212 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 31977266)
1. Cost of fear and radiation protection actions: Washington County, Utah and Fukushima, Japan {Comparing case histories}.
Church BW; Brooks AL
Int J Radiat Biol; 2020 Apr; 96(4):520-531. PubMed ID: 31977266
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. Radiological protection issues arising during and after the Fukushima nuclear reactor accident.
González AJ; Akashi M; Boice JD; Chino M; Homma T; Ishigure N; Kai M; Kusumi S; Lee JK; Menzel HG; Niwa O; Sakai K; Weiss W; Yamashita S; Yonekura Y
J Radiol Prot; 2013 Sep; 33(3):497-571. PubMed ID: 23803462
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Evacuation after a nuclear accident: Critical reviews of past nuclear accidents and proposal for future planning.
Ohba T; Tanigawa K; Liutsko L
Environ Int; 2021 Mar; 148():106379. PubMed ID: 33453652
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. [Comparative analysis of the radionuclide composition in fallout after the Chernobyl and the Fukushima accidents].
Kotenko KV; Shinkarev SM; Abramov IuV; Granovskaia EO; Iatsenko VN; Gavrilin IuI; Margulis UIa; Garetskaia OS; Imanaka T; Khoshi M
Med Tr Prom Ekol; 2012; (10):1-5. PubMed ID: 23210176
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Tenth Warren K. Sinclair keynote address-the Fukushima nuclear power plant accident and comprehensive health risk management.
Yamashita S
Health Phys; 2014 Feb; 106(2):166-80. PubMed ID: 24378490
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. What's better for our health? Conducting protective actions during a nuclear emergency or accepting a certain radiation dose?
Callen-Kovtunova J; McKenna T; Steinhauser G
J Radiol Prot; 2022 Mar; 42(2):. PubMed ID: 35263727
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Radiation protection issues on preparedness and response for a severe nuclear accident: experiences of the Fukushima accident.
Homma T; Takahara S; Kimura M; Kinase S
Ann ICRP; 2015 Jun; 44(1 Suppl):347-56. PubMed ID: 25915551
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Post-crisis efforts towards recovery and resilience after the Fukushima Daiichi Nuclear Power Plant accident.
Yamashita S; Takamura N
Jpn J Clin Oncol; 2015 Aug; 45(8):700-7. PubMed ID: 26059007
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Radiation Exposure and Thyroid Cancer Risk After the Fukushima Nuclear Power Plant Accident in Comparison with the Chernobyl Accident.
Yamashita S; Takamura N; Ohtsuru A; Suzuki S
Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2016 Sep; 171(1):41-6. PubMed ID: 27473699
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. The Fukushima nuclear disaster is ongoing.
Marks AR
J Clin Invest; 2016 Jul; 126(7):2385-7. PubMed ID: 27214552
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Establishment of the central radiation dose registration system for decontamination work involving radioactive fallout emitted by the Fukushima Daiichi APP accident.
Yasui S
J Occup Environ Hyg; 2016 Oct; 13(10):D166-74. PubMed ID: 27310266
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Emergency Response to Radiological Releases: Have We Communicated Effectively to the First Responder Communities to Prepare Them to Safely Manage These Incidents?
Ingram RJ
Health Phys; 2018 Feb; 114(2):208-213. PubMed ID: 30086017
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. New regulations for radiation protection for work involving radioactive fallout emitted by the TEPCO Fukushima Daiichi APP accident: application expansion to recovery and reconstruction work.
Yasui S
J Occup Environ Hyg; 2014; 11(8):D105-14. PubMed ID: 24593039
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Indication of the radioactive fallout in Riyadh, Saudi Arabia following the Fukushima nuclear accident.
Alkhomashi N; Almasoud FI
J Environ Radioact; 2016 Feb; 152():70-4. PubMed ID: 26650827
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. New regulations for radiation protection for work involving radioactive fallout emitted by the TEPCO Fukushima Daiichi APP accident--disposal of contaminated soil and wastes.
Yasui S
J Occup Environ Hyg; 2014; 11(10):D147-56. PubMed ID: 24856781
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Radioactive contamination monitoring for the Korean public following Fukushima nuclear accident.
Ha WH; Yoo J; Yoon S; Pak MJ; Park S; Kim MR; Lee SS
Appl Radiat Isot; 2013 Nov; 81():371-3. PubMed ID: 23541790
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Comparison of the Chernobyl and Fukushima nuclear accidents: a review of the environmental impacts.
Steinhauser G; Brandl A; Johnson TE
Sci Total Environ; 2014 Feb; 470-471():800-17. PubMed ID: 24189103
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Lessons Learned from the Accident at the Fukushima Dai-ichi Nuclear Power Plant-More than Basic Knowledge: Education and its Effects Improve the Preparedness and Response to Radiation Emergency.
Hachiya M; Akashi M
Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2016 Sep; 171(1):27-31. PubMed ID: 27466457
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. The Utah Thyroid Cohort Study: analysis of the dosimetry results.
Till JE; Simon SL; Kerber R; Lloyd RD; Stevens W; Thomas DC; Lyon JL; Preston-Martin S
Health Phys; 1995 Apr; 68(4):472-83. PubMed ID: 7883559
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Epidemiological studies of Fukushima residents exposed to ionising radiation from the Fukushima Daiichi Nuclear Power Plant prefecture--a preliminary review of current plans.
Akiba S
J Radiol Prot; 2012 Mar; 32(1):1-10. PubMed ID: 22327057
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
