection, compared to open resection.
    Lee GC; Bordeianou LG; Francone TD; Blaszkowsky LS; Goldstone RN; Ricciardi R; Kunitake H; Qadan M
    Surg Endosc; 2020 Aug; 34(8):3435-3448. PubMed ID: 31844971
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Minimally invasive surgery for stage III colon adenocarcinoma is associated with less delay to initiation of adjuvant systemic therapy and improved survival.
    Lee L; Wong-Chong N; Kelly JJ; Nassif GJ; Albert MR; Monson JRT
    Surg Endosc; 2019 Feb; 33(2):460-470. PubMed ID: 29967992
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Survival After Minimally Invasive vs Open Radical Hysterectomy for Early-Stage Cervical Cancer: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.
    Nitecki R; Ramirez PT; Frumovitz M; Krause KJ; Tergas AI; Wright JD; Rauh-Hain JA; Melamed A
    JAMA Oncol; 2020 Jul; 6(7):1019-1027. PubMed ID: 32525511
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Effect of minimally invasive surgery on the risk for surgical site infections: results from the National Surgical Quality Improvement Program (NSQIP) Database.
    Gandaglia G; Ghani KR; Sood A; Meyers JR; Sammon JD; Schmid M; Varda B; Briganti A; Montorsi F; Sun M; Menon M; Kibel AS; Trinh QD
    JAMA Surg; 2014 Oct; 149(10):1039-44. PubMed ID: 25143176
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. The Impact of Conversion to Laparotomy in Rectal Cancer : A National Cancer Database Analysis of 57 574 Patients.
    Parascandola SA; Hota S; Tampo MMT; Sparks AD; Obias V
    Am Surg; 2020 Jul; 86(7):811-818. PubMed ID: 32683917
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Minimally invasive surgery versus laparotomy for radical hysterectomy in the management of early-stage cervical cancer: Survival outcomes.
    Brandt B; Sioulas V; Basaran D; Kuhn T; LaVigne K; Gardner GJ; Sonoda Y; Chi DS; Long Roche KC; Mueller JJ; Jewell EL; Broach VA; Zivanovic O; Abu-Rustum NR; Leitao MM
    Gynecol Oncol; 2020 Mar; 156(3):591-597. PubMed ID: 31918996
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Minimally invasive radical hysterectomy for early-stage cervical cancer: Volume-outcome relationship in the early experience period.
    Matsuo K; Matsuzaki S; Mandelbaum RS; Chang EJ; Klar M; Matsushima K; Grubbs BH; Roman LD; Wright JD
    Gynecol Oncol; 2020 Aug; 158(2):390-396. PubMed ID: 32473728
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Survival outcome of local excision versus radical resection of colon or rectal carcinoma: a Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) population-based study.
    Bhangu A; Brown G; Nicholls RJ; Wong J; Darzi A; Tekkis P
    Ann Surg; 2013 Oct; 258(4):563-9; discussion 569-71. PubMed ID: 23979270
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Minimally Invasive Colorectal Cancer Surgery in Europe: Implementation and Outcomes.
    Babaei M; Balavarca Y; Jansen L; Gondos A; Lemmens V; Sjövall A; Brge Johannesen T; Moreau M; Gabriel L; Gonçalves AF; Bento MJ; van de Velde T; Kempfer LR; Becker N; Ulrich A; Ulrich CM; Schrotz-King P; Brenner H
    Medicine (Baltimore); 2016 May; 95(22):e3812. PubMed ID: 27258522
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Comparison of laparoscopic and open radical hysterectomy in cervical cancer patients with tumor size ≤2 cm.
    Chen X; Zhao N; Ye P; Chen J; Nan X; Zhao H; Zhou K; Zhang Y; Xue J; Zhou H; Shang H; Zhu H; Leanne VM; Yan X
    Int J Gynecol Cancer; 2020 May; 30(5):564-571. PubMed ID: 32276941
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Minimally Invasive Surgery for Rectal Adenocarcinoma Shows Promising Outcomes Compared to Laparotomy, a National Cancer Database Observational Analysis.
    Skancke M; Schoolfield C; Umapathi B; Amdur R; Brody F; Obias V
    J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A; 2019 Feb; 29(2):218-224. PubMed ID: 30431390
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Minimally invasive versus open total mesorectal excision for rectal cancer: Long-term results from a case-matched study of 633 patients.
    Cho MS; Kim CW; Baek SJ; Hur H; Min BS; Baik SH; Lee KY; Kim NK
    Surgery; 2015 Jun; 157(6):1121-9. PubMed ID: 25737005
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Minimally invasive radical hysterectomy: an analysis of oncologic outcomes from Hospital Italiano (Argentina).
    Odetto D; Puga MC; Saadi J; Noll F; Perrotta M
    Int J Gynecol Cancer; 2019 Jun; 29(5):863-868. PubMed ID: 31155517
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Minimally invasive surgical management of early-stage cervical cancer: an analysis of the risk factors of surgical complications and of oncologic outcomes.
    Garabedian C; Merlot B; Bresson L; Tresch E; Narducci F; Leblanc E
    Int J Gynecol Cancer; 2015 May; 25(4):714-21. PubMed ID: 25647258
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Trachelectomy for reproductive-aged women with early-stage cervical cancer: minimally invasive surgery versus laparotomy.
    Matsuo K; Chen L; Mandelbaum RS; Melamed A; Roman LD; Wright JD
    Am J Obstet Gynecol; 2019 May; 220(5):469.e1-469.e13. PubMed ID: 30802438
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Radical Hysterectomy: Efficacy and Safety in the Dawn of Minimally Invasive Techniques.
    Gil-Moreno A; Carbonell-Socias M; Salicrú S; Centeno-Mediavilla C; Franco-Camps S; Colas E; Oaknin A; Pérez-Benavente A; Díaz-Feijoo B
    J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2019; 26(3):492-500. PubMed ID: 29908339
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Insurance Status, Not Race, is Associated With Use of Minimally Invasive Surgical Approach for Rectal Cancer.
    Turner M; Adam MA; Sun Z; Kim J; Ezekian B; Yerokun B; Mantyh C; Migaly J
    Ann Surg; 2017 Apr; 265(4):774-781. PubMed ID: 27163956
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.