These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

204 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 31976419)

  • 41. "Replicability and other features of a high-quality science: Toward a balanced and empirical approach": Correction to Finkel et al. (2017).
    J Pers Soc Psychol; 2017 Nov; 113(5):768. PubMed ID: 29016166
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 42. Open science practices for eating disorders research.
    Burke NL; Frank GKW; Hilbert A; Hildebrandt T; Klump KL; Thomas JJ; Wade TD; Walsh BT; Wang SB; Weissman RS
    Int J Eat Disord; 2021 Oct; 54(10):1719-1729. PubMed ID: 34555191
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 43. Open and reproducible science practices in psychoneuroendocrinology: Opportunities to foster scientific progress.
    Meier M; Lonsdorf TB; Lupien SJ; Stalder T; Laufer S; Sicorello M; Linz R; Puhlmann LMC
    Compr Psychoneuroendocrinol; 2022 Aug; 11():100144. PubMed ID: 35757179
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 44. Toward Open and Reproducible Epidemiology.
    Mathur MB; Fox MP
    Am J Epidemiol; 2023 Apr; 192(4):658-664. PubMed ID: 36627249
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 45. Introduction to the special section on increasing replicability, transparency, and openness in clinical psychology.
    Tackett JL; Miller JD
    J Abnorm Psychol; 2019 Aug; 128(6):487-492. PubMed ID: 31368726
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 46. Improving transparency and scientific rigor in academic publishing.
    Prager EM; Chambers KE; Plotkin JL; McArthur DL; Bandrowski AE; Bansal N; Martone ME; Bergstrom HC; Bespalov A; Graf C
    J Neurosci Res; 2019 Apr; 97(4):377-390. PubMed ID: 30506706
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 47. Principles of open, transparent and reproducible science in author guidelines of sleep research and chronobiology journals.
    Spitschan M; Schmidt MH; Blume C
    Wellcome Open Res; 2020; 5():172. PubMed ID: 33748432
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 48. Seven steps to enhance Open Science practices in animal science.
    Muñoz-Tamayo R; Nielsen BL; Gagaoua M; Gondret F; Krause ET; Morgavi DP; Olsson IAS; Pastell M; Taghipoor M; Tedeschi L; Veissier I; Nawroth C
    PNAS Nexus; 2022 Jul; 1(3):pgac106. PubMed ID: 36741429
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 49. Open Science Badges in the Journal of Neurochemistry.
    Schweitzer B; Schulz JB
    J Neurochem; 2018 Oct; 147(2):132-136. PubMed ID: 30069885
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 50. Open Science Practices in Gambling Research Publications (2016-2019): A Scoping Review.
    Louderback ER; Gainsbury SM; Heirene RM; Amichia K; Grossman A; Bernhard BJ; LaPlante DA
    J Gambl Stud; 2023 Jun; 39(2):987-1011. PubMed ID: 35678905
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 51. Adapting Open Science and Pre-registration to Longitudinal Research.
    Petersen IT; Apfelbaum KS; McMurray B
    Infant Child Dev; 2024; 33(1):. PubMed ID: 38425545
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 52. Rewarding Replications: A Sure and Simple Way to Improve Psychological Science.
    Koole SL; Lakens D
    Perspect Psychol Sci; 2012 Nov; 7(6):608-14. PubMed ID: 26168120
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 53. Cardiology researchers' practices and perceived barriers to open science: an international survey.
    Cobey KD; Alayche M; Saba S; Barnes NY; Ebrahimzadeh S; Alarcón E; Hibbert B; Moher D
    Open Heart; 2024 Jan; 11(1):. PubMed ID: 38233041
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 54. PSYCHOLOGY. Estimating the reproducibility of psychological science.
    Open Science Collaboration
    Science; 2015 Aug; 349(6251):aac4716. PubMed ID: 26315443
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 55. Replicability, Robustness, and Reproducibility in Psychological Science.
    Nosek BA; Hardwicke TE; Moshontz H; Allard A; Corker KS; Dreber A; Fidler F; Hilgard J; Kline Struhl M; Nuijten MB; Rohrer JM; Romero F; Scheel AM; Scherer LD; Schönbrodt FD; Vazire S
    Annu Rev Psychol; 2022 Jan; 73():719-748. PubMed ID: 34665669
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 56. Psychology, Science, and Knowledge Construction: Broadening Perspectives from the Replication Crisis.
    Shrout PE; Rodgers JL
    Annu Rev Psychol; 2018 Jan; 69():487-510. PubMed ID: 29300688
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 57. Psychologists Are Open to Change, yet Wary of Rules.
    Fuchs HM; Jenny M; Fiedler S
    Perspect Psychol Sci; 2012 Nov; 7(6):639-42. PubMed ID: 26168123
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 58. Replications in Psychology Research: How Often Do They Really Occur?
    Makel MC; Plucker JA; Hegarty B
    Perspect Psychol Sci; 2012 Nov; 7(6):537-42. PubMed ID: 26168110
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 59. "Health Psychology adopts Transparency and Openness Promotion (TOP) Guidelines": Correction to Freedland (2021).
    Health Psychol; 2021 Jul; 40(7):vi. PubMed ID: 34435792
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 60. Internal conceptual replications do not increase independent replication success.
    Kunert R
    Psychon Bull Rev; 2016 Oct; 23(5):1631-1638. PubMed ID: 27068542
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 11.