426 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 31972064)
1. Vegetation management for urban park visitors: a mixed methods approach in Portland, Oregon.
Talal ML; Santelmann MV
Ecol Appl; 2020 Jun; 30(4):e02079. PubMed ID: 31972064
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Ecosystem services: Urban parks under a magnifying glass.
Mexia T; Vieira J; Príncipe A; Anjos A; Silva P; Lopes N; Freitas C; Santos-Reis M; Correia O; Branquinho C; Pinho P
Environ Res; 2018 Jan; 160():469-478. PubMed ID: 29078140
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Ectomycorrhizal Fungal Communities in Urban Parks Are Similar to Those in Natural Forests but Shaped by Vegetation and Park Age.
Hui N; Liu X; Kotze DJ; Jumpponen A; Francini G; Setälä H
Appl Environ Microbiol; 2017 Dec; 83(23):. PubMed ID: 28970220
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. A demand index for recreational ecosystem services associated with urban parks in Beijing, China.
Sun R; Li F; Chen L
J Environ Manage; 2019 Dec; 251():109612. PubMed ID: 31563053
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. The ecological services of plant communities in parks for climate control and recreation-A case study in Shanghai, China.
Li Z; Chen D; Cai S; Che S
PLoS One; 2018; 13(4):e0196445. PubMed ID: 29694401
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. The Influence of Urban Park Attributes on User Preferences: Evaluation of Virtual Parks in an Online Stated-Choice Experiment.
van Vliet E; Dane G; Weijs-Perrée M; van Leeuwen E; van Dinter M; van den Berg P; Borgers A; Chamilothori K
Int J Environ Res Public Health; 2020 Dec; 18(1):. PubMed ID: 33396623
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Green spaces are not all the same for the provision of air purification and climate regulation services: The case of urban parks.
Vieira J; Matos P; Mexia T; Silva P; Lopes N; Freitas C; Correia O; Santos-Reis M; Branquinho C; Pinho P
Environ Res; 2018 Jan; 160():306-313. PubMed ID: 29040950
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Soil microbial communities are shaped by vegetation type and park age in cities under cold climate.
Hui N; Jumpponen A; Francini G; Kotze DJ; Liu X; Romantschuk M; Strömmer R; Setälä H
Environ Microbiol; 2017 Mar; 19(3):1281-1295. PubMed ID: 28063185
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Toward the improvement of trail classification in national parks using the recreation opportunity spectrum approach.
Oishi Y
Environ Manage; 2013 Jun; 51(6):1126-36. PubMed ID: 23615956
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Visitor Capacity Considering Social Distancing in Urban Parks with Agent-Based Modeling.
Yue Z; Burley JB; Cui Z; Lei H; Zhou J
Int J Environ Res Public Health; 2021 Jun; 18(13):. PubMed ID: 34206436
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Urban parks provide ecosystem services by retaining metals and nutrients in soils.
Setälä H; Francini G; Allen JA; Jumpponen A; Hui N; Kotze DJ
Environ Pollut; 2017 Dec; 231(Pt 1):451-461. PubMed ID: 28830018
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. A Comparative Study of Urban Park Preferences in China and The Netherlands.
van den Berg P; Weijs-Perrée M; Dane G; van Vliet E; Liu H; Sun S; Borgers A
Int J Environ Res Public Health; 2022 Apr; 19(8):. PubMed ID: 35457506
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. The nature of the pandemic: Exploring the negative impacts of the COVID-19 pandemic upon recreation visitor behaviors and experiences in parks and protected areas.
Ferguson MD; Lynch ML; Evensen D; Ferguson LA; Barcelona R; Giles G; Leberman M
J Outdoor Recreat Tour; 2023 Mar; 41():100498. PubMed ID: 37521260
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Rethinking urban park irrigation under climate change.
Doll C; Polyakov M; Pannell DJ; Burton MP
J Environ Manage; 2022 Jul; 314():115012. PubMed ID: 35462251
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Ecohydrological consequences of tree removal in an urban park evaluated using open data, free software and a minimalist measuring campaign.
Deutscher J; Kupec P; Kučera A; Urban J; Ledesma JLJ; Futter M
Sci Total Environ; 2019 Mar; 655():1495-1504. PubMed ID: 30577140
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Active use and perceptions of parks as urban assets for physical activity: A mixed-methods study.
Fontán-Vela M; Rivera-Navarro J; Gullón P; Díez J; Anguelovski I; Franco M
Health Place; 2021 Sep; 71():102660. PubMed ID: 34454253
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Visitor Preferences for Visual Changes in Bark Beetle-Impacted Forest Recreation Settings in the United States and Germany.
Arnberger A; Ebenberger M; Schneider IE; Cottrell S; Schlueter AC; von Ruschkowski E; Venette RC; Snyder SA; Gobster PH
Environ Manage; 2018 Feb; 61(2):209-223. PubMed ID: 29273996
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Reprint of: COVID-19 messaging in U.S. state parks: Extensions of the outdoor recreation strategies and practices framework unmasked by the pandemic.
Perry EE; Coleman KJ; Iretskaia TA; Baer JM; Magnus LF; Pettengill PR
J Outdoor Recreat Tour; 2023 Mar; 41():100627. PubMed ID: 37521269
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. COVID-19 messaging in U.S. state parks: Extensions of the outdoor recreation strategies and practices framework unmasked by the pandemic.
Perry EE; Coleman KJ; Iretskaia TA; Baer JM; Magnus LF; Pettengill PR
J Outdoor Recreat Tour; 2021 Dec; 36():100449. PubMed ID: 38620957
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Park Visitors' Place Attachment and Climate Change-related Displacement: Potential Shifts in Who, Where, and When.
Perry EE; Xiao X; Nettles JM; Iretskaia TA; Manning RE
Environ Manage; 2021 Jul; 68(1):73-86. PubMed ID: 33991206
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
