These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

143 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 31973990)

  • 1. The Double Krackow Suture Technique Does Not Offer a Significant Benefit Compared to the Krackow Suture Technique in Subpectoral Biceps Tenodesis Using a Double-Loaded Suture Anchor.
    Hong CK; Hsu KL; Kuan FC; Chen Y; Hsu CC; Yeh ML; Su WR
    Arthroscopy; 2020 Mar; 36(3):701-707. PubMed ID: 31973990
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. High-Tensile Strength Tapes Show Greater Ultimate Failure Load and Less Stiffness Than High-Tensile Strength Sutures in a Subpectoral Biceps Tenodesis Porcine Model.
    Hong CK; Su WR; Kuan FC; Chen Y; Chiang CH; Hsu KL
    Arthrosc Sports Med Rehabil; 2020 Dec; 2(6):e795-e801. PubMed ID: 33376994
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Biomechanical Comparison of Subpectoral Biceps Tenodesis Onlay Techniques.
    Lacheta L; Rosenberg SI; Brady AW; Dornan GJ; Millett PJ
    Orthop J Sports Med; 2019 Oct; 7(10):2325967119876276. PubMed ID: 31663008
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Biomechanical evaluation of subpectoral biceps tenodesis: dual suture anchor versus interference screw fixation.
    Tashjian RZ; Henninger HB
    J Shoulder Elbow Surg; 2013 Oct; 22(10):1408-12. PubMed ID: 23415819
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Biomechanical Analysis of Lark-Loop, Lasso-Loop and Krackow Suture Technique in Tenodesis.
    Zhou M; Zhou C; Cui D; Long Y; Yan Y; Zheng Z; Meng K; Zhang J; Hou J; Yang R
    Orthop Surg; 2023 Apr; 15(4):1136-1143. PubMed ID: 36852476
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. All-suture anchor size and drill angle influence load to failure in a porcine model of subpectoral biceps tenodesis, a biomechanical study.
    Alt PS; Marx C; Braun S
    BMC Musculoskelet Disord; 2024 May; 25(1):408. PubMed ID: 38783272
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Biomechanical Comparison of All-Suture Anchor Fixation and Interference Screw Technique for Subpectoral Biceps Tenodesis.
    Chiang FL; Hong CK; Chang CH; Lin CL; Jou IM; Su WR
    Arthroscopy; 2016 Jul; 32(7):1247-52. PubMed ID: 27039966
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Biomechanical Analysis of All-Suture Suture Anchor Fixation Compared With Conventional Suture Anchors and Interference Screws for Biceps Tenodesis.
    Frank RM; Bernardoni ED; Veera SS; Waterman BR; Griffin JW; Shewman EF; Cole BJ; Romeo AA; Verma NN
    Arthroscopy; 2019 Jun; 35(6):1760-1768. PubMed ID: 31072716
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Biomechanical properties of suprapectoral biceps tenodesis with double-anchor knotless luggage tag sutures vs. subpectoral biceps tenodesis with single-anchor whipstitch suture using all-suture anchors.
    Nicolay RW; Jahandar A; Retzky JS; Kontaxis A; Verma NN; Fu MC
    JSES Int; 2023 Nov; 7(6):2393-2399. PubMed ID: 37969507
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Biomechanical Evaluation of a Transtendinous All-Suture Anchor Technique Versus Interference Screw Technique for Suprapectoral Biceps Tenodesis in a Cadaveric Model.
    Hong CK; Hsu KL; Kuan FC; Lin CL; Yeh ML; Su WR
    Arthroscopy; 2018 Jun; 34(6):1755-1761. PubMed ID: 29482858
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. The modified finger-trap suture technique: a biomechanical comparison of a novel suture technique for graft fixation.
    Su WR; Chu CH; Lin CL; Lin CJ; Jou IM; Chang CW
    Arthroscopy; 2012 May; 28(5):702-10. PubMed ID: 22261138
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Biomechanical comparison of intramedullary cortical button fixation and interference screw technique for subpectoral biceps tenodesis.
    Buchholz A; Martetschläger F; Siebenlist S; Sandmann GH; Hapfelmeier A; Lenich A; Millett PJ; Stöckle U; Elser F
    Arthroscopy; 2013 May; 29(5):845-53. PubMed ID: 23587927
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Increased Load to Failure in Biceps Tenodesis With All-Suture Suture Anchor Compared With Interference Screw: A Cadaveric Biomechanical Study.
    Smuin DM; Vannatta E; Ammerman B; Stauch CM; Lewis GS; Dhawan A
    Arthroscopy; 2021 Oct; 37(10):3016-3021. PubMed ID: 33895306
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Suprapectoral or subpectoral position for biceps tenodesis: biomechanical comparison of four different techniques in both positions.
    Patzer T; Santo G; Olender GD; Wellmann M; Hurschler C; Schofer MD
    J Shoulder Elbow Surg; 2012 Jan; 21(1):116-25. PubMed ID: 21493102
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Using Interconnected Knotless Anchor for Suprapectoral Biceps Tenodesis Could Offer Improved Biomechanical Properties in a Cadaveric Model.
    Kuan FC; Hsu KL; Yen JZ; Wen MJ; Yeh ML; Chen Y; Su WR
    Arthroscopy; 2020 Aug; 36(8):2047-2054. PubMed ID: 32259645
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Biomechanics of a novel technique for suprapectoral intraosseous biceps tenodesis.
    Sampatacos N; Gillette BP; Snyder SJ; Henninger HB
    J Shoulder Elbow Surg; 2016 Jan; 25(1):149-57. PubMed ID: 26344873
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Interference screw versus suture anchor fixation for subpectoral tenodesis of the proximal biceps tendon: a cadaveric study.
    Golish SR; Caldwell PE; Miller MD; Singanamala N; Ranawat AS; Treme G; Pearson SE; Costic R; Sekiya JK
    Arthroscopy; 2008 Oct; 24(10):1103-8. PubMed ID: 19028161
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Are Implant Choice and Surgical Approach Associated With Biceps Tenodesis Construct Strength? A Systematic Review and Meta-regression.
    Aida HF; Shi BY; Huish EG; McFarland EG; Srikumaran U
    Am J Sports Med; 2020 Apr; 48(5):1273-1280. PubMed ID: 31585053
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Long head biceps tenodesis with a knotless cinch suture anchor: a biomechanical analysis.
    Kaback LA; Gowda AL; Paller D; Green A; Blaine T
    Arthroscopy; 2015 May; 31(5):831-5. PubMed ID: 25660012
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Biomechanical comparison of arthroscopically performable techniques for suprapectoral biceps tenodesis.
    Patzer T; Rundic JM; Bobrowitsch E; Olender GD; Hurschler C; Schofer MD
    Arthroscopy; 2011 Aug; 27(8):1036-47. PubMed ID: 21704467
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.