These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
142 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 31978336)
1. Science that Inspires. Cell Press Team Cell; 2020 Jan; 180(2):209-210. PubMed ID: 31978336 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. Scientific Authors in a Changing World of Scholarly Communication: What Does the Future Hold? Baffy G; Burns MM; Hoffmann B; Ramani S; Sabharwal S; Borus JF; Pories S; Quan SF; Ingelfinger JR Am J Med; 2020 Jan; 133(1):26-31. PubMed ID: 31419421 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. The role of social media in cardiology. Mandrola J; Futyma P Trends Cardiovasc Med; 2020 Jan; 30(1):32-35. PubMed ID: 30773326 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Four years, 400 articles, IF 5.4, and fast-track into PubMed. Mol Metab; 2017 Jan; 6(1):1. PubMed ID: 28123929 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. Attitudes and practices of open data, preprinting, and peer-review-A cross sectional study on Croatian scientists. Baždarić K; Vrkić I; Arh E; Mavrinac M; Gligora Marković M; Bilić-Zulle L; Stojanovski J; Malički M PLoS One; 2021; 16(6):e0244529. PubMed ID: 34153041 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. The state of the art in peer review. Tennant JP FEMS Microbiol Lett; 2018 Oct; 365(19):. PubMed ID: 30137294 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Measuring researchers' potential scholarly impact with structural variations: Four types of researchers in information science (1979-2018). Hou J; Yang X; Chen C PLoS One; 2020; 15(6):e0234347. PubMed ID: 32569295 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Journal transfer made easy. Nat Cell Biol; 2005 Jan; 7(1):1. PubMed ID: 15632939 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. Peer Reviewers and Their Critical Contributions to Scholarly Publishing. Avery MD J Midwifery Womens Health; 2022 May; 67(3):293-294. PubMed ID: 35593318 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. Communication of basic research and clinical experience of neuroscience among different countries. Kao MC Surg Neurol; 2009 Dec; 72 Suppl 2():S1-2. PubMed ID: 19944822 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. Interdisciplinarity: Less vague please. Bammer G Nature; 2015 Oct; 526(7574):506. PubMed ID: 26490607 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. Innovations in scholarly publishing. Evolving trends in research communication in a digital age: examples from the BMJ. Jain A Keio J Med; 2014; 63(4):67-8. PubMed ID: 25588512 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Reviewing multi-disciplinary papers: a challenge in neuroscience? De Schutter E Neuroinformatics; 2008; 6(4):253-5. PubMed ID: 18937074 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. Critical review of a scientific manuscript: a practical guide for reviewers. Falavigna A; Blauth M; Kates SL J Neurosurg; 2018 Jan; 128(1):312-321. PubMed ID: 29053077 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. Is the Impact Factor Driving the Demise of Symposium-Based Books? Weintraub PG J Insect Sci; 2019 Sep; 19(5):. PubMed ID: 31587062 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]