These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

132 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 31978884)

  • 1. Index episode-of-care propensity-matched comparison of transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion (TLIF) techniques: open traditional TLIF versus midline lumbar interbody fusion (MIDLIF) versus robot-assisted MIDLIF.
    Ver MLP; Gum JL; Crawford CH; Djurasovic M; Owens RK; Brown M; Steele P; Carreon LY
    J Neurosurg Spine; 2020 Jan; 32(5):741-747. PubMed ID: 31978884
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Cost-effectiveness of minimally invasive midline lumbar interbody fusion versus traditional open transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion.
    Djurasovic M; Gum JL; Crawford CH; Owens K; Brown M; Steele P; Glassman SD; Carreon LY
    J Neurosurg Spine; 2019 Sep; 32(1):31-35. PubMed ID: 31518977
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Minimally-Invasive midline posterior interbody fusion with cortical bone trajectory screws compares favorably to traditional open transforaminal interbody fusion.
    Crawford CH; Owens RK; Djurasovic M; Gum JL; Dimar JR; Carreon LY
    Heliyon; 2019 Sep; 5(9):e02423. PubMed ID: 31535047
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Percutaneous Endoscopic Robot-Assisted Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion (PE RA-TLIF) for Lumbar Spondylolisthesis: A Technical Note and Two Years Clinical Results.
    Chang M; Wang L; Yuan S; Tian Y; Zhao Y; Liu X
    Pain Physician; 2022 Jan; 25(1):E73-E86. PubMed ID: 35051154
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Comparison of minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion and midline lumbar interbody fusion in patients with spondylolisthesis.
    Wang YY; Chung YH; Huang CH; Hu MH
    J Orthop Surg Res; 2024 May; 19(1):286. PubMed ID: 38725087
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Minimally invasive fusion surgery for patients with degenerative spondylolisthesis and severe lumbar spinal stenosis: a comparative study between MIDLIF and TLIF.
    Silva PS; Jardim A; Pereira J; Sousa R; Vaz R; Pereira P
    Eur Spine J; 2023 Sep; 32(9):3210-3217. PubMed ID: 37422769
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Cost-effectiveness of circumferential fusion for lumbar spondylolisthesis: propensity-matched comparison of transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion with anterior-posterior fusion.
    Jazini E; Gum JL; Glassman SD; Crawford CH; Djurasovic M; Owens RK; Dimar JR; McGraw KE; Carreon LY
    Spine J; 2018 Nov; 18(11):1969-1973. PubMed ID: 29705337
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Midline lumbar interbody fusion (MIDLIF) with cortical screws: initial experience and learning curve.
    Silva F; Silva PS; Vaz R; Pereira P
    Acta Neurochir (Wien); 2019 Dec; 161(12):2415-2420. PubMed ID: 31650331
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. A perioperative cost analysis comparing single-level minimally invasive and open transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion.
    Singh K; Nandyala SV; Marquez-Lara A; Fineberg SJ; Oglesby M; Pelton MA; Andersson GB; Isayeva D; Jegier BJ; Phillips FM
    Spine J; 2014 Aug; 14(8):1694-701. PubMed ID: 24252237
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Comparison of robot-assisted versus fluoroscopy-assisted minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion for degenerative lumbar spinal diseases: 2-year follow-up.
    Wang L; Li C; Wang Z; Li D; Tian Y; Yuan S; Liu X
    J Robot Surg; 2023 Apr; 17(2):473-485. PubMed ID: 35788970
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Comparison of Outcomes between Robot-Assisted Minimally Invasive Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion and Oblique Lumbar Interbody Fusion in Single-Level Lumbar Spondylolisthesis.
    Han XG; Tang GQ; Han X; Xing YG; Zhang Q; He D; Tian W
    Orthop Surg; 2021 Oct; 13(7):2093-2101. PubMed ID: 34596342
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Comparison of O-arm navigation and microscope-assisted minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion and conventional transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion for the treatment of lumbar isthmic spondylolisthesis.
    Peng P; Chen K; Chen H; Zhang K; Sun J; Yang P; Zhou F; Liu Y; Yang H; Mao H
    J Orthop Translat; 2020 Jan; 20():107-112. PubMed ID: 31908941
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Robot-assisted minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion versus open transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion: a retrospective matched-control analysis for clinical and quality-of-life outcomes.
    Chen X; Song Q; Wang K; Chen Z; Han Y; Shen H; Li Q
    J Comp Eff Res; 2021 Jul; 10(10):845-856. PubMed ID: 33906371
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. [Effects of robot-assisted minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion and traditional open surgery in the treatment of lumbar spondylolisthesis].
    Cui GY; Tian W; He D; Xing YG; Liu B; Yuan Q; Wang YQ; Sun YQ
    Zhonghua Wai Ke Za Zhi; 2017 Jul; 55(7):543-548. PubMed ID: 28655085
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Transforaminal interbody fusion versus anterior-posterior interbody fusion of the lumbar spine: a financial analysis.
    Whitecloud TS; Roesch WW; Ricciardi JE
    J Spinal Disord; 2001 Apr; 14(2):100-3. PubMed ID: 11285420
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. A cost benefit analysis of increasing surgical technology in lumbar spine fusion.
    Passias PG; Brown AE; Alas H; Bortz CA; Pierce KE; Hassanzadeh H; Labaran LA; Puvanesarajah V; Vasquez-Montes D; Wang E; Ihejirika RC; Diebo BG; Lafage V; Lafage R; Sciubba DM; Janjua MB; Protopsaltis TS; Buckland AJ; Gerling MC
    Spine J; 2021 Feb; 21(2):193-201. PubMed ID: 33069859
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Minimally Invasive Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion (MI-TLIF): A Video Technique Guide.
    Saela S; Pompliano M; Varghese J; Sinha K; Faloon M; Emami A
    JBJS Essent Surg Tech; 2023; 13(4):. PubMed ID: 38380431
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Assessment of radiographic and clinical outcomes of an articulating expandable interbody cage in minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion for spondylolisthesis.
    Massie LW; Zakaria HM; Schultz LR; Basheer A; Buraimoh MA; Chang V
    Neurosurg Focus; 2018 Jan; 44(1):E8. PubMed ID: 29290133
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Comparison of perioperative outcomes following open versus minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion in obese patients.
    Lau D; Khan A; Terman SW; Yee T; La Marca F; Park P
    Neurosurg Focus; 2013 Aug; 35(2):E10. PubMed ID: 23905948
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. A comparison of modern-era anterior lumbar interbody fusion and minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion at the lumbosacral junction.
    Farber SH; Dugan RK; White MD; Walker CT; O'Neill LK; Alan N; Zhou JJ; Turner JD; Tumialán LM; Uribe JS
    J Neurosurg Spine; 2023 Dec; 39(6):785-792. PubMed ID: 37548527
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.