302 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 31978517)
1. Repeatability of arterial input functions and kinetic parameters in muscle obtained by dynamic contrast enhanced MR imaging of the head and neck.
Koopman T; Martens RM; Lavini C; Yaqub M; Castelijns JA; Boellaard R; Marcus JT
Magn Reson Imaging; 2020 May; 68():1-8. PubMed ID: 31978517
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Comprehensive population-averaged arterial input function for dynamic contrast-enhanced vmagnetic resonance imaging of head and neck cancer.
Onxley JD; Yoo DS; Muradyan N; MacFall JR; Brizel DM; Craciunescu OI
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 2014 Jul; 89(3):658-65. PubMed ID: 24929169
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Assessment of repeatability and treatment response in early phase clinical trials using DCE-MRI: comparison of parametric analysis using MR- and CT-derived arterial input functions.
Rata M; Collins DJ; Darcy J; Messiou C; Tunariu N; Desouza N; Young H; Leach MO; Orton MR
Eur Radiol; 2016 Jul; 26(7):1991-8. PubMed ID: 26385804
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. A comparison of two methods for estimating DCE-MRI parameters via individual and cohort based AIFs in prostate cancer: a step towards practical implementation.
Fedorov A; Fluckiger J; Ayers GD; Li X; Gupta SN; Tempany C; Mulkern R; Yankeelov TE; Fennessy FM
Magn Reson Imaging; 2014 May; 32(4):321-9. PubMed ID: 24560287
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. A model-constrained Monte Carlo method for blind arterial input function estimation in dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI: II. In vivo results.
Schabel MC; DiBella EV; Jensen RL; Salzman KL
Phys Med Biol; 2010 Aug; 55(16):4807-23. PubMed ID: 20679695
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Operator dependency of arterial input function in dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI.
Kleppestø M; Bjørnerud A; Groote IR; Kim M; Vardal J; Larsson C
MAGMA; 2022 Feb; 35(1):105-112. PubMed ID: 34213687
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. A novel AIF tracking method and comparison of DCE-MRI parameters using individual and population-based AIFs in human breast cancer.
Li X; Welch EB; Arlinghaus LR; Chakravarthy AB; Xu L; Farley J; Loveless ME; Mayer IA; Kelley MC; Meszoely IM; Means-Powell JA; Abramson VG; Grau AM; Gore JC; Yankeelov TE
Phys Med Biol; 2011 Sep; 56(17):5753-69. PubMed ID: 21841212
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Estimating the arterial input function from dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI data with compensation for flow enhancement (II): Applications in spine diagnostics and assessment of crohn's disease.
van Schie JJN; Lavini C; van Vliet LJ; Kramer G; Pieters-van den Bos I; Marcus JT; Stoker J; Vos FM
J Magn Reson Imaging; 2018 May; 47(5):1197-1204. PubMed ID: 29193469
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. The Impact of Arterial Input Function Determination Variations on Prostate Dynamic Contrast-Enhanced Magnetic Resonance Imaging Pharmacokinetic Modeling: A Multicenter Data Analysis Challenge, Part II.
Huang W; Chen Y; Fedorov A; Li X; Jajamovich GH; Malyarenko DI; Aryal MP; LaViolette PS; Oborski MJ; O'Sullivan F; Abramson RG; Jafari-Khouzani K; Afzal A; Tudorica A; Moloney B; Gupta SN; Besa C; Kalpathy-Cramer J; Mountz JM; Laymon CM; Muzi M; Kinahan PE; Schmainda K; Cao Y; Chenevert TL; Taouli B; Yankeelov TE; Fennessy F; Li X
Tomography; 2019 Mar; 5(1):99-109. PubMed ID: 30854447
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Influence of Different Measurement Methods of Arterial Input Function on Quantitative Dynamic Contrast-Enhanced MRI Parameters in Head and Neck Cancer.
