432 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 31971307)
1. Evaluation of Stress Distribution in Tooth-Supported Fixed Dental Prostheses Made of Translucent Zirconia with Variations in Framework Designs: A Three-Dimensional Finite Element Analysis.
Bakitian F; Papia E; Larsson C; Vult von Steyern P
J Prosthodont; 2020 Apr; 29(4):315-322. PubMed ID: 31971307
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Effect of different semimonolithic designs on fracture resistance and fracture mode of translucent and high-translucent zirconia crowns.
Bakitian F; Seweryniak P; Papia E; Larsson C; Vult von Steyern P
Clin Cosmet Investig Dent; 2018; 10():51-60. PubMed ID: 29628778
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. STRESS DISTRIBUTION OF MONOLITHIC AND VENEERED THREE-UNIT ZIRCONIA FDPS: A FINITE ELEMENT ANALYSIS.
Alsarani MM; El-Mowaf OY; Coyle TW; Rizkalla A; Fava J
Int J Prosthodont; 2024 Jun; (3):112-122. PubMed ID: 37196037
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Influence of residual thermal stresses on the edge chipping resistance of PFM and veneered zirconia structures: Experimental and FEA study.
Tanaka CB; Ballester RY; De Souza GM; Zhang Y; Meira JBC
Dent Mater; 2019 Feb; 35(2):344-355. PubMed ID: 30579589
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Residual thermal stress simulation in three-dimensional molar crown systems: a finite element analysis.
Bonfante EA; Rafferty BT; Silva NR; Hanan JC; Rekow ED; Thompson VP; Coelho PG
J Prosthodont; 2012 Oct; 21(7):529-34. PubMed ID: 22672470
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Load-Bearing Capacity of Monolithic Zirconia Fixed Dental Prostheses Fabricated with Different Connector Designs and Embrasure Shaping Methods.
Bakitian F; Seweryniak P; Papia E; Larsson C; Vult von Steyern P
J Prosthodont; 2019 Jan; 28(1):64-70. PubMed ID: 30478870
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Effect of feldspathic porcelain layering on the marginal fit of zirconia and titanium complete-arch fixed implant-supported frameworks.
Yilmaz B; Alshahrani FA; Kale E; Johnston WM
J Prosthet Dent; 2018 Jul; 120(1):71-78. PubMed ID: 29426786
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Static and Fatigue Loading of Veneered Implant-Supported Fixed Dental Prostheses.
Rayyan MM; Abdallah J; Segaan LG; Bonfante EA; Osman E
J Prosthodont; 2020 Oct; 29(8):679-685. PubMed ID: 32271486
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. A randomized controlled clinical trial of 3-unit posterior zirconia-ceramic fixed dental prostheses (FDP) with layered or pressed veneering ceramics: 3-year results.
Naenni N; Bindl A; Sax C; Hämmerle C; Sailer I
J Dent; 2015 Nov; 43(11):1365-70. PubMed ID: 26234623
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Current status of zirconia restoration.
Miyazaki T; Nakamura T; Matsumura H; Ban S; Kobayashi T
J Prosthodont Res; 2013 Oct; 57(4):236-61. PubMed ID: 24140561
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Zirconium dioxide based dental restorations. Studies on clinical performance and fracture behaviour.
Larsson C
Swed Dent J Suppl; 2011; (213):9-84. PubMed ID: 21919311
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Influence of connector design and material composition and veneering on the stress distribution of all-ceramic fixed dental prostheses: a finite element study.
Möllers K; Pätzold W; Parkot D; Kirsten A; Güth JF; Edelhoff D; Fischer H
Dent Mater; 2011 Aug; 27(8):e171-5. PubMed ID: 21592550
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Residual stress of porcelain-fused to zirconia 3-unit fixed dental prostheses measured by nanoindentation.
Fardin VP; Bonfante EA; Coelho PG; Janal MN; Tovar N; Witek L; Bordin D; Bonfante G
Dent Mater; 2018 Feb; 34(2):260-271. PubMed ID: 29258696
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Effect of veneering materials on fracture loads of implant-supported zirconia molar fixed dental prostheses.
Kondo T; Komine F; Honda J; Takata H; Moriya Y
J Prosthodont Res; 2019 Apr; 63(2):140-144. PubMed ID: 30446411
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Effect of Veneering Methods on Zirconia Framework-Veneer Ceramic Adhesion and Fracture Resistance of Single Crowns.
Kanat-Ertürk B; Çömlekoğlu EM; Dündar-Çömlekoğlu M; Özcan M; Güngör MA
J Prosthodont; 2015 Dec; 24(8):620-8. PubMed ID: 25319017
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Conventional and modified veneered zirconia vs. metalloceramic: fatigue and finite element analysis.
Silva NR; Bonfante E; Rafferty BT; Zavanelli RA; Martins LL; Rekow ED; Thompson VP; Coehlo PG
J Prosthodont; 2012 Aug; 21(6):433-9. PubMed ID: 22672220
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Effect of gingival ceramic veneer thickness on the fracture strength of zirconia-based fixed dental prostheses.
Gabbert O; Ohlmann B; Schmitter M; Farhan D; Becker F; Rammelsberg P
Am J Dent; 2010 Jun; 23(3):147-51. PubMed ID: 20718211
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. The influence of zirconia coping designs on maximum principal stress distribution in all-ceramic premolar crowns: A finite element analysis.
Diker B; Erkut S
Am J Dent; 2019 Oct; 32(5):255-259. PubMed ID: 31675195
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Fracture resistance of zirconia-composite veneered crowns in comparison with zirconia-porcelain crowns.
Alsadon O; Patrick D; Johnson A; Pollington S; Wood D
Dent Mater J; 2017 May; 36(3):289-295. PubMed ID: 28190816
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Effect of various veneering techniques on mechanical strength of computer-controlled zirconia framework designs.
Kanat B; Cömlekoğlu EM; Dündar-Çömlekoğlu M; Hakan Sen B; Ozcan M; Ali Güngör M
J Prosthodont; 2014 Aug; 23(6):445-55. PubMed ID: 24417370
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
