182 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 31976558)
21. Long-term oncologic outcomes of robotic low anterior resection for rectal cancer: a comparative study with laparoscopic surgery.
Park EJ; Cho MS; Baek SJ; Hur H; Min BS; Baik SH; Lee KY; Kim NK
Ann Surg; 2015 Jan; 261(1):129-37. PubMed ID: 24662411
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Laparoscopic Versus Robotic Proctectomy Outcomes: An ACS-NSQIP Analysis.
Hu KY; Wu R; Szabo A; Ridolfi TJ; Ludwig KA; Peterson CY
J Surg Res; 2020 Nov; 255():495-501. PubMed ID: 32622164
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Robotic vs laparoscopic rectal surgery in high-risk patients.
Ahmed J; Cao H; Panteleimonitis S; Khan J; Parvaiz A
Colorectal Dis; 2017 Dec; 19(12):1092-1099. PubMed ID: 28644545
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Preoperative prediction of conversion from laparoscopic rectal resection to open surgery: a clinical study of conversion scoring of laparoscopic rectal resection to open surgery.
Zhang GD; Zhi XT; Zhang JL; Bu GB; Ma G; Wang KL
Int J Colorectal Dis; 2015 Sep; 30(9):1209-16. PubMed ID: 26077668
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. [Risk factors of coloanal anastomotic stricture after laparoscopic intersphincteric resection for low rectal cancer].
Zhang B; Zhuo GZ; Tian L; Zhao K; Zhao Y; Zhao YJ; Zhu J; Zhang T; Ding JH
Zhonghua Wei Chang Wai Ke Za Zhi; 2019 Aug; 22(8):755-761. PubMed ID: 31422614
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
26. Laparoscopic vs. robotic rectal cancer surgery and the effect on conversion rates: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials and propensity-score-matched studies.
Phan K; Kahlaee HR; Kim SH; Toh JWT
Tech Coloproctol; 2019 Mar; 23(3):221-230. PubMed ID: 30623315
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Robotic Low Anterior Resection for Rectal Cancer: A National Perspective on Short-term Oncologic Outcomes.
Speicher PJ; Englum BR; Ganapathi AM; Nussbaum DP; Mantyh CR; Migaly J
Ann Surg; 2015 Dec; 262(6):1040-5. PubMed ID: 25405559
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Impact of surgical approach on short-term oncological outcomes and recovery following low anterior resection for rectal cancer.
Hyde LZ; Baser O; Mehendale S; Guo D; Shah M; Kiran RP
Colorectal Dis; 2019 Aug; 21(8):932-942. PubMed ID: 31062521
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Assessing the role of robotic proctectomy in obese patients: a contemporary NSQIP analysis.
Glencer AC; Lin JA; Trang K; Greenberg A; Kirkwood KS; Adam MA; Sarin A
J Robot Surg; 2022 Dec; 16(6):1391-1399. PubMed ID: 35147841
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Incidence, associated risk factors, and impact of conversion to laparotomy in elective minimally invasive sigmoidectomy for diverticular disease.
Bastawrous AL; Landmann RG; Liu Y; Liu E; Cleary RK
Surg Endosc; 2020 Feb; 34(2):598-609. PubMed ID: 31062152
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Exploring and adjusting for potential learning effects in ROLARR: a randomised controlled trial comparing robotic-assisted vs. standard laparoscopic surgery for rectal cancer resection.
Corrigan N; Marshall H; Croft J; Copeland J; Jayne D; Brown J
Trials; 2018 Jun; 19(1):339. PubMed ID: 29945673
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. The effect of obesity on laparoscopic and robotic-assisted colorectal surgery outcomes: an ACS-NSQIP database analysis.
Harr JN; Haskins IN; Amdur RL; Agarwal S; Obias V
J Robot Surg; 2018 Jun; 12(2):317-323. PubMed ID: 28900886
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Robotic Surgery for Rectal Cancer Provides Advantageous Outcomes Over Laparoscopic Approach: Results From a Large Retrospective Cohort.
Crippa J; Grass F; Dozois EJ; Mathis KL; Merchea A; Colibaseanu DT; Kelley SR; Larson DW
Ann Surg; 2021 Dec; 274(6):e1218-e1222. PubMed ID: 32068552
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Trends in utilization, conversion rates, and outcomes for minimally invasive approaches to non-metastatic rectal cancer: a national cancer database analysis.
Parascandola SA; Hota S; Sparks AD; Boulos S; Cavallo K; Kim G; Obias V
Surg Endosc; 2021 Jun; 35(6):3154-3165. PubMed ID: 32601761
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Comparing incidence of enterocolitis after laparoscopic and open low anterior resection for stage II/III rectal cancer.
Inomata M; Kusano T; Etoh T; Akagi T; Shibata T; Ueda Y; Tojigamori M; Shiroshita H; Noguchi T; Shiraishi N; Kitano S
Asian J Endosc Surg; 2014 Aug; 7(3):214-21. PubMed ID: 24690093
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Robotic-assisted laparoscopic versus open lateral lymph node dissection for advanced lower rectal cancer.
Yamaguchi T; Kinugasa Y; Shiomi A; Tomioka H; Kagawa H
Surg Endosc; 2016 Feb; 30(2):721-728. PubMed ID: 26092002
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Oncologic and Clinicopathologic Outcomes of Robot-Assisted Total Mesorectal Excision for Rectal Cancer.
Pai A; Marecik SJ; Park JJ; Melich G; Sulo S; Prasad LM
Dis Colon Rectum; 2015 Jul; 58(7):659-67. PubMed ID: 26200680
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. [Efficacy comparison between robot-assisted and laparoscopic surgery for mid-low rectal cancer: a prospective randomized controlled trial].
Tang B; Gao GM; Zou Z; Liu DN; Tang C; Jiang QG; Lei X; Li TY
Zhonghua Wei Chang Wai Ke Za Zhi; 2020 Apr; 23(4):377-383. PubMed ID: 32306606
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
39. The circumferential resection margins status: A comparison of robotic, laparoscopic and open total mesorectal excision for mid and low rectal cancer.
de Jesus JP; Valadão M; de Castro Araujo RO; Cesar D; Linhares E; Iglesias AC
Eur J Surg Oncol; 2016 Jun; 42(6):808-12. PubMed ID: 27038996
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Outcomes following laparoscopic rectal cancer resection by supervised trainees.
Currie AC; White I; Malietzis G; Moorghen M; Jenkins JT; Kennedy RH
Br J Surg; 2016 Jul; 103(8):1076-83. PubMed ID: 27168231
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
