These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

468 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 31975175)

  • 1. Population Genomics on the Fly: Recent Advances in Drosophila.
    Haudry A; Laurent S; Kapun M
    Methods Mol Biol; 2020; 2090():357-396. PubMed ID: 31975175
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Detection of hard and soft selective sweeps from Drosophila melanogaster population genomic data.
    Garud NR; Messer PW; Petrov DA
    PLoS Genet; 2021 Feb; 17(2):e1009373. PubMed ID: 33635910
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Recent selective sweeps in North American Drosophila melanogaster show signatures of soft sweeps.
    Garud NR; Messer PW; Buzbas EO; Petrov DA
    PLoS Genet; 2015 Feb; 11(2):e1005004. PubMed ID: 25706129
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. The adaptive significance of chromosomal inversion polymorphisms in Drosophila melanogaster.
    Kapun M; Flatt T
    Mol Ecol; 2019 Mar; 28(6):1263-1282. PubMed ID: 30230076
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Multiple Modes of Positive Selection Shaping the Patterns of Incomplete Selective Sweeps over African Populations of Drosophila melanogaster.
    Vy HMT; Won YJ; Kim Y
    Mol Biol Evol; 2017 Nov; 34(11):2792-2807. PubMed ID: 28981697
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Elevated Linkage Disequilibrium and Signatures of Soft Sweeps Are Common in Drosophila melanogaster.
    Garud NR; Petrov DA
    Genetics; 2016 Jun; 203(2):863-80. PubMed ID: 27098909
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Deep Learning for Population Genetic Inference.
    Sheehan S; Song YS
    PLoS Comput Biol; 2016 Mar; 12(3):e1004845. PubMed ID: 27018908
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Biases in ARG-Based Inference of Historical Population Size in Populations Experiencing Selection.
    Marsh JI; Johri P
    Mol Biol Evol; 2024 Jul; 41(7):. PubMed ID: 38874402
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Genomic Analysis of European Drosophila melanogaster Populations Reveals Longitudinal Structure, Continent-Wide Selection, and Previously Unknown DNA Viruses.
    Kapun M; Barrón MG; Staubach F; Obbard DJ; Wiberg RAW; Vieira J; Goubert C; Rota-Stabelli O; Kankare M; Bogaerts-Márquez M; Haudry A; Waidele L; Kozeretska I; Pasyukova EG; Loeschcke V; Pascual M; Vieira CP; Serga S; Montchamp-Moreau C; Abbott J; Gibert P; Porcelli D; Posnien N; Sánchez-Gracia A; Grath S; Sucena É; Bergland AO; Guerreiro MPG; Onder BS; Argyridou E; Guio L; Schou MF; Deplancke B; Vieira C; Ritchie MG; Zwaan BJ; Tauber E; Orengo DJ; Puerma E; Aguadé M; Schmidt P; Parsch J; Betancourt AJ; Flatt T; González J
    Mol Biol Evol; 2020 Sep; 37(9):2661-2678. PubMed ID: 32413142
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. The Effects on Neutral Variability of Recurrent Selective Sweeps and Background Selection.
    Campos JL; Charlesworth B
    Genetics; 2019 May; 212(1):287-303. PubMed ID: 30923166
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Genomic Evidence for Adaptive Inversion Clines in Drosophila melanogaster.
    Kapun M; Fabian DK; Goudet J; Flatt T
    Mol Biol Evol; 2016 May; 33(5):1317-36. PubMed ID: 26796550
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Genome-wide patterns of local adaptation in Western European Drosophila melanogaster natural populations.
    Mateo L; Rech GE; González J
    Sci Rep; 2018 Nov; 8(1):16143. PubMed ID: 30385770
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Rapid genomic changes in Drosophila melanogaster adapting to desiccation stress in an experimental evolution system.
    Kang L; Aggarwal DD; Rashkovetsky E; Korol AB; Michalak P
    BMC Genomics; 2016 Mar; 17():233. PubMed ID: 26979755
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Comparative population genomics of latitudinal variation in Drosophila simulans and Drosophila melanogaster.
    Machado HE; Bergland AO; O'Brien KR; Behrman EL; Schmidt PS; Petrov DA
    Mol Ecol; 2016 Feb; 25(3):723-40. PubMed ID: 26523848
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Genomics of Parallel Experimental Evolution in Drosophila.
    Graves JL; Hertweck KL; Phillips MA; Han MV; Cabral LG; Barter TT; Greer LF; Burke MK; Mueller LD; Rose MR
    Mol Biol Evol; 2017 Apr; 34(4):831-842. PubMed ID: 28087779
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Background selection as null hypothesis in population genomics: insights and challenges from
    Comeron JM
    Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci; 2017 Dec; 372(1736):. PubMed ID: 29109230
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Molecular Population Genetics.
    Casillas S; Barbadilla A
    Genetics; 2017 Mar; 205(3):1003-1035. PubMed ID: 28270526
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Genomic analysis of adaptive differentiation in Drosophila melanogaster.
    Turner TL; Levine MT; Eckert ML; Begun DJ
    Genetics; 2008 May; 179(1):455-73. PubMed ID: 18493064
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. A Large Panel of Drosophila simulans Reveals an Abundance of Common Variants.
    Signor SA; New FN; Nuzhdin S
    Genome Biol Evol; 2018 Jan; 10(1):189-206. PubMed ID: 29228179
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. The recent demographic and adaptive history of Drosophila melanogaster.
    Stephan W; Li H
    Heredity (Edinb); 2007 Feb; 98(2):65-8. PubMed ID: 17006533
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 24.