Dong W; Volk A; Djaroum M; Girot C; Balleyguier C; Lebon V; Garcia G; Ammari S; Temam S; Gorphe P; Wei L; Pitre-Champagnat S; Lassau N; Bidault F
J Magn Reson Imaging; 2023 Jul; 58(1):122-132. PubMed ID: 36269053
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Automatic individual arterial input functions calculated from PCA outperform manual and population-averaged approaches for the pharmacokinetic modeling of DCE-MR images.
Sanz-Requena R; Prats-Montalbán JM; Martí-Bonmatí L; Alberich-Bayarri Á; García-Martí G; Pérez R; Ferrer A
J Magn Reson Imaging; 2015 Aug; 42(2):477-87. PubMed ID: 25410482
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Improved repeatability of dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI using the complex MRI signal to derive arterial input functions: a test-retest study in prostate cancer patients.
Klawer EME; van Houdt PJ; Simonis FFJ; van den Berg CAT; Pos FJ; Heijmink SWTPJ; Isebaert S; Haustermans K; van der Heide UA
Magn Reson Med; 2019 May; 81(5):3358-3369. PubMed ID: 30656738
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Effects of artery input function on dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI for determining grades of gliomas.
Jia L; Wu X; Wan Q; Wan L; Jia W; Zhang N
Br J Radiol; 2021 Mar; 94(1119):20200699. PubMed ID: 33332981
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Effects of arterial input function selection on kinetic parameters in brain dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI.
Keil VC; Mädler B; Gieseke J; Fimmers R; Hattingen E; Schild HH; Hadizadeh DR
Magn Reson Imaging; 2017 Jul; 40():83-90. PubMed ID: 28438713
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI parametric mapping using high spatiotemporal resolution Golden-angle RAdial Sparse Parallel MRI and iterative joint estimation of the arterial input function and pharmacokinetic parameters.
Mazaheri Y; Kim N; Lakhman Y; Jafari R; Vargas A; Otazo R
NMR Biomed; 2022 Jul; 35(7):e4718. PubMed ID: 35226774
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Assessment of DCE-MRI parameters for brain tumors through implementation of physiologically-based pharmacokinetic model approaches for Gd-DOTA.
Spanakis M; Kontopodis E; Van Cauter S; Sakkalis V; Marias K
J Pharmacokinet Pharmacodyn; 2016 Oct; 43(5):529-47. PubMed ID: 27647272
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. The arterial input function: Spatial dependence within the imaging volume and its influence on 3D quantitative dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI for head and neck cancer.
Roberts J; Kim SE; Kholmovski EG; Hitchcock Y; Richards TJ; Anzai Y
Magn Reson Imaging; 2023 Sep; 101():40-46. PubMed ID: 37030177
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Impact of arterial input function selection on the accuracy of dynamic contrast-enhanced MRI quantitative analysis for the diagnosis of clinically significant prostate cancer.
Azahaf M; Haberlay M; Betrouni N; Ernst O; Behal H; Duhamel A; Ouzzane A; Puech P
J Magn Reson Imaging; 2016 Mar; 43(3):737-49. PubMed ID: 26303794
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. The Impact of Arterial Input Function Determination Variations on Prostate Dynamic Contrast-Enhanced Magnetic Resonance Imaging Pharmacokinetic Modeling: A Multicenter Data Analysis Challenge.
Huang W; Chen Y; Fedorov A; Li X; Jajamovich GH; Malyarenko DI; Aryal MP; LaViolette PS; Oborski MJ; O'Sullivan F; Abramson RG; Jafari-Khouzani K; Afzal A; Tudorica A; Moloney B; Gupta SN; Besa C; Kalpathy-Cramer J; Mountz JM; Laymon CM; Muzi M; Schmainda K; Cao Y; Chenevert TL; Taouli B; Yankeelov TE; Fennessy F; Li X
Tomography; 2016 Mar; 2(1):56-66. PubMed ID: 27200418
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Reproducibility of the aortic input function (AIF) derived from dynamic contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging (DCE-MRI) of the kidneys in a volunteer study.
Mendichovszky IA; Cutajar M; Gordon I
Eur J Radiol; 2009 Sep; 71(3):576-81. PubMed ID: 19004588
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
