179 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 31972902)
1. Human Amniotic Membrane: A New Option for Graft Donor Sites - Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.
Abul A; Karam M; Rahman S
Int Wound J; 2020 Jun; 17(3):547-554. PubMed ID: 31972902
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Biological versus non-biological dressings in the management of split-thickness skin-graft donor sites: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
Rahman S; Langridge B; Al-Hadad A; Khan RA; Junejo MH; Mosahebi A
J Wound Care; 2020 Oct; 29(10):604-610. PubMed ID: 33052797
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. The use of modern dressings in managing split-thickness skin graft donor sites: a single-centre randomised controlled trial.
Kazanavičius M; Cepas A; Kolaityte V; Simoliuniene R; Rimdeika R
J Wound Care; 2017 Jun; 26(6):281-291. PubMed ID: 28598760
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Maximizing the safety of glycerol preserved human amniotic membrane as a biological dressing.
Zidan SM; Eleowa SA; Nasef MA; Abd-Almoktader MA; Elbatawy AM; Borhamy AG; Aboliela MA; Ali AM; Algamal MR
Burns; 2015 Nov; 41(7):1498-503. PubMed ID: 26188890
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Amniotic membrane for treating skin graft donor sites: A systematic review and meta-analysis.
Liang X; Zhou L; Yan J
Burns; 2020 May; 46(3):621-629. PubMed ID: 31623939
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Evaluation of human amniotic membrane as a wound dressing for split-thickness skin-graft donor sites.
Loeffelbein DJ; Rohleder NH; Eddicks M; Baumann CM; Stoeckelhuber M; Wolff KD; Drecoll E; Steinstraesser L; Hennerbichler S; Kesting MR
Biomed Res Int; 2014; 2014():572183. PubMed ID: 25003117
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. A prospective, randomised study of a novel transforming methacrylate dressing compared with a silver-containing sodium carboxymethylcellulose dressing on partial-thickness skin graft donor sites in burn patients.
Assadian O; Arnoldo B; Purdue G; Burris A; Skrinjar E; Duschek N; Leaper DJ
Int Wound J; 2015 Jun; 12(3):351-6. PubMed ID: 23919667
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. CICAFAST: comparison of a biological dressing composed of fetal fibroblasts and keratinocytes on a split-thickness skin graft donor site versus a traditional dressing: a randomized controlled trial.
Poinas A; Perrot P; Lorant J; Nerrière O; Nguyen JM; Saiagh S; Frenard C; Leduc A; Malard O; Espitalier F; Duteille F; Chiffoleau A; Vrignaud F; Khammari A; Dréno B
Trials; 2019 Oct; 20(1):612. PubMed ID: 31661012
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Comparison between Aquacel and Aquacel Foam dressing on split-thickness skin graft donor site.
Chiang SH; Xu X; Cheung DST; Hsu YH; Chen CE; Lin CH; Smith R; Lin CC
J Wound Care; 2021 Dec; 30(Sup12):S14-S20. PubMed ID: 34882003
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Polyurethane Versus Calcium Alginate Dressings for Split-Thickness Skin Graft Donor Site: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.
Alsaif A; Karam M; Aldubaikhi AA; Alghufaily A; Alhuwaishel K; Aldekhayel S
Cureus; 2021 Nov; 13(11):e20027. PubMed ID: 34987912
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. The use of moist wound-healing dressings in the management of split-thickness skin graft donor sites: a systematic review.
Wiechula R
Int J Nurs Pract; 2003 Apr; 9(2):S9-17. PubMed ID: 12694482
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Management of split-thickness skin graft donor sites: a randomized controlled trial of calcium alginate versus polyurethane film dressing.
Läuchli S; Hafner J; Ostheeren S; Mayer D; Barysch MJ; French LE
Dermatology; 2013; 227(4):361-6. PubMed ID: 24281776
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. An evaluation of five different dressing materials on split-thickness skin graft donor site and full-thickness cutaneous wounds: an experimental study.
Uraloğlu M; Livaoğlu M; Agdoğan Ö; Mungan S; Alhan E; Karaçal N
Int Wound J; 2014 Feb; 11(1):85-92. PubMed ID: 22943661
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Use of a novel chitosan-based dressing on split-thickness skin graft donor sites: a pilot study.
Varon DE; Smith JD; Bharadia DR; Shafique N; Sakthivel D; Halvorson EG; Nuutila K; Sinha I
J Wound Care; 2018 Jul; 27(Sup7):S12-S18. PubMed ID: 30008255
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Negative-pressure wound dressings to secure split-thickness skin grafts in the perineum.
Lee KT; Pyon JK; Lim SY; Mun GH; Oh KS; Bang SI
Int Wound J; 2014 Apr; 11(2):223-7. PubMed ID: 22958590
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Alginate dressing and polyurethane film versus paraffin gauze in the treatment of split-thickness skin graft donor sites: a randomized controlled pilot study.
Kaiser D; Hafner J; Mayer D; French LE; Läuchli S
Adv Skin Wound Care; 2013 Feb; 26(2):67-73. PubMed ID: 23337646
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Evaluation of an oxygen-diffusion dressing for accelerated healing of donor-site wounds.
Lairet KF; Baer D; Leas ML; Renz EM; Cancio LC
J Burn Care Res; 2014; 35(3):214-8. PubMed ID: 23877142
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Egg membrane as a new biological dressing in split-thickness skin graft donor sites: a preliminary clinical evaluation.
Yang JY; Chuang SS; Yang WG; Tsay PK
Chang Gung Med J; 2003 Mar; 26(3):153-9. PubMed ID: 12790218
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Evaluation of Dried Amniotic Membrane on Wound Healing at Split-Thickness Skin Graft Donor Sites: A Randomized, Placebo-Controlled, Double-blind Trial.
Vaheb M; Kohestani BM; Karrabi M; Khosrojerdi M; Khajeh M; Shahrestanaki E; Sahebkar M
Adv Skin Wound Care; 2020 Dec; 33(12):636-641. PubMed ID: 33021598
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. An evidence-based review of split-thickness skin graft donor site dressings.
Brown JE; Holloway SL
Int Wound J; 2018 Dec; 15(6):1000-1009. PubMed ID: 30117716
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]