These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

267 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 31974077)

  • 1. Effects of Susceptibility Artifacts on Perfusion MRI in Patients with Primary Brain Tumor: A Comparison of Arterial Spin-Labeling versus DSC.
    Maral H; Ertekin E; Tunçyürek Ö; Özsunar Y
    AJNR Am J Neuroradiol; 2020 Feb; 41(2):255-261. PubMed ID: 31974077
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Perfusion MR imaging of enhancing brain tumors: Comparison of arterial spin labeling technique with dynamic susceptibility contrast technique.
    Soni N; Dhanota DPS; Kumar S; Jaiswal AK; Srivastava AK
    Neurol India; 2017; 65(5):1046-1052. PubMed ID: 28879895
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Comparison between dynamic susceptibility contrast magnetic resonance imaging and arterial spin labeling techniques in distinguishing malignant from benign brain tumors.
    Ata ES; Turgut M; Eraslan C; Dayanır YÖ
    Eur J Radiol; 2016 Sep; 85(9):1545-53. PubMed ID: 27501887
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Tumor recurrence versus treatment effects in glioma: A comparative study of three dimensional pseudo-continuous arterial spin labeling and dynamic susceptibility contrast imaging.
    Xu Q; Liu Q; Ge H; Ge X; Wu J; Qu J; Xu K
    Medicine (Baltimore); 2017 Dec; 96(50):e9332. PubMed ID: 29390403
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Comparative analysis of arterial spin labeling and dynamic susceptibility contrast perfusion imaging for quantitative perfusion measurements of brain tumors.
    Jiang J; Zhao L; Zhang Y; Zhang S; Yao Y; Qin Y; Wang CY; Zhu W
    Int J Clin Exp Pathol; 2014; 7(6):2790-9. PubMed ID: 25031698
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Assesment of perfusion in glial tumors with arterial spin labeling; comparison with dynamic susceptibility contrast method.
    Cebeci H; Aydin O; Ozturk-Isik E; Gumus C; Inecikli F; Bekar A; Kocaeli H; Hakyemez B
    Eur J Radiol; 2014 Oct; 83(10):1914-9. PubMed ID: 25087109
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Comparison of three different MR perfusion techniques and MR spectroscopy for multiparametric assessment in distinguishing recurrent high-grade gliomas from stable disease.
    Seeger A; Braun C; Skardelly M; Paulsen F; Schittenhelm J; Ernemann U; Bisdas S
    Acad Radiol; 2013 Dec; 20(12):1557-65. PubMed ID: 24200483
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Correlation and Characteristics of Intravoxel Incoherent Motion and Arterial Spin Labeling Techniques Versus Multiple Parameters Obtained on Dynamic Susceptibility Contrast Perfusion MRI for Brain Tumors.
    Dolgorsuren EA; Harada M; Kanazawa Y; Abe T; Otomo M; Matsumoto Y; Mizobuchi Y; Nakajima K
    J Med Invest; 2019; 66(3.4):308-313. PubMed ID: 31656295
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Correlation of 3D Arterial Spin Labeling and Multi-Parametric Dynamic Susceptibility Contrast Perfusion MRI in Brain Tumors.
    Khashbat Md D; Abe Md T; Ganbold Md M; Iwamoto Md S; Uyama Md N; Irahara Md S; Otomi Md PhD Y; Harada Md PhD M; Kageji Md PhD T; Nagahiro Md PhD S
    J Med Invest; 2016; 63(3-4):175-81. PubMed ID: 27644554
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Quantification of blood flow in brain tumors: comparison of arterial spin labeling and dynamic susceptibility-weighted contrast-enhanced MR imaging.
    Warmuth C; Gunther M; Zimmer C
    Radiology; 2003 Aug; 228(2):523-32. PubMed ID: 12819338
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Periprocedural arterial spin labeling and dynamic susceptibility contrast perfusion in detection of cerebral blood flow in patients with acute ischemic syndrome.
