207 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 31971351)
1. Chyle leakage after robotic and open pancreaticoduodenectomy.
Shyr BU; Shyr BS; Chen SC; Shyr YM; Wang SE
J Hepatobiliary Pancreat Sci; 2020 May; 27(5):273-279. PubMed ID: 31971351
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Mesopancreas level 3 dissection in robotic pancreaticoduodenectomy.
Shyr BU; Shyr BS; Chen SC; Shyr YM; Wang SE
Surgery; 2021 Feb; 169(2):362-368. PubMed ID: 32896373
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Surgical, survival, and oncological outcomes after vascular resection in robotic and open pancreaticoduodenectomy.
Shyr BU; Chen SC; Shyr YM; Wang SE
Surg Endosc; 2020 Jan; 34(1):377-383. PubMed ID: 30963260
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Robotic and open pancreaticoduodenectomy: results from Taipei Veterans General Hospital in Taiwan.
Shyr BU; Shyr BS; Chen SC; Shyr YM; Wang SE
Updates Surg; 2021 Jun; 73(3):939-946. PubMed ID: 33068270
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Safety and oncologic efficacy of robotic compared to open pancreaticoduodenectomy after neoadjuvant chemotherapy for pancreatic cancer.
Nassour I; Tohme S; Hoehn R; Adam MA; Zureikat AH; Alessandro P
Surg Endosc; 2021 May; 35(5):2248-2254. PubMed ID: 32440928
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Systematic review and meta-analysis of robotic versus open pancreaticoduodenectomy.
Peng L; Lin S; Li Y; Xiao W
Surg Endosc; 2017 Aug; 31(8):3085-3097. PubMed ID: 27928665
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Surgical methods influence on the risk of anastomotic fistula after pancreaticoduodenectomy: a systematic review and network meta-analysis.
Wang K; Dong SS; Zhang W; Ni YY; Xie F; Wang JC; Wang XH; Li YW
Surg Endosc; 2023 May; 37(5):3380-3397. PubMed ID: 36627536
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Operative results and patient satisfaction after robotic pancreaticoduodenectomy.
Shyr BU; Shyr BS; Chen SC; Chang IW; Shyr YM; Wang SE
Asian J Surg; 2020 Apr; 43(4):519-525. PubMed ID: 31606357
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Robotic approach mitigates the effect of major complications on survival after pancreaticoduodenectomy for periampullary cancer.
Meyyappan T; Wilson GC; Zeh HJ; Hogg ME; Lee KK; Zureikat AH; Paniccia A
Surg Endosc; 2023 Feb; 37(2):1181-1187. PubMed ID: 36163566
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Robotic pancreaticoduodenectomy may offer improved oncologic outcomes over open surgery: a propensity-matched single-institution study.
Baimas-George M; Watson M; Murphy KJ; Iannitti D; Baker E; Ocuin L; Vrochides D; Martinie JB
Surg Endosc; 2020 Aug; 34(8):3644-3649. PubMed ID: 32328825
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Reappraisal of surgical and survival outcomes of 500 consecutive cases of robotic pancreaticoduodenectomy.
Shyr BS; Shyr YM; Chen SC; Wang SE; Shyr BU
J Hepatobiliary Pancreat Sci; 2024 Feb; 31(2):99-109. PubMed ID: 37881144
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Robotic-assisted versus open pancreaticoduodenectomy for patients with benign and malignant periampullary disease: a systematic review and meta-analysis of short-term outcomes.
Podda M; Gerardi C; Di Saverio S; Marino MV; Davies RJ; Pellino G; Pisanu A
Surg Endosc; 2020 Jun; 34(6):2390-2409. PubMed ID: 32072286
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Robotic-assisted versus open pancreaticoduodenectomy: the results of a case-matched comparison.
Marino MV; Podda M; Gomez Ruiz M; Fernandez CC; Guarrasi D; Gomez Fleitas M
J Robot Surg; 2020 Jun; 14(3):493-502. PubMed ID: 31473878
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Analysis of 102 Fully Robotic Pancreaticoduodenectomies: Clinical and Financial Outcomes.
Mejia A; Shah J; Vivian E; Acharya P
Pancreas; 2020; 49(5):668-674. PubMed ID: 32433405
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Comparison of robotic and open pancreaticoduodenectomy for primary nonampullary duodenal adenocarcinoma: a retrospective cohort study.
Wang W; Liu Q; Zhao ZM; Tan XL; Wang ZZ; Zhang KD; Liu R
Langenbecks Arch Surg; 2022 Feb; 407(1):167-173. PubMed ID: 34471952
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. A Multi-institutional Comparison of Perioperative Outcomes of Robotic and Open Pancreaticoduodenectomy.
Zureikat AH; Postlewait LM; Liu Y; Gillespie TW; Weber SM; Abbott DE; Ahmad SA; Maithel SK; Hogg ME; Zenati M; Cho CS; Salem A; Xia B; Steve J; Nguyen TK; Keshava HB; Chalikonda S; Walsh RM; Talamonti MS; Stocker SJ; Bentrem DJ; Lumpkin S; Kim HJ; Zeh HJ; Kooby DA
Ann Surg; 2016 Oct; 264(4):640-9. PubMed ID: 27433907
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. What are the true benefits of robotic pancreaticoduodenectomy for patients with pancreatic cancer?
Stefanova I; Vescio F; Nickel F; Merali N; Ammendola M; Lahiri RP; Pencavel TD; Worthington TR; Frampton AE
Expert Rev Gastroenterol Hepatol; 2024; 18(4-5):133-139. PubMed ID: 38712525
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Transition from open and laparoscopic to robotic pancreaticoduodenectomy in a UK tertiary referral hepatobiliary and pancreatic centre - Early experience of robotic pancreaticoduodenectomy.
Gall TM; Pencavel TD; Cunningham D; Nicol D; Jiao LR
HPB (Oxford); 2020 Nov; 22(11):1637-1644. PubMed ID: 32247586
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Propensity score-matched comparison of the oncological feasibility and survival outcomes for pancreatic adenocarcinoma with robotic and open pancreatoduodenectomy.
Shyr BU; Shyr BS; Chen SC; Shyr YM; Wang SE
Surg Endosc; 2022 Feb; 36(2):1507-1514. PubMed ID: 33770276
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Epidemiology of healthcare-associated infections and outcomes among open and robotic pancreatoduodenectomy: A retrospective study from 2013 to 2022.
Yu ZH; Du MM; Lin L; Liu BW; Bai YL; Liu ML; Li JX; Lu QB; Liu YX; Yao HW
J Gastroenterol Hepatol; 2023 Dec; 38(12):2238-2246. PubMed ID: 37926431
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
