These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

111 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 31977169)

  • 1. Corrigendum: Individual external dose monitoring of all citizens of Date City by passive dosimeter 5–51 months after the Fukushima NPP Accident (series): I. Comparison of individual dose with ambient dose rate monitored by aircraft surveys (2016 J. Radiat. Prot. 37 1).
    Miyazaki M; Hayano R
    J Radiol Prot; 2017 Mar; 37(1):320. PubMed ID: 31977169
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Publisher's Note on: 'Individual external dose monitoring of all citizens of Date City by passive dosimeter 5 to 51 months after the Fukushima NPP accident (series): I. Comparison of individual dose with ambient dose rate monitored by aircraft surveys' (2017 J. Radiol. Prot. 37 1) and 'Individual external dose monitoring of all citizens of Date City by passive dosimeter 5 to 51 months after the Fukushima NPP accident (series): II. Prediction of lifetime additional effective dose and evaluating the effect of decontamination on individual dose' (2017 J. Radiol. Prot. 37 623).
    J Radiol Prot; 2020 Sep; 40(3):E19-E23. PubMed ID: 32901613
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Retraction: Individual external dose monitoring of all citizens of Date City by passive dosimeter 5 to 51 months after the Fukushima NPP accident (series): 1. Comparison of individual dose with ambient dose rate monitored by aircraft surveys (2017
    J Radiol Prot; 2020 Jul; 40(3):. PubMed ID: 34987134
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Individual external dose monitoring of all citizens of Date City by passive dosimeter 5 to 51 months after the Fukushima NPP accident (series): 1. Comparison of individual dose with ambient dose rate monitored by aircraft surveys.
    Miyazaki M; Hayano R
    J Radiol Prot; 2017 Mar; 37(1):1-12. PubMed ID: 27922832
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Retraction: Individual external dose monitoring of all citizens of Date City by passive dosimeter 5 to 51 months after the Fukushima NPP accident (series): II. Prediction of lifetime additional effective dose and evaluating the effect of decontamination on individual dose (2017
    J Radiol Prot; 2020 Jul; 40(3):. PubMed ID: 34009139
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Individual external dose monitoring of all citizens of Date City by passive dosimeter 5 to 51 months after the Fukushima NPP accident (series): II. Prediction of lifetime additional effective dose and evaluating the effect of decontamination on individual dose.
    Miyazaki M; Hayano R
    J Radiol Prot; 2017 Sep; 37(3):623-634. PubMed ID: 28682791
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Estimating Annual Individual Doses for Evacuees Returning Home to Areas Affected by the Fukushima Nuclear Accident.
    Yajima K; Kurihara O; Ohmachi Y; Takada M; Omori Y; Akahane K; Kim E; Torikoshi M; Yonehara H; Yoshida S; Sakai K; Akashi M
    Health Phys; 2015 Aug; 109(2):122-33. PubMed ID: 26107433
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Relationship between Individual External Doses, Ambient Dose Rates and Individuals' Activity-Patterns in Affected Areas in Fukushima following the Fukushima Daiichi Nuclear Power Plant Accident.
    Naito W; Uesaka M; Yamada C; Kurosawa T; Yasutaka T; Ishii H
    PLoS One; 2016; 11(8):e0158879. PubMed ID: 27494021
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Comparison of external doses between radio-contaminated areas and areas with high natural terrestrial background using the individual dosimeter 'D-shuttle' 75 months after the Fukushima Daiichi nuclear power plant accident.
    Tsubokura M; Nomura S; Yoshida I; Sawano T; Miyazaki M; Tomita S; Tomoyoshi O; Watanabe M
    J Radiol Prot; 2018 Mar; 38(1):273-285. PubMed ID: 29235452
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Measures against increased environmental radiation dose by the TEPCO Fukushima Dai-ichi NPP accident in some local governments in the Tokyo metropolitan area: focusing on examples of both Kashiwa and Nagareyama cities in Chiba prefecture.
    Iimoto T; Fujii H; Oda S; Nakamura T; Hayashi R; Kuroda R; Furusawa M; Umekage T; Ohkubo Y
    Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2012 Nov; 152(1-3):210-4. PubMed ID: 22927655
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Estimated dietary intake of radionuclides and health risks for the citizens of Fukushima City, Tokyo, and Osaka after the 2011 nuclear accident.
    Murakami M; Oki T
    PLoS One; 2014; 9(11):e112791. PubMed ID: 25390339
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. A Probabilistic Approach to Assess External Doses to the Public Considering Spatial Variability of Radioactive Contamination and Interpopulation Differences in Behavior Pattern.
    Takahara S; Iijima M; Yoneda M; Shimada Y
    Risk Anal; 2019 Jan; 39(1):212-224. PubMed ID: 28884836
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. NIRS external dose estimation system for Fukushima residents after the Fukushima Dai-ichi NPP accident.
    Akahane K; Yonai S; Fukuda S; Miyahara N; Yasuda H; Iwaoka K; Matsumoto M; Fukumura A; Akashi M
    Sci Rep; 2013; 3():1670. PubMed ID: 23591638
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Temporal changes of the ambient dose rate in the forest environments of Fukushima Prefecture following the Fukushima reactor accident.
    Kato H; Onda Y; Yamaguchi T
    J Environ Radioact; 2019 Dec; 210():106058. PubMed ID: 31630855
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Dose calculations in aircrafts after Fukushima nuclear power plant accident - Preliminary study for aviation operations.
    Vargas A; Arnold D; Duch MA; Evangeliou N; Sievers K; Maurer C
    J Environ Radioact; 2019 Sep; 205-206():24-33. PubMed ID: 31096105
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Surveillance of Strontium-90 in Foods after the Fukushima Daiichi Nuclear Power Plant Accident.
    Nabeshi H; Tsutsumi T; Uekusa Y; Hachisuka A; Matsuda R; Teshima R
    Shokuhin Eiseigaku Zasshi; 2015; 56(4):133-43. PubMed ID: 26346857
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Temporal changes of the ambient dose rate in the forest environments of Fukushima Prefecture following the Fukushima reactor accident.
    Kato H; Onda Y; Yamaguchi T
    J Environ Radioact; 2018 Oct; 193-194():20-26. PubMed ID: 30179758
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Individual external doses below the lowest reference level of 1 mSv per year five years after the 2011 Fukushima nuclear accident among all children in Soma City, Fukushima: A retrospective observational study.
    Tsubokura M; Murakami M; Nomura S; Morita T; Nishikawa Y; Leppold C; Kato S; Kami M
    PLoS One; 2017; 12(2):e0172305. PubMed ID: 28235009
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Measuring and assessing individual external doses during the rehabilitation phase in Iitate village after the Fukushima Daiichi nuclear power plant accident.
    Naito W; Uesaka M; Kurosawa T; Kuroda Y
    J Radiol Prot; 2017 Sep; 37(3):606-622. PubMed ID: 28510538
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Corrigendum: Comparison of the UNSCEAR isodose maps for annual external exposure in Fukushima with those obtained based on airborne monitoring surveys (2018
    Hayano R; Miyazaki M
    J Radiol Prot; 2021 Feb; 41(1):. PubMed ID: 34812148
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.