    Nael K; Meshksar A; Liebeskind DS; Wang DJ; Ellingson BM; Salamon N; Villablanca JP;
    Stroke; 2013 Mar; 44(3):664-70. PubMed ID: 23391773
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Comparison of ASL and DSC perfusion methods in the evaluation of response to treatment in patients with a history of treatment for malignant brain tumor.
    Bayraktar ES; Duygulu G; Çetinoğlu YK; Gelal MF; Apaydın M; Ellidokuz H
    BMC Med Imaging; 2024 Mar; 24(1):70. PubMed ID: 38519901
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Comparative study of pulsed-continuous arterial spin labeling and dynamic susceptibility contrast imaging by histogram analysis in evaluation of glial tumors.
    Arisawa A; Watanabe Y; Tanaka H; Takahashi H; Matsuo C; Fujiwara T; Fujiwara M; Fujimoto Y; Tomiyama N
    Neuroradiology; 2018 Jun; 60(6):599-608. PubMed ID: 29705876
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Comparison of three-dimensional pseudo-continuous arterial spin labeling perfusion imaging with gradient-echo and spin-echo dynamic susceptibility contrast MRI.
    Wong AM; Yan FX; Liu HL
    J Magn Reson Imaging; 2014 Feb; 39(2):427-33. PubMed ID: 23677620
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Regional and voxel-wise comparisons of blood flow measurements between dynamic susceptibility contrast magnetic resonance imaging (DSC-MRI) and arterial spin labeling (ASL) in brain tumors.
    White CM; Pope WB; Zaw T; Qiao J; Naeini KM; Lai A; Nghiemphu PL; Wang JJ; Cloughesy TF; Ellingson BM
    J Neuroimaging; 2014; 24(1):23-30. PubMed ID: 22672084
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Quantitative analysis of hypoperfusion in acute stroke: arterial spin labeling versus dynamic susceptibility contrast.
    Nael K; Meshksar A; Liebeskind DS; Coull BM; Krupinski EA; Villablanca JP
    Stroke; 2013 Nov; 44(11):3090-6. PubMed ID: 23988646
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. High Intravascular Signal Arterial Transit Time Artifacts Have Negligible Effects on Cerebral Blood Flow and Cerebrovascular Reserve Capacity Measurement Using Single Postlabel Delay Arterial Spin-Labeling in Patients with Moyamoya Disease.
    Fahlström M; Lewén A; Enblad P; Larsson EM; Wikström J
    AJNR Am J Neuroradiol; 2020 Mar; 41(3):430-436. PubMed ID: 32115416
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Correction for Susceptibility Distortions Increases the Performance of Arterial Spin Labeling in Patients with Cerebrovascular Disease.
    Madai VI; Martin SZ; von Samson-Himmelstjerna FC; Herzig CX; Mutke MA; Wood CN; Thamm T; Zweynert S; Bauer M; Hetzer S; Günther M; Sobesky J
    J Neuroimaging; 2016 Jul; 26(4):436-44. PubMed ID: 26902457
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. MR Imaging of Individual Perfusion Reorganization Using Superselective Pseudocontinuous Arterial Spin-Labeling in Patients with Complex Extracranial Steno-Occlusive Disease.
    Richter V; Helle M; van Osch MJ; Lindner T; Gersing AS; Tsantilas P; Eckstein HH; Preibisch C; Zimmer C
    AJNR Am J Neuroradiol; 2017 Apr; 38(4):703-711. PubMed ID: 28183839
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. A linear mixed perfusion model for tissue partial volume correction of perfusion estimates in dynamic susceptibility contrast MRI: Impact on absolute quantification, repeatability, and agreement with pseudo-continuous arterial spin labeling.
    Ahlgren A; Wirestam R; Lind E; Ståhlberg F; Knutsson L
    Magn Reson Med; 2017 Jun; 77(6):2203-2214. PubMed ID: 27321696
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 14.