These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

249 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 31972477)

  • 21. Frontiers in molecular dynamics simulations of DNA.
    Pérez A; Luque FJ; Orozco M
    Acc Chem Res; 2012 Feb; 45(2):196-205. PubMed ID: 21830782
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Revealing Drug-Target Interactions with Computational Models and Algorithms.
    Zhou L; Li Z; Yang J; Tian G; Liu F; Wen H; Peng L; Chen M; Xiang J; Peng L
    Molecules; 2019 May; 24(9):. PubMed ID: 31052598
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Combining Molecular Dynamics and Machine Learning to Predict Self-Solvation Free Energies and Limiting Activity Coefficients.
    Gebhardt J; Kiesel M; Riniker S; Hansen N
    J Chem Inf Model; 2020 Nov; 60(11):5319-5330. PubMed ID: 32786697
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Machine Learning to Predict Binding Affinity.
    Bitencourt-Ferreira G; de Azevedo WF
    Methods Mol Biol; 2019; 2053():251-273. PubMed ID: 31452110
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Proceedings of the Second Workshop on Theory meets Industry (Erwin-Schrödinger-Institute (ESI), Vienna, Austria, 12-14 June 2007).
    Hafner J
    J Phys Condens Matter; 2008 Feb; 20(6):060301. PubMed ID: 21693862
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Machine Learning Force Fields and Coarse-Grained Variables in Molecular Dynamics: Application to Materials and Biological Systems.
    Gkeka P; Stoltz G; Barati Farimani A; Belkacemi Z; Ceriotti M; Chodera JD; Dinner AR; Ferguson AL; Maillet JB; Minoux H; Peter C; Pietrucci F; Silveira A; Tkatchenko A; Trstanova Z; Wiewiora R; Lelièvre T
    J Chem Theory Comput; 2020 Aug; 16(8):4757-4775. PubMed ID: 32559068
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Shape-based Machine Learning Models for the Potential Novel COVID-19 Protease Inhibitors Assisted by Molecular Dynamics Simulation.
    Nayarisseri A; Khandelwal R; Madhavi M; Selvaraj C; Panwar U; Sharma K; Hussain T; Singh SK
    Curr Top Med Chem; 2020; 20(24):2146-2167. PubMed ID: 32621718
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Comparison of the Performance of Machine Learning Models in Representing High-Dimensional Free Energy Surfaces and Generating Observables.
    Cendagorta JR; Tolpin J; Schneider E; Topper RQ; Tuckerman ME
    J Phys Chem B; 2020 May; 124(18):3647-3660. PubMed ID: 32275148
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. An Interpretable Convolutional Neural Network Framework for Analyzing Molecular Dynamics Trajectories: a Case Study on Functional States for G-Protein-Coupled Receptors.
    Li C; Liu J; Chen J; Yuan Y; Yu J; Gou Q; Guo Y; Pu X
    J Chem Inf Model; 2022 Mar; 62(6):1399-1410. PubMed ID: 35257580
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Improvement of the Force Field for
    Ikejo M; Watanabe H; Shimamura K; Tanaka S
    Molecules; 2021 Nov; 26(21):. PubMed ID: 34771103
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Improving Molecular-Dynamics Simulations for Solid-Liquid Interfaces with Machine-Learning Interatomic Potentials.
    Hou P; Tian Y; Meng X
    Chemistry; 2024 Sep; 30(49):e202401373. PubMed ID: 38877181
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Interpretable artificial intelligence and exascale molecular dynamics simulations to reveal kinetics: Applications to Alzheimer's disease.
    Martin W; Sheynkman G; Lightstone FC; Nussinov R; Cheng F
    Curr Opin Struct Biol; 2022 Feb; 72():103-113. PubMed ID: 34628220
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Recognition of protein allosteric states and residues: Machine learning approaches.
    Zhou H; Dong Z; Tao P
    J Comput Chem; 2018 Jul; 39(20):1481-1490. PubMed ID: 29604117
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Algorithms of GPU-enabled reactive force field (ReaxFF) molecular dynamics.
    Zheng M; Li X; Guo L
    J Mol Graph Model; 2013 Apr; 41():1-11. PubMed ID: 23454611
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Machine learning algorithms can classify outdoor terrain types during running using accelerometry data.
    Dixon PC; Schütte KH; Vanwanseele B; Jacobs JV; Dennerlein JT; Schiffman JM; Fournier PA; Hu B
    Gait Posture; 2019 Oct; 74():176-181. PubMed ID: 31539798
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. A Geometrical Analysis of Global Stability in Trained Feedback Networks.
    Mastrogiuseppe F; Ostojic S
    Neural Comput; 2019 Jun; 31(6):1139-1182. PubMed ID: 30979353
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Implementation of the force decomposition machine for molecular dynamics simulations.
    Borštnik U; Miller BT; Brooks BR; Janežič D
    J Mol Graph Model; 2012 Sep; 38():243-7. PubMed ID: 23085166
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Significance of the Chemical Environment of an Element in Nonadiabatic Molecular Dynamics: Feature Selection and Dimensionality Reduction with Machine Learning.
    How WB; Wang B; Chu W; Tkatchenko A; Prezhdo OV
    J Phys Chem Lett; 2021 Dec; 12(50):12026-12032. PubMed ID: 34902248
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. VAMPnets for deep learning of molecular kinetics.
    Mardt A; Pasquali L; Wu H; Noé F
    Nat Commun; 2018 Jan; 9(1):5. PubMed ID: 29295994
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Analyzing biological and artificial neural networks: challenges with opportunities for synergy?
    Barrett DG; Morcos AS; Macke JH
    Curr Opin Neurobiol; 2019 Apr; 55():55-64. PubMed ID: 30785004
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 13.