291 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 31974689)
1. Comparison of propagation-based CT using synchrotron radiation and conventional cone-beam CT for breast imaging.
Tavakoli Taba S; Baran P; Nesterets YI; Pacile S; Wienbeck S; Dullin C; Pavlov K; Maksimenko A; Lockie D; Mayo SC; Quiney HM; Dreossi D; Arfelli F; Tromba G; Lewis S; Gureyev TE; Brennan PC
Eur Radiol; 2020 May; 30(5):2740-2750. PubMed ID: 31974689
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Pre- and post-contrast versus post-contrast cone-beam breast CT: can we reduce radiation exposure while maintaining diagnostic accuracy?
Uhlig J; Fischer U; Biggemann L; Lotz J; Wienbeck S
Eur Radiol; 2019 Jun; 29(6):3141-3148. PubMed ID: 30488110
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Cone-beam CT for breast imaging: Radiation dose, breast coverage, and image quality.
O'Connell A; Conover DL; Zhang Y; Seifert P; Logan-Young W; Lin CF; Sahler L; Ning R
AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2010 Aug; 195(2):496-509. PubMed ID: 20651210
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. The role of cone-beam breast-CT for breast cancer detection relative to breast density.
Wienbeck S; Uhlig J; Luftner-Nagel S; Zapf A; Surov A; von Fintel E; Stahnke V; Lotz J; Fischer U
Eur Radiol; 2017 Dec; 27(12):5185-5195. PubMed ID: 28677053
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Propagation-Based Phase-Contrast CT of the Breast Demonstrates Higher Quality Than Conventional Absorption-Based CT Even at Lower Radiation Dose.
Tavakoli Taba S; Arhatari BD; Nesterets YI; Gadomkar Z; Mayo SC; Thompson D; Fox J; Kumar B; Prodanovic Z; Hausermann D; Maksimenko A; Hall C; Dimmock M; Pavlov KM; Lockie D; Gity M; Peele A; Quiney HM; Lewis S; Gureyev TE; Brennan PC
Acad Radiol; 2021 Jan; 28(1):e20-e26. PubMed ID: 32035759
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Propagation-based x-ray phase-contrast tomography of mastectomy samples using synchrotron radiation.
Gureyev TE; Nesterets YI; Baran PM; Taba ST; Mayo SC; Thompson D; Arhatari B; Mihocic A; Abbey B; Lockie D; Fox J; Kumar B; Prodanovic Z; Hausermann D; Maksimenko A; Hall C; Peele AG; Dimmock M; Pavlov KM; Cholewa M; Lewis S; Tromba G; Quiney HM; Brennan PC
Med Phys; 2019 Dec; 46(12):5478-5487. PubMed ID: 31574166
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Contrast-enhanced cone-beam breast-CT (CBBCT): clinical performance compared to mammography and MRI.
Wienbeck S; Fischer U; Luftner-Nagel S; Lotz J; Uhlig J
Eur Radiol; 2018 Sep; 28(9):3731-3741. PubMed ID: 29594402
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. A Reliability Comparison of Cone-Beam Breast Computed Tomography and Mammography: Breast Density Assessment Referring to the Fifth Edition of the BI-RADS Atlas.
Ma Y; Cao Y; Liu A; Yin L; Han P; Li H; Zhang X; Ye Z
Acad Radiol; 2019 Jun; 26(6):752-759. PubMed ID: 30220584
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Comparison of background parenchymal enhancement (BPE) on contrast-enhanced cone-beam breast CT (CE-CBBCT) and breast MRI.
Ma Y; Liu A; Zhang Y; Zhu Y; Wang Y; Zhao M; Liang Z; Qu Z; Yin L; Lu H; Ye Z
Eur Radiol; 2022 Aug; 32(8):5773-5782. PubMed ID: 35320411
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Cone beam breast CT with multiplanar and three dimensional visualization in differentiating breast masses compared with mammography.
