These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

123 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 31976569)

  • 1. 1.5 T magnetic resonance imaging generates accurate 3D proximal femoral models: Surgical planning implications for femoroacetabular impingement.
    Malloy P; Gasienica J; Dawe R; Espinoza Orías AA; Nwachukwu BU; Inoue N; Yanke AB; Nho SJ
    J Orthop Res; 2020 Sep; 38(9):2050-2056. PubMed ID: 31976569
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Patient-Specific 3-D Magnetic Resonance Imaging-Based Dynamic Simulation of Hip Impingement and Range of Motion Can Replace 3-D Computed Tomography-Based Simulation for Patients With Femoroacetabular Impingement: Implications for Planning Open Hip Preservation Surgery and Hip Arthroscopy.
    Lerch TD; Degonda C; Schmaranzer F; Todorski I; Cullmann-Bastian J; Zheng G; Siebenrock KA; Tannast M
    Am J Sports Med; 2019 Oct; 47(12):2966-2977. PubMed ID: 31486679
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. 3.0T magnetic resonance imaging-based hip bone models for femoroacetabular impingement syndrome are equivalent to computed tomography-based models.
    Newhouse AC; Alter TD; Handoklow LA; Espinoza Orías AA; Inoue N; Nho SJ
    J Orthop Res; 2024 Sep; 42(9):2017-2025. PubMed ID: 38564320
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. MRI-- and CT--based metrics for the quantification of arthroscopic bone resections in femoroacetabular impingement syndrome.
    Guidetti M; Malloy P; Alter TD; Newhouse AC; Espinoza Orías AA; Inoue N; Nho SJ
    J Orthop Res; 2022 May; 40(5):1174-1181. PubMed ID: 34192370
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Which Two-dimensional Radiographic Measurements of Cam Femoroacetabular Impingement Best Describe the Three-dimensional Shape of the Proximal Femur?
    Atkins PR; Shin Y; Agrawal P; Elhabian SY; Whitaker RT; Weiss JA; Aoki SK; Peters CL; Anderson AE
    Clin Orthop Relat Res; 2019 Jan; 477(1):242-253. PubMed ID: 30179924
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Segmentation of the proximal femur in radial MR scans using a random forest classifier and deformable model registration.
    Damopoulos D; Lerch TD; Schmaranzer F; Tannast M; Chênes C; Zheng G; Schmid J
    Int J Comput Assist Radiol Surg; 2019 Mar; 14(3):545-561. PubMed ID: 30604143
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Interchangeability of CT and 3D "pseudo-CT" MRI for preoperative planning in patients with femoroacetabular impingement.
    Guirguis A; Polster J; Karim W; Obuchowski N; Rosneck J; Goodwin R; Subhas N
    Skeletal Radiol; 2020 Jul; 49(7):1073-1080. PubMed ID: 31996983
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Intraoperative Fluoroscopic Imaging to Treat Cam Deformities: Correlation With 3-Dimensional Computed Tomography.
    Ross JR; Bedi A; Stone RM; Sibilsky Enselman E; Leunig M; Kelly BT; Larson CM
    Am J Sports Med; 2014 Jun; 42(6):1370-6. PubMed ID: 24737661
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. 3D-MRI versus 3D-CT in the evaluation of osseous anatomy in femoroacetabular impingement using Dixon 3D FLASH sequence.
    Samim M; Eftekhary N; Vigdorchik JM; Elbuluk A; Davidovitch R; Youm T; Gyftopoulos S
    Skeletal Radiol; 2019 Mar; 48(3):429-436. PubMed ID: 30182297
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Femoroacetabular Impingement Patients With Decreased Femoral Version Have Different Impingement Locations and Intra- and Extraarticular Anterior Subspine FAI on 3D-CT-Based Impingement Simulation: Implications for Hip Arthroscopy.
    Lerch TD; Boschung A; Todorski IAS; Steppacher SD; Schmaranzer F; Zheng G; Ryan MK; Siebenrock KA; Tannast M
    Am J Sports Med; 2019 Nov; 47(13):3120-3132. PubMed ID: 31539275
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Noninvasive shape-fitting method quantifies cam morphology in femoroacetabular impingement syndrome: Implications for diagnosis and surgical planning.
    Guidetti M; Malloy P; Alter TD; Newhouse AC; Nho SJ; Espinoza Orías AA
    J Orthop Res; 2023 Jun; 41(6):1256-1265. PubMed ID: 36227086
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Combining femoral and acetabular parameters in femoroacetabular impingement: the omega surface.
    Bouma H; Hogervorst T; Audenaert E; van Kampen P
    Med Biol Eng Comput; 2015 Nov; 53(11):1239-46. PubMed ID: 26446831
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Location of Intra- and Extra-articular Hip Impingement Is Different in Patients With Pincer-Type and Mixed-Type Femoroacetabular Impingement Due to Acetabular Retroversion or Protrusio Acetabuli on 3D CT-Based Impingement Simulation.
    Lerch TD; Siegfried M; Schmaranzer F; Leibold CS; Zurmühle CA; Hanke MS; Ryan MK; Steppacher SD; Siebenrock KA; Tannast M
    Am J Sports Med; 2020 Mar; 48(3):661-672. PubMed ID: 31961701
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Sex Differences in Patients With CAM Deformities With Femoroacetabular Impingement: 3-Dimensional Computed Tomographic Quantification.
    Yanke AB; Khair MM; Stanley R; Walton D; Lee S; Bush-Joseph CA; Espinoza Orías A; Inoue N; Nho SJ
    Arthroscopy; 2015 Dec; 31(12):2301-6. PubMed ID: 26219994
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Prevalence and diagnostic accuracy of in-toeing and out-toeing of the foot for patients with abnormal femoral torsion and femoroacetabular impingement: implications for hip arthroscopy and femoral derotation osteotomy.
    Lerch TD; Eichelberger P; Baur H; Schmaranzer F; Liechti EF; Schwab JM; Siebenrock KA; Tannast M
    Bone Joint J; 2019 Oct; 101-B(10):1218-1229. PubMed ID: 31564157
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Consistency of 3D femoral torsion measurement from MRI compared to CT gold standard.
    Häller TV; Schenk P; Jud L; Hoch A; Götschi T; Zingg PO
    BMC Musculoskelet Disord; 2021 Aug; 22(1):739. PubMed ID: 34454445
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Measurement of Femoral Version by MRI is as Reliable and Reproducible as CT in Children and Adolescents With Hip Disorders.
    Hesham K; Carry PM; Freese K; Kestel L; Stewart JR; Delavan JA; Novais EN
    J Pediatr Orthop; 2017 Dec; 37(8):557-562. PubMed ID: 28323254
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Evaluation of Osseous Morphology of the Hip Using Zero Echo Time Magnetic Resonance Imaging.
    Breighner RE; Bogner EA; Lee SC; Koff MF; Potter HG
    Am J Sports Med; 2019 Dec; 47(14):3460-3468. PubMed ID: 31633993
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. A quantitative non-invasive assessment of femoroacetabular impingement with CT-based dynamic simulation--cadaveric validation study.
    Röling MA; Visser MI; Oei EH; Pilot P; Kleinrensink GJ; Bloem RM
    BMC Musculoskelet Disord; 2015 Mar; 16():50. PubMed ID: 25879668
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Preoperative Use of a 3D Printed Model for Femoroacetabular Impingement Surgery and Its Effect on Planned Osteoplasty.
    Wong TT; Lynch TS; Popkin CA; Kazam JK
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2018 Aug; 211(2):W116-W121. PubMed ID: 29873507
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.