Zhao B; Zhang X; Cai W; Conover D; Ning R
Eur J Radiol; 2015 Jan; 84(1):48-53. PubMed ID: 25439008
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Free propagation phase-contrast breast CT provides higher image quality than cone-beam breast-CT at low radiation doses: a feasibility study on human mastectomies.
Pacilè S; Dullin C; Baran P; Tonutti M; Perske C; Fischer U; Albers J; Arfelli F; Dreossi D; Pavlov K; Maksimenko A; Mayo SC; Nesterets YI; Taba ST; Lewis S; Brennan PC; Gureyev TE; Tromba G; Wienbeck S
Sci Rep; 2019 Sep; 9(1):13762. PubMed ID: 31551475
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Comparison between cone-beam breast-CT and full-field digital mammography for microcalcification detection depending on breast density.
Wienbeck S; Andrijevska V; Kück F; Perske C; Unterberg-Buchwald C; Fischer U; Lotz J; Kunze M
Medicine (Baltimore); 2023 Jun; 102(22):e33900. PubMed ID: 37266644
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Imaging lobular breast carcinoma: comparison of synchrotron radiation DEI-CT technique with clinical CT, mammography and histology.
Fiedler S; Bravin A; Keyriläinen J; Fernández M; Suortti P; Thomlinson W; Tenhunen M; Virkkunen P; Karjalainen-Lindsberg M
Phys Med Biol; 2004 Jan; 49(2):175-88. PubMed ID: 15083665
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Cone-beam breast CT features associated with HER2/neu overexpression in patients with primary breast cancer.
Zhu Y; Zhang Y; Ma Y; Li H; Liu A; Han P; Yin L; Lv N; Li Z; Lu H; Liu P; Ye Z
Eur Radiol; 2020 May; 30(5):2731-2739. PubMed ID: 31900700
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Dedicated Cone-beam Breast Computed Tomography and Diagnostic Mammography: Comparison of Radiation Dose, Patient Comfort, And Qualitative Review of Imaging Findings in BI-RADS 4 and 5 Lesions.
O'Connell AM; Kawakyu-O'Connor D
J Clin Imaging Sci; 2012; 2():7. PubMed ID: 22439131
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Dedicated cone-beam breast CT: Data acquisition strategies based on projection angle-dependent normalized glandular dose coefficients.
Tseng HW; Karellas A; Vedantham S
Med Phys; 2023 Mar; 50(3):1406-1417. PubMed ID: 36427332
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Radiation doses in cone-beam breast computed tomography: a Monte Carlo simulation study.
Yi Y; Lai CJ; Han T; Zhong Y; Shen Y; Liu X; Ge S; You Z; Wang T; Shaw CC
Med Phys; 2011 Feb; 38(2):589-97. PubMed ID: 21452696
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Comparison of comfort between cone beam breast computed tomography and digital mammography.
Li H; Yin L; He N; Han P; Zhu Y; Ma Y; Liu A; Lu H; Gao Z; Liu P; Wu Y; Ye Z
Eur J Radiol; 2019 Nov; 120():108674. PubMed ID: 31557718
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Advantages of breast cancer visualization and characterization using synchrotron radiation phase-contrast tomography.
Pacilè S; Baran P; Dullin C; Dimmock M; Lockie D; Missbach-Guntner J; Quiney H; McCormack M; Mayo S; Thompson D; Nesterets Y; Hall C; Pavlov K; Prodanovic Z; Tonutti M; Accardo A; Fox J; Tavakoli Taba S; Lewis S; Brennan P; Hausermann D; Tromba G; Gureyev T
J Synchrotron Radiat; 2018 Sep; 25(Pt 5):1460-1466. PubMed ID: 30179186
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Cone-beam breast computed tomography with a displaced flat panel detector array.
Mettivier G; Russo P; Lanconelli N; Meo SL
Med Phys; 2012 May; 39(5):2805-19. PubMed ID: 22559652
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
